Nepal Protests China’s River Wall Construction on Border

China has been constructing a safety wall along the Bhotekoshi River on its side of the Nepal-China border, prompting strong protests from Nepal. Nepal claims the construction violates a 1963 boundary protocol requiring prior notification and prohibits unilateral changes to river courses. Officials fear the wall could alter the river's course, causing landslides and damage in Nepal, especially during monsoon season. Nepal has sent a diplomatic note to China demanding an immediate halt to the construction.

Key Points: Nepal Protests China’s Bhotekoshi River Wall Construction

  • China builds safety wall on Bhotekoshi River at Nepal border
  • Nepal protests violation of 1963 boundary protocol
  • Wall could alter river course, causing damage in Nepal
  • Nepal sends diplomatic note to halt construction
3 min read

Nepal protests as China builds safety wall on Bhotekoshi River across border

Nepal protests China building a safety wall on the Bhotekoshi River at the border, citing violation of a 1963 boundary protocol and risk of river course changes.

"Whether the construction activities carried out by the Chinese side fall under the bilateral agenda will be determined by the concerned Nepali authorities. - Ram Krishna Adhikari"

Kathmandu, April 28

China has been building a safety wall along the Bhotekoshi River on the Chinese side of the Nepal-China border, prompting strong protests from Nepal.

Nepal fears that the construction could alter the river's course and cause damage on the Nepali side. Nepali officials said the Chinese construction activities violate the boundary protocol signed between the two countries in 1963, which states that either party must inform the other in advance before constructing any structure along the international border.

The protocol also states that neither party shall attempt to change the course of boundary rivers unilaterally.

Officials from Nepal's Home Ministry confirmed to IANS that the Chinese side has been constructing a safety wall along the river within Chinese territory across the border.

The river flows through the Tatopani border point in Sindhupalchowk district and partly serves as a natural boundary between the two countries.

Chief District Officer of Sindhupalchowk, Ram Krishna Adhikari, confirmed that the Chinese side had constructed the wall on its side of the border. "Whether the construction activities carried out by the Chinese side fall under the bilateral agenda will be determined by the concerned Nepali authorities," he said.

According to a Home Ministry official, the District Administration Office in Sindhupalchowk had recently informed the government about the construction activities being carried out by the Chinese side close to the border, and the matter was subsequently forwarded to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for diplomatic action.

The Foreign Ministry then urged the Chinese side to halt the construction activities immediately, the Kathmandu Post reported on Tuesday.

Foreign Ministry officials were not immediately available for comment to IANS. However, a senior official at Nepal's Home Ministry told IANS that he had been informed that a diplomatic note had been sent to the Chinese side protesting the construction activities undertaken without notifying Nepal. "We had sent details of the construction activities carried out by the Chinese side to the Foreign Ministry," the official said.

The Bhote Koshi River lies in one of the most disaster-prone areas, and officials say that any construction along the river or attempt to alter its course could have a major impact on the Nepali side during the monsoon season. Nepal frequently experiences landslides near the border point, and international trade with China is often disrupted during the rainy season.

According to the report, the construction is being carried out near border pillar number 53 of the Nepal-China international boundary. Under the boundary protocol signed in 1963, both parties are required not to deliberately alter the course of the boundary river and to take measures to prevent such changes. The protocol further states that both sides should adopt joint measures to prevent losses, and it also includes provisions for compensation if either party causes damage across the border due to changes in the river's course.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
Understandable concern from Nepal; the Bhotekoshi is in a disaster-prone area. But China's wall might be for flood protection, which could benefit both sides. Diplomatic dialogue is key—this should be settled amicably. 🤝
J
James A
India watches this closely. Any alteration to boundary rivers can affect downstream ecosystems and communities. Nepal-China tensions over such matters show the complexity of Himalayan geopolitics. Hope both sides resolve soon.
N
Nikhil C
On one hand, China's wall could prevent landslides; on the other, Nepal's sovereignty must be respected. The 1963 protocol was signed for a reason—unilateral actions erode trust. Nepal's diplomatic note is justified. 🇳🇵🇨🇳
L
Lauren Z
I'm surprised China didn't notify Nepal, given the partnership. The river course could shift during monsoon, causing real damage. Nepal needs to be firm but also offer joint planning for disaster mitigation. Balance is necessary.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50