Galgotias University Denies Claiming Chinese RoboDog as Its Own at AI Summit

Galgotias University has defended its display of a Chinese-made robotic dog at the AI Impact Summit, stating it never claimed the device as its own invention. Professor Neha Singh explained the RoboDog, named 'Orion', was brought for student research and projection, and the controversy arose from a misinterpretation. The university expressed pain over the "propaganda campaign" and emphasized its focus on providing students access to global technologies for learning. Reports suggested the institution was asked to vacate the summit expo following the allegations.

Key Points: Galgotias University Clarifies RoboDog Display at AI Summit

  • University denies ownership of Chinese RoboDog
  • Clarifies it was for student learning
  • Says controversy stems from misinterpretation
  • Faces online criticism and reports of being asked to vacate expo
4 min read

"Misinterpreted": Galgotias University claims it never sought to project 'Chinese' RoboDog as their own at AI Summit

Galgotias University defends its display of a 'Chinese' RoboDog at the AI Impact Summit, calling it a misinterpretation and denying claims of presenting it as their invention.

"We have never claimed that it is ours, Indian, or Galgotian. - Professor Neha Singh"

New Delhi, February 18

Surrounded by a huge controversy over the display of a 'Chinese' RoboDog at the AI Impact Summit, Galgotias University defended itself after it was reportedly asked to vacate the Summit. Galgotias University's Professor Neha Singh who was seen in a viral video introducing the RoboDog as 'Orion' and explaining about it the AI expo, claimed that she had never sought to present the RoboDog as the University's own.

"We have never claimed that it is ours, Indian, or Galgotian. Its main branding is still on it. The robot that had come for a particular task has gone there for the children's study, for the children's research and development. Our center, our campus -- it has gone into the children's lab. It was here for two days for projection; the projection has been completed," Professor Neha Singh told ANI.

Addressing the viral video, Singh claimed that due to one "misinterpretation", the whole controversy has got wings. She also clarified that she is a faculty member in communications at School of Management and not teaching AI.

"By one misinterpretation, the internet has gone by storm. It might be that I could not convey well what I wanted to say, or it was misunderstood. I am a faculty member in communications at the School of Management, not in AI. Only you (the media) have heard what the government has said. As far as I know, we are here at the expo. As a university, we are standing tall. The robot was brought here only for projection," Professor Neha Singh told reporters.

When asked about the charges of bringing disrepute to the country with the alleged action, the professor cited the University's record.

"Because of Galgotias, the country's name has been greatly honoured. Sir, I have said before, you should come to our university. We have given the country Paralympians. Galgotias has provided many valuable resources to the country and is contributing everywhere. Galgotias University is a very responsible institution," Neha Singh added.

In response to reports that Galgotias University was asked to vacate the India AI Impact Summit expo, Professor Dr. Aishwarya Shrivastava said she had no information regarding the development.

"As of now, we have no such information. We never claimed that we manufactured it (robodog), it was only a part of our AI investment. It got misinterpreted in a big way," Dr Aishwarya Shrivastava told ANI.

Earlier, the authorities have asked Galgotias University to vacate the AI Impact Summit Expo following allegations that the institution presented a Chinese-made robotic dog as its own invention, sources said.

The University faced severe online and offline criticism after a robot allegedly manufactured by a Chinese company was seen at the University display stall. Earlier, amid rising heat over the controversy, the institution issued an official clarification, expressing concern about "propaganda" against the university.

The University said that robotic programming is part of its endeavour to teach students to build AI applications, enabling them to develop and deploy real-world skills using globally available tools and resources.

"We at Galgotias, faculty and students, are deeply pained by the propaganda campaign against our university. We would like to clearly state that the robotic programming is part of our endeavour to make students learn AI programming and develop & deploy real world skills using globally available tools and resources, given developing AI talent is need of an hour," the statement said.

The institution said its vision focuses on student learning and innovation, providing students with access to modern technologies to gain practical experience and prepare for the future.

"Our university's vision is focused on student learning & innovation and we provide students with access to modern technologies so they can gain practical experience and prepare for the future. Spreading negativity can harm the morale of students, who are working hard to innovate, learn, and build their skills using global technologies," said the statement.

The India AI Impact Summit is a five-day programme anchored in three foundational pillars, or "Sutras": People, Planet, and Progress. Bringing together policymakers, technology companies, innovators, academia, and industry leaders, the Summit seeks to translate global AI deliberations into actionable development outcomes under the IndiaAI Mission and the Digital India initiative.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I understand the need for clarification, the optics were terrible. At a national AI summit, showcasing a Chinese product without clear disclaimers was bound to raise eyebrows. The university's PR team needs to be more careful next time.
R
Rohit P
The real issue is our dependency on foreign tech. Instead of debating who presented what, we should ask: when will we have a world-class 'Made in India' RoboDog? That's the conversation we need to have. Jai Hind!
S
Sarah B
As an academic myself, I feel for the professor. Sometimes in the excitement of an expo, communication can get fuzzy. Their point about students needing access to global tech for learning is valid. The backlash seems disproportionate.
V
Vikram M
"Misinterpretation" seems to be the go-to excuse nowadays. But why was a communications professor explaining an AI product? That itself is odd. The university's statement is stronger than the professor's initial defense.
K
Karthik V
Galgotias has produced good engineers and athletes. One incident shouldn't define them. However, at events representing India's AI mission, transparency is key. Label everything clearly next time. Lesson learned, hopefully.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50