NTA rejects viral NEET-UG 2026 OMR claims, says digitally altered sheets being circulated
New Delhi, July 20
The National Testing Agency on Monday rejected a series of claims made by several NEET 2026 candidates regarding their OMR answer sheets and results, stating that the images circulating on social media were digitally fabricated and did not match the official records.
In a series of posts on X, the NTA said it had verified the records of multiple candidates, including Avaneesh Srivastava, Abhay Yadav, Lakshya Singh and Arya Singh, and found that the scores declared by the agency were accurate.
Referring to Avaneesh Srivastava (Application No. 260411198880, Roll No. 2001805051), the NTA said: "The genuine OMR of the candidate is on file. It was also emailed to him at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window."
The agency said the original OMR bore the candidate's correct personal details, signature, thumb impression and the signatures of invigilators.
It further stated: "The image being circulated is not an OMR sheet issued by NTA. The identity inserted into that image ('Ajeet Singh, son of Shri Lakhan Singh and Smt. Reena Singh') does not correspond to any candidate registered for NEET (UG) 2026."
According to the NTA, the viral image was "a digitally regenerated version of the candidate's own genuine OMR sheet", in which identity fields had been overwritten using AI or OCR-based tools. The agency said Avaneesh Srivastava's score of 337 marks had been verified and remained unchanged.
In another post concerning Abhay Yadav (Application No. 260411367191), the NTA rejected the candidate's public claim that only five questions had been left unanswered and that he deserved 634 marks.
"The candidate has stated publicly that only 5 questions were left unattempted and that the result should be 634 marks. This is not supported by the record. Of 180 questions, 44 were left unattempted. The OMR and the calculation sheet on file are mutually consistent."
The agency said Abhay Yadav's score of 164 marks had been verified and stood as declared.
Responding to claims made by Lakshya Singh (Application No. 260412053016), the NTA said the circulated OMR sheet had been digitally manipulated.
"The image being circulated shows response markings that are not present on the genuine sheet. Additional bubbles have been shaded in by digital means to create a forged OMR sheet."
The NTA said Lakshya Singh had attempted 54 of the 180 questions, answering 34 correctly and 20 incorrectly, while leaving 126 questions unattempted. His score of 116 marks was verified, it added.
The agency also dismissed allegations made by Arya Singh (Application No. 260410434102), saying the circulated OMR image had been altered.
"The image being circulated is a digitally altered version of that same sheet. The recorded time of signature of one of the invigilators has been changed from 3:45 PM on the genuine sheet to 2:45 PM on the altered image. There are several other markings of digital alteration on the forged OMR sheet."
The NTA said Arya Singh's score of 167 marks had also been verified and remained unchanged.
In a separate post addressing the wider controversy, the agency said: "Regarding OMR-related claims for NEET (UG) 2026 being circulated on social media, it may be noted that the genuine OMR of every candidate concerned is on record with NTA... The images being circulated as the 'correct' OMR are digitally fabricated. They are not documents issued by NTA."
The agency warned that "Creating or circulating a forged OMR answer sheet is an offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024," adding that action could be taken against those involved in generating or sharing such forged documents.
— IANS
Reader Comments
As someone who went through Indian competitive exams, I find this whole controversy bizarre. The NTA clearly has digital records of every sheet. If you look at the data - 44 unattempted questions for Abhay Yadav who claimed only 5? That's a massive discrepancy. Social media mob mentality is dangerous. Students should demand better transparency from NTA but also accept responsibility for their own performance.
Ek baat samajh nahi aati, agar NTA ke paas original OMR hai toh pehle hi kyun nahi dikhaya? Ab jab controversy bada ho gaya tabh post karna? Transparency ka issue hai. Aur ye 44 unattempted ka case - kya answer key ke saath verification ka process clear hai? Justice delayed is justice denied. Merit ka system India me secure hona chahiye, specially NEET jaise high-stakes exam. 🎯
Respect for NTA's quick response but they should have an independent third-party audit. The manipulation like changing invigilator's time from 3:45 to 2:45 is definitely suspicious. But what about students who genuinely think there's an error? Automated systems can sometimes make mistakes. My cousin is preparing for NEET and this kind of news creates unnecessary panic. Hope NTA establishes a more robust grievance system.
I've worked in educational assessment in the UK and the level of digital forensics required here is impressive. The NTA's statement about AI/OCR tools being used to fabricate sheets is credible. In India, where WhatsApp university dominates news consumption, this is dangerous. Students need to understand that forging government exam documents is a criminal offense under the 2024 Act. But equally, NTA must ensure their systems are tamper-proof.
<
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.