MeitY Secy on Robodog Row: "Misinformation Cannot Be Encouraged"

Ministry of Electronics and IT Secretary S Krishnan has emphasized that misinformation cannot be encouraged, stating it is essential for a code to be followed at expos like the AI Impact Summit. His comments come after Galgotias University vacated its stall following controversy over a displayed "Chinese" robodog. The university apologized, attributing the confusion to an "ill-informed" representative who gave factually incorrect information while unauthorized to speak to the press. Registrar Nitin Kumar Gaur clarified the university did not develop the robot but purchased it for student research, suggesting a misunderstanding between the words "develop" and "development."

Key Points: MeitY Seit on Galgotias University AI Expo Robodog Controversy

  • MeitY calls for code of conduct at tech expos
  • Galgotias University vacates AI Summit stall
  • Controversy over "Chinese" robodog display
  • University apologizes for "ill-informed" representative
  • Registrar clarifies "develop" vs "development" wording
3 min read

"Misinformation cannot be encouraged, essential that a code is followed": MeitY Secy on Galgotia University's robodog controversy

MeitY Secretary S Krishnan stresses need for a code to prevent misinformation after Galgotias University vacates AI Summit stall over Chinese robodog claims.

"Misinformation cannot be encouraged. So we don't want the controversy around this. - S Krishnan"

New Delhi, February 19

Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology Secretary S Krishnan has said that they want genuine and actual work to be reflected in the way that people exhibit in expos such as AI Summit 2026 and a code should be followed.

Talking to the media here, he said misinformation cannot be encouraged.

Answering a query on Galgotias University vacating the stall at the AI Impact Expo 2026, Krishnan said he is not getting into whether they are right or wrong and "just don't want the controversy".

"We want genuine and actual work to be reflected in the way that people exhibit in expos. The idea is not to sort of use this as an opportunity in any other fashion. We don't want the controversy surrounding the exhibits presented here. So I think it's essential that a code is followed there. Misinformation cannot be encouraged. So we don't want the controversy around this. I'm not getting into whether they are right or wrong. We just don't want the controversy," he said.

The Galgotias University staff and officials on Wednesday vacated their stall at the India AI Impact Summit expo, following controversy over the display of a "Chinese" robodog.

According to sources, the authorities had asked Galgotias University to vacate its expo stall.

Galgotias University Registrar Nitin Kumar Gaur on Wednesday issued a press release on behalf of the University and apologized for the confusion created at the Al Summit.

"We at Galgotias University, wish to apologise profusely for the confusion created at the recent Al Summit. One of our representatives, manning the pavilion, was ill-informed. She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information even though she was not authorised to speak to the press," the release said.

"We request your kind understanding as there was no institutional intent to misrepresent this innovation. Galgotias University remains firmly committed to academic integrity, transparency, and responsible representation of our work. Understanding the organisers sentiment we have vacated the premises," it added.

Gaur earlier issued a clarification amid growing controversy over the display of a "Chinese" RoboDog at the AI Impact Summit.

Speaking to ANI, Gaur explained that the confusion stemmed from the use of the words "develop" and "development."

He clarified that the university did not develop the robot but had worked on its development for academic and research purposes.

"This is a jumble of two words, develop, and development. We didn't develop it. We worked on its development... We want to bring them, just like that robot was brought, and an effort was made to get students to do research on it," Gaur said.

Addressing a viral video in which Professor Neha Singh introduced the RoboDog as "Orion" during the AI expo, Gaur suggested there may have been a misunderstanding in the wording.

"I can say that perhaps she (Professor Neha) might have been confused by the words "develop" and "development" in the flow. But the truth is that we bought this robot for children's research... If China is making the claim, then maybe it (robodog) could be bought from China... I haven't received any such official communication yet (on vacating the expo)," Gaur said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While the intent to follow a code is correct, the handling seems harsh. The professor made a mistake in wording. Couldn't they have just issued a correction? Vacating the stall feels like an overreaction and discourages participation.
V
Vikram M
The registrar's clarification is confusing in itself! "We didn't develop it, we worked on its development" – what does that even mean? Sounds like typical bureaucratic jargon to cover up. Transparency is key.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, this highlights a bigger issue. Many Indian institutions buy tech from abroad for research, which is fine. But claiming it as your own innovation at a summit is not. The secretary is right to set standards.
R
Rohit P
The real problem is the "enthusiasm of being on camera" as the apology says. We need to train our academics and reps better for such events. A little media training could have avoided this entire mess.
M
Michael C
Interesting case. The focus should be on the research work done *on* the platform, not just the platform's origin. But clear communication is non-negotiable at a government expo. The code of conduct is essential.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50