NTPC Chief Flags Low Private Interest in Nuclear Power Despite New Law

NTPC Chairman Gurdeep Singh has noted a lack of expected private sector excitement for nuclear power investment despite the new Shanti Act addressing liability and participation concerns. He emphasized that swift framing of rules and focused execution are critical to achieving India's ambitious 100 GW nuclear capacity target by 2047. Singh highlighted the need for technology diversification, cautioning against over-reliance on a single supplier, and pointed to lingering state-level hesitation in hosting plants. NTPC itself plans to build about 30 GW of the national target, moving from zero nuclear capacity today.

Key Points: NTPC CMD on Waning Private Sector Interest in Nuclear Power

  • Private sector interest low despite new law
  • Execution & rules key to 100 GW target
  • Need for diversified tech suppliers
  • State-level acceptance remains a challenge
  • NTPC aims for 30 GW of nuclear capacity
4 min read

NTPC CMD flags waning private sector interest in nuclear despite new law, calls for execution focus to hit 100 GW target

NTPC Chairman Gurdeep Singh questions low private excitement for nuclear projects despite new liability law, stressing execution to hit India's 100 GW target.

"But after that, I think the same kind of excitement from the private sector is not seen. - Gurdeep Singh"

New Delhi, April 17

Despite the government enacting the landmark Shanti Act to open up nuclear power, the same level of "excitement from the private sector is not seen," NTPC Chairman and Managing Director Gurdeep Singh said on Friday.

Speaking at an event on India's nuclear journey, Singh said the law addressed the two biggest concerns that had held back private participation for years.

"Their main concern was liability, which I believe has been taken care of, and the other end is the private sector participation, which is again already taken care of," he said. "But after that, I think the same kind of excitement from the private sector is not seen. I'm not sure what the reason is... what are the things which are really causing some kind of constraints?"

Singh called the Act a "pioneering effort" by the government and said it was passed after "wider discussion and extensive involvement from almost all stakeholders." The next step, he stressed, is framing the rules quickly. "The Act has been enacted, and now the work has to start on the rules... as soon as this comes, this is far better." He urged the conference to spend time on recommendations that can go to the government, especially on fuel. "The fuel availability for the plant, which is going to be for 60 years, can be insured... energy security, whether it is in the primary energy or whether it is in the logistics, I think this is much more important than anything else."

India has set a target of 100 GW of nuclear capacity to help achieve Viksit Bharat by 2047. Singh said three sources will underpin India's energy security: coal, renewables with storage "so that it can become dispatchable power whenever you want"; and nuclear, which he called a "very, very important pillar." Globally, nuclear provides about 10% of electricity from 400 GW of capacity, with long plant lives of 60-plus years. "Countries which have earlier gone for nuclear... are reaping the benefit," he said, citing France as a "shining example" in the current energy crisis.

On technology choice, Singh cautioned against over-dependence on a single supplier or country. "If you are having dependence only on one technology or one supplier or one of the service providers... we can face serious situations. And this is what, at present, I think the world is facing." He said even if domestic options are "5-10% costlier," control over technology and resources should get "much more priority rather than only... splitting the last paisa for the balance sheet."

NTPC itself aims to build around 30 GW of the 100 GW national target by 2047, from zero today. "There is a long way to go," Singh said, adding that financing for NTPC will be "relatively easier than somebody who is going to do the project financing." On small modular reactors, he said NTPC's assessment is to focus on larger sets for now. "It is coming out clearly that companies like NTPC should focus on the larger sets rather than the SMRs at present." SMRs could suit captive industry use, but "the cost is going to be quite enormous... if they want to have the standby facilities."

Execution remains the big challenge, Singh noted. "Many of the countries, including us... are taking quite a long time and... the cost is coming from the IDC." Standardised designs, faster regulatory clearances, and on-site decision-making between developers and contractors are key to cutting timelines. He also flagged state-level hesitation despite the Prime Minister's push for at least one nuclear plant in every state. "We are working with around 14 states... still, I think the acceptance is not that high." Visits to sites like Kakrapar, he said, have shifted perceptions, and more such outreach is needed. "Nuclear is safe." Singh closed by thanking the Central Electricity Authority for convening the conference and said the discussions should help "take the nuclear journey forward."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Private sector is probably waiting for the rules to be framed. The Act is one thing, but the detailed regulations will define the actual risk and return. They need clarity on fuel supply guarantees and long-term power purchase agreements. Hope the government moves fast on this.
R
Rohit P
His point about not depending on a single foreign supplier is crucial. We learned this lesson in other sectors. Even if indigenous tech is slightly costlier, it's worth it for strategic control. Atmanirbharta in nuclear tech is non-negotiable for a Viksit Bharat.
S
Sarah B
Interesting read. From an outside perspective, the scale of ambition (100 GW) is impressive. But the financing and timeline challenges are immense. NTPC having "easier" financing highlights the barrier for pure private players. The risk profile of nuclear is unique.
K
Karthik V
The public perception issue is real. People still have fears because of Chernobyl/Fukushima, even though our safety record is good. More site visits and transparency can help. Nuclear is clean and reliable base-load power. We need it alongside solar and wind.
M
Michael C
A respectful criticism: While the focus on large reactors makes sense for grid-scale power, dismissing SMRs entirely might be short-sighted. They offer modularity and could be faster to deploy in remote areas or for industrial clusters. The cost argument needs a deeper dive.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50