IAEA Chief: No Evidence Iran Building Nuclear Bomb, But Uranium Stockpile Worries

The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, stated there is no evidence Iran is building a nuclear bomb, contradicting assertions from U.S. officials. However, Grossi expressed serious concern over Iran's large stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium and its refusal to grant full access to IAEA inspectors. His comments come amid heightened Middle East tensions following U.S. and Israeli strikes, with U.S. leaders like Donald Trump and Marco Rubio labeling Iran's regime as dangerous and intent on obtaining nuclear weapons. The IAEA maintains it cannot assure Iran's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful until outstanding safeguards issues are resolved.

Key Points: IAEA: No Proof of Iran Nuclear Bomb, Flags Uranium & Access Issues

  • IAEA finds no proof of systematic bomb program
  • Flags huge stock of near-weapons-grade uranium
  • Criticizes Iran's lack of transparency for inspectors
  • US leaders claim Iran seeks nukes and pose a threat
4 min read

"No evidence of Iran building nuclear bomb," says IAEA DG; but flags lack of cooperation from Iran

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi says no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon, but cites serious concerns over uranium stockpiles and lack of inspector access.

"while there has been no evidence of Iran building a nuclear bomb, its large stockpile of near-weapons grade enriched uranium... are cause for serious concern. - Rafael Grossi"

Vienna, March 4

The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Association appeared to have contradicted views put forth by the Donald Trump administration that Iran was intending to build nuclear weapons, but clarified that Iran's stock of nuclear grade Uranium was of concern.

In a post on X, Rafael Grossi said, "I have been very clear and consistent in my reports on Iran's nuclear programme: while there has been no evidence of Iran building a nuclear bomb, its large stockpile of near-weapons grade enriched uranium and refusal to grant my inspectors full access are cause for serious concern. For these reasons, my previous reports indicate that unless and until Iran assists the IAEA in resolving the outstanding safeguards issues, the Agency will not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful."

Earlier, in an interview to CNN, Grossi said that the IAEA had no indication of a systematic program to build a nuclear weapon.

"While there are many elements there that were of serious concern: accumulation, unjustified accumulation of huge amounts of almost military-grade material, lack of transparency in inspections, and so on, we never had information indicating that there was a structured, systematic program to build, to construct a nuclear weapon. So we have to balance the two things. Yes, many reasons for concern, but there wasn't to be a bomb tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Obviously, countries, and that is the case for the United States or Israel, and perhaps others, may have the impression that all these activities are aimed directly and straight into the manufacturing of a nuclear weapon. We from the IAEA are not in the business of judging intentions. But yes, there were reasons for concern, but these timelines are perhaps a bit subjective," he told CNN.

The IAEA DG's comments come even as US President Trump claimed that had they not targeted Iran now they would have got their hands on nuclear weapons. Trump who described the Islamist Regime as 'crazy people' who would have used a nuclear weapon had they had access to it.

"If we didn't do what we're doing right now, you would've had a nuclear war and they would've taken out many countries because you know what? They're sick people. They're mentally ill, sick people. They're angry. They're crazy. They're sick. These people are crazy -- and if they had a nuclear weapon, they would've used it," he said in a news conference on Tuesday night (local time).

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the world would be a better place once the radicals had no access to weapons of destruction.

"Iran is run by lunatics, religious fanatic lunatics. They have an ambition to have nuclear weapons. They intend to develop those nuclear weapons behind a program of missiles and drones and terrorism that the world will not be able to touch them for fear of those things. And this is the weakest they've ever been. Now is the time to go after them. The President made the decision to go after them, take away their missiles, take away their navy, take away their drones, take away their ability to make those things, so that they can never have a nuclear weapon... That's why the President made this decision. It was the right decision and the world will be a safer place when these radical clerics no longer have access to these weapons. You see how they're using them now. Imagine how they would use them a year from now if they had more of these," he said.

The conflict in the Middle East is now in Day 5 following the US and Israeli strikes on Iran that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, along with other key figures in the Persian Gulf country. In retaliation, Tehran has responded with counter-strikes targeting American military bases and other Israeli assets across the region.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is so confusing for the common person. One side says they are building a bomb, the chief inspector says there's no evidence. Who do we believe? The rhetoric from the US sounds very aggressive and unhelpful.
R
Rohit P
As an Indian, our primary concern is stability in the region. Our energy security and the safety of our diaspora are linked to the Gulf. This escalation helps no one. The IAEA should be given full access to settle this matter once and for all.
S
Sarah B
Grossi is trying to walk a very fine line. He's saying "no evidence of a bomb" but also highlighting Iran's suspicious behavior. If you have nothing to hide, why not let the inspectors in fully? Transparency is key.
V
Vikram M
The language used by Trump and Rubio is dangerous and dehumanizing. Calling entire nations "crazy" or "lunatics" is not statesmanship. It fuels hatred. The IAEA report should be the basis for policy, not inflammatory speeches.
K
Karthik V
India has good relations with both the US and Iran. We have to be pragmatic. A nuclear-armed neighbor in the west is not in our interest, but neither is a full-scale war that disrupts oil supplies and trade. A balanced approach is needed.
M
Michael C

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50