NewKerala.com

North Korea Slams UN Human Rights Resolution as "Grave Political Provocation"

North Korea has vehemently condemned a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution criticizing its human rights record, branding it a "grave political provocation." The resolution, adopted by consensus and co-sponsored by 50 countries including South Korea, calls for Pyongyang to end systematic rights violations. North Korea's foreign ministry argued the UN review system violates the principle of non-interference in internal affairs and is polluted by politicization. South Korean officials noted the regime's reaction appears more intense than in previous years, with warnings that participating countries will be held accountable.

Key Points: North Korea Condemns UN Human Rights Resolution

  • UN adopts annual rights resolution
  • North Korea denounces it as provocation
  • Resolution co-sponsored by 50 nations
  • NK warns of consequences for sponsors
  • Seoul notes intensified reaction
2 min read

North Korea condemns UN human rights resolution on Pyongyang: KCNA

North Korea rejects UN Human Rights Council resolution, calling it a political provocation and vowing to hold co-sponsoring countries accountable.

"a grave political provocation to the dignity and sovereignty of the DPRK - North Korean Foreign Ministry Spokesperson"

Seoul, April 2

North Korea on Thursday condemned a recent United Nations resolution on human rights violations in the country, calling it a "grave political provocation."

The reaction came after the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council adopted its annual resolution on Pyongyang's human rights by consensus Monday at its 61st regular session, co-sponsored by 50 countries, including South Korea.

"(Our) foreign ministry brands the adoption of this anti-DPRK 'human rights resolution' as a grave political provocation to the dignity and sovereignty of the DPRK and denounces and rejects it in the most powerful language," a ministry spokesperson said in a statement carried by the Korean Central News Agency.

DPRK stands for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the official name of North Korea, Yonhap news agency reported.

The latest UN resolution condemned the long-standing and systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations and abuses in North Korea and urges the North to take "immediately all steps" necessary to end such crimes.

The statement argued the UN human rights review system targeting individual states constitutes an act of hostility that runs counter to the UN Charter's principle of non-intervention in internal affairs.

"The practice of adopting such anti-DPRK 'human rights resolution' which has lasted for 20-odd years is a miniature fully showing the deplorable present situation of the UN human rights arena which has been extremely polluted by politicization, selectivity and double standards," it added.

The North Korean foreign ministry warned the "malicious behavior" of countries that joined in slandering North Korea's national and social institutions would be taken into account.

It also referred to hundreds of children in need of special protection being targeted and killed by precision-guided weapons, apparently alluding to a US attack that led to the deaths of nearly 200 students and teachers at a school in Iran, in what appeared to be an attempt to deflect human rights criticism against the regime.

An official at Seoul's unification ministry assessed that North Korea's reaction to this year's human rights resolution appears more intense than in the past, referring to the regime's pledge to take participating countries into account.

Sources said this year's pointed statement appears to be targeted at the South Korean government as North Korea could accuse the South of taking an inconsistent stance because Seoul co-sponsored the resolution despite its continue calls for peaceful coexistence with the North.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
North Korea's deflection by bringing up the Iran school attack is a classic whataboutism tactic. We see this often in global politics. The suffering of the North Korean people is well-documented. The international community, including India, should advocate for dialogue and humanitarian access, not just resolutions that get rejected outright.
A
Aman W
As an Indian, I believe in 'Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam' (the world is one family). We cannot turn a blind eye to systematic human rights abuses anywhere. However, the approach matters. Decades of the same condemnatory resolution have achieved little. Perhaps a more engagement-based strategy, like Track II diplomacy, is needed for a breakthrough.
S
Sarah B
The article mentions South Korea co-sponsored it. That's the real story here. It shows how inter-Korean relations are at another low. Peaceful coexistence calls from Seoul ring hollow to Pyongyang when they sign onto such resolutions. The regional stability impact is concerning.
V
Vikram M
Frankly, after 20 years of the same cycle—resolution, condemnation, threat—it feels like a pointless ritual. The UNHRC's credibility suffers when it's seen as a tool for certain countries. The focus should be on quiet, persistent humanitarian efforts to help the people, not grandstanding that only hardens the regime's position.
K
Karthik V
The regime's warning to take participating countries "into account" is a clear threat. This creates a difficult position for neighbours and highlights why many countries, India included, often prefer a more balanced, non-confrontational approach in such forums. Direct confrontation rarely works with isolated states.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50