North Korea Declares Itself Not Bound by NPT, Rejects UN Pressure

North Korea's UN envoy Kim Song stated the country is not bound by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty under any circumstances, rejecting international pressure. He called attempts to force compliance a "wanton violation" of international law. The statement came during the NPT review conference in New York, where signatory states evaluate treaty compliance. North Korea withdrew from the treaty in 2003 and has since codified its nuclear status in its constitution.

Key Points: North Korea: Not Bound by NPT Under Any Circumstances

  • North Korea rejects NPT obligations, claiming nuclear program is legal under its constitution
  • UN envoy Kim Song denounces US and others as "brigandish and shameless"
  • Statement comes during NPT review conference at UN headquarters
  • North Korea formally withdrew from NPT in 2003
  • Pyongyang's new constitution codifies Kim Jong-un's authority over nuclear weapons
3 min read

North Korea not bound by NPT under any circumstances: UN envoy

North Korea's UN envoy says Pyongyang is not bound by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, calling forced compliance a "wanton violation" of international law.

"Clarifying once again, the DPRK is not bound by the NPT in any case. - Kim Song"

Seoul, May 7

North Korea is not bound under any circumstances by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, its representative to the United Nations said in a statement released Thursday, calling any attempt to force Pyongyang to fulfill treaty obligations a "wanton violation" of international law.

In the statement, dated May 6 and carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency, Kim Song, Pyongyang's permanent representative to the UN, claimed his country's nuclear program reflects its "obligations under the law on nuclear forces policy and the constitution, which enshrined the country's legal status as a nuclear-armed state."

"I denounce and reject in the strongest tone the brigandish and shameless acts of the specific countries, including the US, which are taking issue with the DPRK's realistic and just access to nuclear weapons through the legal route and exercise of its inherent defensive rights as a sovereign state," he added. DPRK stands for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the North's official name.

The statement came as the 11th Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons is currently under way at UN headquarters. Signatory states of the treaty convene a review conference every five years to evaluate how well the treaty, adopted in 1968, is being upheld.

North Korea announced its withdrawal from the treaty in 1993 and formally withdrew in 2003, Yonhap news agency reported.

The North's latest nuclear rhetoric also came amid expectations that North Korea could be on the agenda at the planned summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing next week.

The North Korean diplomat argued forcing the North to fulfill obligations under the treaty is a "wanton violation of the spirit of the treaty and a total disregard of the purpose and principle of international law."

"The position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state does not change in accordance with rhetorical assertion or unilateral desire of outsiders," he said. "Clarifying once again, the DPRK is not bound by the NPT in any case."

Kim further accused Washington of "neglecting" its nuclear disarmament commitments by providing other countries with advanced military technology, such as "'extended deterrence' and transfer of nuclear submarine technology to non-nuclear states."

While Pyongyang's stance on the NPT "has largely remained unchanged," South Korea's unification ministry noted a marked shift in how North Korea framed its nuclear program, anchoring its legitimacy within a newly revised constitution.

"This time, it underscores its status as a nuclear-armed state based on its constitution and laws," a ministry official told reporters.

North Korea's revised constitution in March stipulated the president of the state affairs commission has the right to command the country's nuclear forces, codifying leader Kim Jong-un's authority to command the use of nuclear weapons for the first time.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The US criticizing others while providing nuclear submarines to Australia and maintaining thousands of warheads is peak hypocrisy. North Korea might be extreme, but they're not wrong about the double standards in the non-proliferation regime.
P
Priya S
As an Indian, I see the irony. We've managed our nuclear program responsibly without signing the NPT, but North Korea's approach seems much more aggressive. Their constitution explicitly making the leader sole commander of nuclear forces is scary. This makes denuclearization talks even harder.
R
Rohit P
North Korea is basically saying 'we're a nuclear state whether you like it or not.' The international community has no real leverage here. Sanctions haven't worked, diplomacy has stalled, and now they've written it into their constitution. India should watch closely how this plays out.
M
Michael C
The US and China are meeting next week. North Korea will definitely be on the agenda, but what can really be done? Trump's approach has been all over the place - from fire and fury to love letters with Kim Jong-un. Now we're back to square one.
V
Vikram M
This is a classic case of 'might makes right' in international relations. North Korea saw what happened to Libya and Iraq when they gave up their weapons programs. They've decided nuclear weapons are their only guarantee of survival. It's a dangerous world.
K

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50