Chirag Paswan Slams Galgotias University Over Chinese Robodog Claim at AI Summit

Union Minister Chirag Paswan has strongly criticized Galgotias University for falsely claiming a Chinese-made robotic dog as its own innovation at the India AI Impact Summit, calling it a "major lapse." He stated the government would decide on appropriate action after the summit concludes, emphasizing the incident harms India's image on a global platform. The university has apologized, stating its representative was "ill-informed" and not authorized to speak to the media. Shiv Sena-UBT MPs have also demanded strict action, labeling the episode a national embarrassment.

Key Points: Chirag Paswan on Galgotias University Chinese Robodog Row

  • Minister terms incident a major lapse
  • False claim made at India AI Impact Summit
  • Govt to decide action post-summit
  • University apologizes, blames miscommunication
  • MPs call for penalties against varsity
3 min read

'Major lapse': Chirag Paswan assures govt action amid Galgotias University's Chinese robodog row

Union Minister Chirag Paswan calls Galgotias University's false claim of a Chinese robotic dog a "major lapse," promises government action after AI summit.

"This is a major lapse. A university displaying something incorrect in this manner and taking ownership of it is completely wrong. - Chirag Paswan"

Patna, Feb 19

Amid the controversy involving Galgotias University over a Chinese robotic dog showcased at the India AI Impact Summit, Union Minister Chirag Paswan on Thursday termed the incident a "major lapse" and said the government would decide on further action after the summit concludes.

Interacting with reporters, Paswan said it was completely wrong for a university to display a product and falsely claim ownership of it. "This is a major lapse. A university displaying something incorrect in this manner and taking ownership of it is completely wrong," he said.

Referring to the varsity representative who spoke about the robotic dog, Paswan said she appeared to be using words carefully to justify the situation. "The person present there was trying to play with words. She claimed that it was conveyed differently and later misinterpreted. But when an AI Summit is being held in the country, such incidents become a serious matter," he added.

Paswan said the issue is a cause for concern, especially because the summit is a global platform and is being closely watched internationally. He stressed that such incidents can harm India's image in front of the world.

"The summit is still going on. After it concludes, the government will decide what action should be taken. The way this was presented has created a wrong impression in front of the whole world," he said.

Earlier in the day, Shiv Sena-UBT MPs, including Priyanka Chaturvedi and Anil Desai, questioned the role of the organisers and demanded strict action, including penalties, against the university. The MPs said the incident was not only a matter of national embarrassment but had also led to international ridicule.

In its first official reaction to the controversy on Wednesday, the Centre said it wants "genuine and actual work" to be displayed at such platforms and does not want to encourage misinformation.

The Greater Noida-based university came under heavy criticism on social media after Neha Singh, a Professor of Communications, claimed in an interview to DD News that a robotic dog displayed at the university's pavilion had been developed by its "centre of excellence". She also referred to the robotic dog as "Orion". However, it soon emerged that the product was the Unitree Go2, developed by China's Unitree Robotics.

Neha Singh later blamed miscommunication for the incident. Meanwhile, the university distanced itself from her remarks and said she was not authorised to speak to the media. In a statement, Galgotias University apologised for the confusion and claimed that the representative was "ill-informed".

"We at Galgotias University wish to apologise profusely for the confusion created at the recent AI Summit. One of our representatives, manning the pavilion, was ill-informed. She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and, in her enthusiasm on being on camera, gave factually incorrect information, even though she was not authorised to speak to the press," the institute said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While the lapse is serious, I feel the reaction is a bit over the top. Yes, it was wrong to claim ownership, but the focus should be on promoting genuine Indian AI work. Instead of just penalizing, the government should create better frameworks to support and verify indigenous tech at such events.
A
Arjun K
Absolutely shameful! 🤦‍♂️ We talk about 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' and then this happens. The university's apology seems like damage control. There must be accountability. Paswan ji is right to call it a major lapse.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in tech, this is a classic case of poor event management and lack of oversight. The professor shouldn't have spoken without authorization, but the university is ultimately responsible for what's displayed at their pavilion. Hope this leads to stricter protocols.
K
Karthik V
The real issue is our over-dependence on foreign tech, especially Chinese. We need to invest more in R&D so that our universities have actual products to showcase. Action against Galgotias is needed, but let's also build capacity.
M
Meera T
Feeling disappointed. Such summits are opportunities to attract global investment and collaboration. This kind of misinformation hurts credibility. The professor's enthusiasm is understandable, but accuracy is non-negotiable.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50