Iran's Speaker Mocks US Media Reports on Possible Nuclear Deal

Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed US media reports about a possible arrangement with the US, mocking Axios as 'Operation Fauxios'. Despite the mockery, negotiations between Washington and Tehran are reportedly advancing towards a preliminary accord. The framework includes a 14-point memorandum of understanding covering a ceasefire, nuclear enrichment pause, and sanctions relief. Key sticking points include the duration of Iran's enrichment moratorium and enhanced inspection mechanisms.

Key Points: Iran Mocks US Media 'Operation Fauxios' on Nuclear Talks

  • Iran's speaker mocks US media reports as 'Operation Fauxios'
  • Talks reportedly advance on 14-point MOU framework
  • Key disputes include enrichment moratorium duration (5 vs 20 years)
  • US seeks enhanced inspections and uranium stockpile removal
4 min read

'Operation Trust Me Bro' failed, now it's 'Operation Fauxios': Iran's Parliament Speaker mocks US media reports on possible arrangement

Iran's Parliament speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf mocks US media reports on a possible Iran-US arrangement as 'Operation Fauxios'

"Operation Trust Me Bro failed. Now back to routine with Operation Fauxios. - Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf"

Tehran, May 7

Iranian parliament speaker, Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, on Thursday dismissed reports about a possible arrangement between Iran and the United States, accusing American media outlets of spreading what he described as recurring misinformation campaigns, according to Iranian state media Press TV.

In a post on X, Ghalibaf mocked recent reports published by US-based outlet Axios, sarcastically referring to them as "Operation Fauxios."

"Operation Trust Me Bro failed. Now back to routine with Operation Fauxios," he said.

According to Press TV, the Iranian parliament speaker suggested, "That the circulation of such reports reflected a routine pattern in US media coverage, particularly stories attributed to unnamed sources that Iranian officials have repeatedly rejected as unfounded and have later been proven invariably wrong."

Meanwhile, negotiations between Washington and Tehran are reportedly advancing towards a preliminary accord aimed at halting current hostilities and establishing a framework for expansive nuclear talks. According to an Axios report, which cited several American officials and sources acquainted with the dialogue, the progress is being viewed as the most significant development since the onset of the conflict, though a definitive resolution has not yet been secured.

The reported framework consists of a "one-page, 14-point memorandum of understanding" designed to trigger an immediate ceasefire and launch a "30-day negotiation window" to hammer out a broader settlement.

Under these terms, Iran would reportedly agree to a short-term pause in nuclear enrichment. In exchange, the United States would initiate the removal of sanctions and the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets. Furthermore, both nations would work to reduce tensions and ease transit constraints within the Strait of Hormuz.

The report notes that many of the stipulations are "conditional on the outcome of further negotiations," suggesting that the path forward remains fraught with the risk of "renewed conflict or a prolonged period of uncertainty."

American officials indicated to Axios that President Donald Trump's recent choice to de-escalate military activities in the Strait of Hormuz was prompted by these diplomatic inroads.

The diplomacy is being spearheaded by US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who are reportedly communicating with Tehran both through direct channels and third-party intermediaries.

If formalised, the memorandum would officially "declare an end to the war" and shift the venue for technical discussions to either Islamabad or Geneva.

A primary point of contention remains the timeframe for Iran's "moratorium on uranium enrichment."

While Washington is reportedly advocating for a duration of "up to 20 years," Tehran has suggested "five years." Sources indicate a potential compromise may lie between 12 and 15 years.

The US is further seeking a mechanism to "extend the moratorium if Iran violates the terms."

Following this period, the proposal would allow Iran to "resume limited enrichment to 3.67 percent."

Tehran would also be required to pledge against the pursuit of nuclear weapons.

A US official cited in the report suggested the deal could incorporate a "clause preventing Iran from operating underground nuclear facilities" and mandate "enhanced inspections, including snap checks by UN inspectors."

Another delicate proposal under review involves the potential removal of Iran's "stockpile of highly enriched uranium," with one possibility being the "transfer of the material to the United States."

Despite the momentum, the White House remains wary, believing the Iranian leadership is "divided," which may hinder a final consensus.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlighted the technical hurdles, remarking, "We don't have to have the actual agreement written in one day."

He emphasised the need for a solution that is "very clear on the topics they are willing to negotiate on and the extent of the concessions they are willing to make at the front end in order to make it worthwhile."

However, Rubio also voiced scepticism regarding the Iranian leadership's reliability, describing some figures as "insane in the brain."The upcoming 48 hours are viewed as a turning point as the US awaits Tehran's feedback on several critical points.

While the current outline is seen as a "fragile but significant step toward de-escalation," the report warns that the "risk of breakdown remains high."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

M
Michael C
Honestly, I find this whole thing tiresome. Every few years there's some "breakthrough" or "crisis" and nothing really changes. 20 years vs 5 years for enrichment moratorium? Split the difference at 12-15 and move on. But with Trump's team involved, I'm not holding my breath. Witkoff and Kushner aren't exactly known for their diplomatic finesse. The whole "insane in the brain" comment from Rubio shows how little respect there is on either side.
P
Priya S
As an Indian, I watch these US-Iran games with a mix of amusement and concern. On one hand, Ghalibaf's trolling is hilarious - "Operation Fauxios" indeed! On the other, our energy security depends on stability in the Gulf. The proposed 14-point MOU sounds promising if it can reduce tensions in the Strait of Hormuz. But 20 years enrichment pause? That's practically asking Iran to surrender its nuclear program. No wonder Tehran is laughing at these reports. 🙄
R
Rahul R
I think people forget that Iran has legitimate security concerns. They've seen what happened to Iraq, Libya, Syria... why would they trust the US? That said, this dance is exhausting. The "unnamed sources" from Axios are probably just US officials floating trial balloons. Meanwhile, the real negotiations happen behind closed doors. Wouldn't be surprised if there's already a backchannel deal being crafted in Islamabad or Geneva as the article mentions. India should quietly strengthen its ties with both sides.
D
Deepak U
"Operation Trust Me Bro failed" - that's going to be my new WhatsApp status! 😂 But seriously, this whole saga shows how broken US-Iran relations are. The proposed transfer of enriched uranium to the US? That's absurd - no sovereign nation would agree to that. And Rubio calling Iranian leaders "insane in the brain" while expecting

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50