Pahalgam Attack Anniversary: Expert Warns Pakistan Still Relies on Terror

Defence expert Hemant Mahajan, marking a year since the Pahalgam terror attack, states India's strong military response was effective in destroying terror camps. He warns that Pakistan continues to depend on cross-border terrorism as a low-cost, high-impact strategic tool against India. Mahajan highlights the lack of meaningful international pressure on Pakistan, describing global reactions as largely symbolic. He calls for a sustained, comprehensive strategy using military, economic, and covert instruments of national power to counter the threat.

Key Points: Pakistan Still Fueling Terror Post-Pahalgam: Defence Expert

  • India's swift multi-domain offensive delivered results
  • Pakistan's shielding of terror camps failed
  • International pressure on Pakistan remains symbolic
  • Cross-border terror persists as low-cost strategy for Pakistan
  • Call for sustained strategy using all national power
2 min read

Pahalgam terror attack anniversary: Defence expert says Pakistan still fueling terror despite setbacks

A year after the Pahalgam terror attack, defence expert Hemant Mahajan analyses India's military response and Pakistan's ongoing use of terrorism as strategy.

"India reacted in a very fast manner and launched a multi-domain war. - Hemant Mahajan"

Pune, April 20

A year after the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam terror attack, defence expert Hemant Mahajan has said that India's strong military response delivered results, but Pakistan continues to depend on terrorism as a strategic tool.

Reviewing the developments, Mahajan said India reacted swiftly, launching a multi-domain offensive that targeted terror infrastructure across the border. "India reacted in a very fast manner and launched a multi-domain war," he said, adding that several terror camps were destroyed and heavy militant casualties were inflicted.

He noted that Pakistan's attempts to shield these camps failed, while its retaliatory strikes on Indian airfields were effectively neutralised. "India's subsequent strikes on Pakistani airbases caused significant damage," he added.

Mahajan highlighted that India's decision to end operations after achieving its objectives reflected strategic clarity. "We ensured that our aim of the war was very clear and went in for conflict termination after achieving objectives," he said, contrasting it with prolonged global conflicts lacking exit strategies.

Despite the success, he raised concerns over the lack of meaningful international pressure on Pakistan. While global reactions condemned the attack, he described them as largely symbolic.

He also stressed that cross-border terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir persists because it remains a "low-cost, high-impact strategy" for Pakistan, despite strong counter-infiltration measures by Indian forces.

On diplomacy, Mahajan said India has made its case globally but cautioned that it has limits when dealing with countries like Pakistan. "Diplomacy is effective to an extent, but there are limitations," he stated.

Looking ahead, he called for a sustained and comprehensive strategy using all instruments of national power, military, economic, and covert, to counter Pakistan's support for terrorism.

He also pointed to Pakistan's internal instability, including unrest and economic stress, but warned that these challenges alone may not deter its current approach.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I agree with the military assessment, the article misses the human cost. We remember the bravehearts we lost in Pahalgam. The strategy must also focus on rehabilitating affected families in Kashmir and winning hearts and minds. Peace is the ultimate objective.
V
Vikram M
International pressure will always be symbolic. The West needs Pakistan for its own interests in Afghanistan. We have to rely on our own strength. Time to increase economic and cyber pressure too. Cut off their funding channels.
P
Priya S
It's frustrating. How long will this continue? Every few years there's an attack, we respond, and then it's back to the same. The common people on both sides want peace, but the establishment there thrives on this hostility. 😔
R
Rohit P
Mahajan sir is spot on about the 'low-cost, high-impact' strategy. It's cheap for them to send terrorists, but costs us lives and crores in security. Our focus should be on making this strategy too costly for them to pursue, by any means necessary.
M
Michael C
A sobering analysis. The point about conflict termination is crucial. The world could learn from India's calibrated response. However, the persistent threat means defense budgets will remain high, impacting development spending. A difficult balance.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50