Arab League Chief: "No One Can Defeat Russia in Ukraine," Cites Cold War Lessons

Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit asserted that Russia cannot be defeated in the Ukraine conflict, linking this to the historical balance of power that prevented nuclear war during the Cold War. He contrasted the current situation with Russia's defeat in Afghanistan, which was far from its homeland. Aboul Gheit also mentioned current U.S. efforts to distance Russia from China and reflected on a period in the 1990s when Russia, under Boris Yeltsin, explored joining NATO. This historical pivot highlights the shift from Russia's post-Soviet quest for integration with the West to its current confrontational stance.

Key Points: Arab League Chief: Russia Cannot Be Defeated in Ukraine

  • Russia's position in Ukraine is unassailable
  • Cold War powers avoided nuclear conflict
  • US seeks to separate Russia from China
  • Russia once sought NATO membership
  • NATO's eastward expansion created tensions
3 min read

"No one can defeat Russia in Ukraine": Arab League chief Ahmed Aboul Gheit

Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit states Russia cannot be defeated in Ukraine, drawing on Cold War nuclear deterrence and historical context.

"Russia is building its potential, and no one can defeat Russia in Ukraine. - Ahmed Aboul Gheit"

New Delhi, January 31

Arab League Secretary General Ahmed Aboul Gheit reflected on global power dynamics, saying that major powers avoided nuclear conflict even during the Cold War, while stressing that Russia cannot be defeated in Ukraine.

Setting out his broader view of international stability, Aboul Gheit, speaking on Friday at a public event hosted by the Indian Council of World Affairs and moderated by former diplomat Talmiz Ahmad, said in New Delhi, "In the midst of a Cold War, Russia, the US and China were maintaining peace because otherwise nuclear weapons would have been activated."

Linking this historical balance to present realities, he added that Moscow continues to strengthen its position, stating, "Russia is building its potential, and no one can defeat Russia in Ukraine."

Drawing comparisons with earlier conflicts to underline his point, the Arab League chief remarked, "You can defeat Russia in Afghanistan because it is 11,000 miles away from Moscow."

Turning to current geopolitical realignments, Aboul Gheit also spoke about shifting strategies, saying, "The US is trying to take Russia away from China."

Referring to earlier developments in Europe to provide historical context, he said, "Russia wanted to join NATO in 1993-94 with the emergence of Putin and the offer of some French politicians."

That period marked a phase when Russia explored closer engagement with Western security structures, with then-President Boris Yeltsin pursuing a cooperative approach toward the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, including signalling interest in eventual membership as part of a new European security framework.

During this period, Yeltsin communicated with then-US President Bill Clinton, expressing concern that NATO's eastward expansion ran counter to the spirit of post-Cold War agreements, even as Moscow initially avoided directly blocking the process and instead viewed engagement mechanisms as a possible alternative to enlargement.

In 1994, NATO launched the "Partnership for Peace", which Russia joined, with Yeltsin hoping the initiative could serve either as a pathway to membership or a substitute for it, rather than becoming a staging ground for former Warsaw Pact countries to enter the alliance ahead of Moscow.

However, as this programme began facilitating NATO's expansion, eventually leading to the accession of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, Russia formally opposed further enlargement in 1995, while continuing to seek a working partnership with the alliance.

Against this backdrop, some European leaders, including former German defence minister Volker Ruhe, argued that Moscow could accept new NATO members if relations were placed on a "fundamentally new, more cooperative basis", an approach that later contributed to the signing of the NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997.

Russia's early interest in integrating with Western security institutions thus stood in sharp contrast to its later confrontational stance, reflecting a brief post-Soviet phase in which Moscow sought accommodation rather than outright opposition to NATO's expanding role in Europe.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The historical context about Russia wanting to join NATO is fascinating! It shows how much the geopolitics have shifted. It also makes you wonder if the West missed a chance for a more stable Europe in the 90s. A lesson for today's policymakers, perhaps.
A
Aditya G
While I understand the realism in his statement, we must not forget the sovereignty of Ukraine. Saying "no one can defeat Russia" sounds like accepting fait accompli. The world should stand for principles, not just power. India's balanced stance is the right approach. 🇮🇳
S
Sarah B
Interesting to hear this perspective in New Delhi. It highlights how this conflict is viewed very differently in the Global South compared to Western media narratives. The focus on great power dynamics and historical mistakes is more nuanced.
K
Karthik V
His point about the US trying to pull Russia away from China is the most crucial takeaway for India. A strong Russia-China axis is not in our national interest. Our foreign policy needs to navigate this triangle very carefully. Complex times ahead.
M
Meera T
The comparison to Afghanistan is stark. It shows the advantage of fighting on your doorstep versus thousands of miles away. Ultimately, it's the common people in Ukraine who are suffering the most. Hope for peace soon. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50