US Strikes Over 1,700 Targets in Iran, Vows to Defeat "Terrorist Regime"

The United States has launched a massive military campaign dubbed Operation Epic Fury against Iran, striking over 1,700 targets in the first 72 hours. The operation, directed by the President, aims to dismantle Iran's security apparatus and prevent it from obtaining nuclear weapons. Senior House Democrats have demanded detailed legal and strategic justifications from the administration for the conflict. The strikes risk destabilizing the critical Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil shipping lane.

Key Points: US Operation Epic Fury Strikes 1,700+ Targets in Iran

  • Over 1,700 targets struck in 72 hours
  • Objectives include destroying missiles and navy
  • Lawmakers demand legal justification
  • Strait of Hormuz disruption risk
3 min read

Over 1,700 targets struck in Iran, claims US

The US launches massive Operation Epic Fury against Iran, striking over 1,700 targets with bombers, jets, and missiles. White House vows victory.

"America will win. The terrorist Iranian regime will be defeated. - The White House"

Washington, March 3

, The United States has struck "over 1,700" targets across Iran in the first 72 hours of Operation Epic Fury, unleashing bombers, fighter jets and missile systems in one of the largest direct military actions in recent years, as the White House declared "America will win" and that "the terrorist Iranian regime will be defeated."​

The operation began at "1:15 am, February 28, 2026," according to a Pentagon fact sheet titled Operation Epic Fury - First 72 Hours. It said U.S. Central Command "commenced Operation Epic Fury at the direction of the President of the United States" and is striking targets "to dismantle the Iranian regime's security apparatus, prioritising locations that pose an imminent threat."​

The White House, separately, listed four objectives. It said the mission is to "Destroy the Iranian regime's missiles," "Annihilate their Navy," "Ensure their terrorist proxies can no longer destabilise the world," and "Ensure Iran can NEVER obtain a nuclear weapon." It added: "America will win. The terrorist Iranian regime will be defeated."​

CENTCOM said the Iranian regime is "using mobile launchers to indiscriminately fire missiles in an attempt to inflict maximum harm across the region." It added: "U.S. forces are hunting these threats down and without apology or hesitation, we are taking them out."​

The Pentagon document listed "Target Location: Iran" and "Targets Struck: Over 1,700." It said the operation is taking place within the CENTCOM Area of Responsibility.​

The assets deployed reflect the scale of the campaign. They include B-1, B-2, and B-52 bombers. Fighter aircraft include F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22 and F-35 jets. The U.S. also used A-10 attack jets, EA-18G electronic attack aircraft, and airborne early warning systems.​

Missile defences listed include Patriot interceptor missile systems and THAAD anti-ballistic missile systems. The fact sheet also cited MQ-9 Reapers, M-142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, guided-missile destroyers, and "special capabilities we can't list here!"​

Targets struck include "Command and Control Centres," "IRGC Joint Headquarters," "IRGC Aerospace Forces Headquarters," "Integrated Air Defence Systems," "Ballistic Missile Sites," "Iranian Navy Ships," "Iranian Navy Submarines," "Anti-ship Missile Sites," and "Military Communication Capabilities."​

Even as operations continued, senior House Democrats demanded detailed answers from the administration.​

In a March 2 letter to top national security officials, lawmakers wrote: "The decision to initiate or expand armed conflict is among the gravest responsibilities entrusted to our government." They added: "A number of our brave service members have already lost their lives in this conflict."​

The letter said Congress and the American people are owed "clear objectives, legal justification, and a defined strategy." It said a classified briefing "must address strategy, intelligence, legal justification, and long-term consequences in concrete terms."​

Lawmakers requested answers on "Imminent Threat Justification," "Strategic Objectives and Victory," "Regime Change," "Nuclear Security," risks to the "Strait of Hormuz and Maritime Security," and the "Costs and Impacts on Munitions Inventories."​

The United States and Iran have had adversarial relations since 1979. Tensions have centred on Iran's nuclear programme, ballistic missile development, and support for armed groups in the region.​

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments. Any sustained disruption there can affect energy prices and markets worldwide.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The scale is shocking. 1700+ targets? The human cost on the ground must be terrible. The US says it's targeting security apparatus, but civilians always suffer the most in such bombings. Our foreign policy should focus on de-escalation and protecting Indian interests in the region.
R
Rohit P
A direct conflict between major powers in our neighbourhood is the last thing India needs. It will destabilise everything. Our energy security, diaspora in the Gulf, and trade routes are all at risk. The MEA needs to tread very carefully.
S
Sarah B
As an expat in Mumbai, watching this unfold is worrying. The "America will win" rhetoric is concerning. Victory isn't just about military strikes; it's about the lasting peace that follows. The Democrats' letter asking for a clear strategy is the right question.
V
Vikram M
The objective to ensure Iran never gets a nuclear weapon is something many can agree with for regional stability. But the method... this full-scale war? It feels like 2003 all over again. Hope our leadership uses its diplomatic channels to push for dialogue.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, I have to criticize the article's tone a bit—it reads like a Pentagon press release. Where is the perspective from Tehran? Where is the analysis of the "imminent threat" justification? We need balanced reporting, especially when the stakes are this high for us in India.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50