India Rejects US Claim on Failed Trade Deal, Says Close to Agreement

India's Ministry of External Affairs has firmly rejected the characterization by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick regarding the status of a bilateral trade agreement. The MEA spokesperson stated that the two nations were close to a deal on several occasions and that India remains committed to a mutually beneficial agreement. Lutnick had claimed the deal fell through because Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not call President Donald Trump to finalize it, causing the US to move on to agreements with other Asian nations. India maintains its position that the negotiations were ongoing and the reported remarks do not accurately reflect the discussions.

Key Points: India Rejects US Trade Deal Claim, Says Negotiations Ongoing

  • MEA disputes US official's account
  • Trade deal was near completion
  • India remains interested in pact
  • US claims India missed deadline
3 min read

"Not accurate": India after US Commerce Secretary remarks on trade deal

India's MEA disputes US Commerce Secretary's account of failed trade pact, stating they were close to a deal and remain committed to negotiations.

"On several occasions, we have been close to a deal. The characterization of these discussions... is not accurate. - Randhir Jaiswal, MEA Spokesperson"

New Delhi, January 9

The Ministry of External Affairs on Friday said it had been close to a trade deal with the United States on several occasions, and the characterisation by the US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick about it was "not accurate."

"On several occasions, we have been close to a deal. The characterization of these discussions, the reported remarks, is not accurate," MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at the weekly presser.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump have spoken over phone on several occasions over the past year, covering different aspects of wide ranging partnership between India and the US, Jaiswal said.

"We have seen the remarks. India and the United States were committed to negotiating a bilateral trade agreement with the US as far as far back as 13th of February last year. That is, since then, two sides have held multiple rounds of negotiations to arrive at a balanced and mutually beneficial trade agreement," the MEA spokesperson said.

"On several occasions, we have been close to a deal. The characterization of these discussions, the reported remarks, is not accurate," he said.

India remains interested in a mutually beneficial trade deal between two complementary economies, and look forward to concluding it, he noted.

Earlier, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had claimed that the trade deal between India and the United States did not happen as Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not place a call to Donald Trump.

In a conversation with American venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya, as part of the 'All-In Podcast' on Thursday (local time), Lutnick said that while contracts were negotiated and the entire deal structure was prepared, the final step required direct, leader-level engagement.

"I would negotiate the contracts and set the whole deal up, but let's be clear. It's his (Trump's) deal. He's the closer. He does it. It's all set up, you got to have Modi, call the President. They were uncomfortable doing it. So Modi didn't call. That Friday left, in the next week we did Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, we announced a whole bunch of deals," the US Commerce Secretary said.

Lutnick went on to explain Trump's broader trade negotiation strategy, describing it as a "staircase" model. According to him, countries that moved first received the best possible terms, while those that followed later were offered progressively higher rates.

Referring to the first trade deal with the United Kingdom, Lutnick said Trump was repeatedly asked about which country would be next, and India was publicly named multiple times.

India, he said, was given "three Fridays" to close the deal, effectively putting it on a "short clock."

However, according to Lutnick, India did not meet the deadline and as a result, the US moved ahead with trade agreements with several Asian countries, including Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam, announcing a series of deals across Asia.

Lutnick said these agreements were negotiated at higher rates, as the US had initially assumed that India's deal would be completed earlier. When India later approached the US, around three weeks after the deadline, seeking to proceed, it was told that the opportunity had passed.

Trump administration has imposed tariffs on countries that were major exporters to the US, including India and China. There is a 50 per cent tariffs on goods from India entering the United States since August 2025.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
This "short clock" and "three Fridays" deadline sounds like a high-pressure sales tactic, not how sovereign nations negotiate complex trade deals. India was right to not rush into an agreement that wasn't fully balanced. Jai Hind!
A
Aman W
It's a bit disappointing if we genuinely missed a window and lost favorable terms. Trade deals mean jobs and growth. Hope our team is being agile enough. The world doesn't wait. 🤔
S
Sarah B
Watching from Canada. The "staircase model" described is interesting but seems designed to create FOMO (fear of missing out) among nations. India's large domestic market gives it some leverage to negotiate carefully.
V
Vikram M
Why is the story about a PM not making a phone call? The deal should stand on its own economic merits, not on leader-level phone calls. Feels like the US side is trying to blame us for their own shifting strategies.
K
Karthik V
The 50% tariffs since last August are hurting our exporters. We need a deal, but a good one. Let's not get bullied. At the same time, we must be pragmatic and not let perfect be the enemy of good.
N
Nisha Z
The

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50