NewKerala.com

India Updates National Accounts Base Year to 2022-23 for Better Economic Data

The Ministry of Statistics has updated the National Accounts base year to 2022-23 to better reflect the current economy. States must adopt the new base year for compiling Gross State Domestic Product estimates. The revised framework incorporates administrative records and survey inputs for improved data reliability. The change is crucial for fiscal devolution, policy formulation, and inter-state comparisons.

Key Points: India Updates National Accounts Base Year to 2022-23

  • Base year updated to 2022-23
  • New uniform guidelines for state GDP
  • Focus on modern data sources and service sectors
  • GSDP used for fiscal devolution and policy
2 min read

MoSPI updates National Accounts base year to 2022-23, issues new framework for State GDP estimates

India revises National Accounts base year to 2022-23, introducing new framework for state GDP estimates to improve accuracy and consistency.

"more accurately capture the current structure of the economy - MoSPI release"

New Delhi, May 7

The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation has updated the base year of the National Accounts to 2022-23 stating that the revision aims to "more accurately capture the current structure of the economy" by using "modern data sources and improved estimation practices with evolving international standards."

In a release issued on Thursday, the ministry said States and Union Territories will now be required to adopt the new base year for compiling Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP), which will help ensure "greater accuracy, consistency and comparability in assessing regional economic performance."

The ministry has also finalized the Uniform Guideline for compilation of Gross State Value Added (GSVA) estimates with base year 2022-23.

According to the PIB release, the updated framework focuses on "expanding data integration," "refining methodologies," "ensuring alignment with national aggregates," and "standardizing practices" across States and Union Territories.

The ministry said the revised system will incorporate "administrative records, sectoral databases, and survey inputs to improve coverage and reliability."

It added that the updated methodologies are aimed at "better reflect(ing) the evolving economy, especially in emerging service sectors and unincorporated enterprises."

MoSPI said the changes are important because GSDP is widely used for "fiscal devolution, policy formulation, resource allocation, budgeting, performance assessment and inter-state comparisons."

The statement noted that the Finance Commission uses GSDP estimates to assess "the fiscal capacity and relative economic position of States while recommending the distribution of Central taxes among them."

The ministry further said the Department of Expenditure under the Finance Ministry uses GSDP estimates for fixing borrowing limits of states under the fiscal responsibility framework.

To guide this transition, the Advisory Committee on National Accounts Statistics (ACNAS) constituted a Sub-Committee on Regional Accounts chaired by Ravindra H Dholakia, with members from State Governments, the Reserve Bank of India, NITI Aayog, academia and research institutions.

At present, 34 States and Union Territories are compiling GSDP estimates with base year 2011-12, except Lakshadweep, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu.

MoSPI said it is making "concerted efforts to onboard all States/UTs" under the new base year framework "to ensure complete national coverage and uniformity in the compilation of Regional Accounts Statistics."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I work in state government data analysis, and this uniform guideline for GSVA is actually a big deal. Right now, different states use different methods—makes it impossible to compare apples to apples. My only concern is capacity in smaller states like the NE ones—they'll need training and time to adapt.
R
Rohit P
Hope this also forces states to improve their own data collection. Many states still rely on old surveys and incomplete records. The bit about "administrative records and sectoral databases" sounds good, but implementation will be key. Plus, with Finance Commission using this for tax devolution, states better get their numbers right!
S
Siddharth J
Smart move including Ravindra Dholakia in the sub-committee—he's a respected economist with deep knowledge of Indian states. Will be interesting to see if this captures the informal sector better. Unincorporated enterprises contribute massively to our GDP (kirana shops, street vendors, small workshops), and they've always been undercounted.
M
Michael C
As someone who follows Indian economic data from overseas, this is a positive step towards international best practices. The old 2011-12 base was outdated for a G20 economy. But I hope MoSPI also publishes a long back-series so we can track trends consistently. Otherwise, analysts will struggle to compare old and new data.
K
Kavya N
Important for tax devolution yes, but I hope states also use this for better planning—especially in health and education budgets. If GSDP numbers are more accurate, allocation to backward regions should improve. Also glad they're including Lakshadweep and Dadra & Nagar Haveli—every territory matters for inclusive growth.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50