Madras HC Upholds Order for Temple Lamp Lighting on Protected Hill Site

The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court has upheld a previous order by Justice GR Swaminathan permitting the lighting of a lamp on the 'Deepathoon' at the Tirupparankundram temple. The bench emphasized that the district administration should have used the issue as an opportunity for community mediation. It ruled that any activity at the protected hill site must strictly comply with the relevant Act, with the lamp lighting and number of participants subject to consultation with the ASI. The petitioner hailed the verdict as a significant victory for Hindu devotees in Tamil Nadu.

Key Points: Madras HC Upholds Order for Deepam Lighting at Tirupparankundram

  • Court upholds earlier judicial order
  • Activity must comply with protected site laws
  • Number of devotees subject to ASI consultation
  • Ruling follows clashes over ritual practice
3 min read

Madras HC upholds Justice Swaminathan's order allowing lighting of lamps on "Deepathoon" in Tirupparankundram temple

Madras High Court upholds order allowing lamp lighting on 'Deepathoon' at Tirupparankundram temple, citing need for ASI consultation and community mediation.

"This verdict is a victory for the Hindus of Tamil Nadu and for Murugan devotees. - Petitioner Rajesh"

Chennai, January 6

The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday upheld Justice GR Swaminathan's order regarding the lighting of lamps on the "Deepathoon" in Tirupparankundram temple.

The bench, consisting of Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan, observed that the district administration ought to have treated the issue as an opportunity to bridge the gap between the communities through mediation.

It further held that, since the hill is a protected site, any activity there must strictly comply with the Act's provisions. The Court clarified that the lamp may be lit and the number of persons permitted can be fixed, subject to consultation with the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

Petitioner Rajesh called the court's order remarkable, stating that the lamp should be lit on a Deepathoon and the temple administration should make the necessary arrangements for it. He said that the arguments presented by the state government into the matter were rejected by the court.

Rajesh asserted that the verdict is a victory for Hindus in Tamil Nadu and for devotees of Murugan.

"The court has delivered a remarkable verdict. The government's appeal petition has been dismissed. The lamp should be lit on a Deepathoon and the temple administration should make the necessary arrangements for it. The arguments presented by the government today, citing the possibility of law and order issues, were rejected by the court, which observed that they reflected the government's inaction. This verdict is a victory for the Hindus of Tamil Nadu and for Murugan devotees, including students," he said.

The development is followed when over 100 INDIA bloc MPs from the Lok Sabha during the Winter session submitted a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla regarding an impeachment motion against Madras HC judge Justice Swaminathan, who ordered Subramaniya Swamy temple authorities to light a traditional lamp at a stone pillar near a dargah, atop a hillock in Tamil Nadu.

In December, unrest broke out during the Hindu festival of Karthigai Deepam when activists from right-wing groups clashed with police. The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court had earlier directed that the lamp be lit at the hilltop temple.

Acting on a petition filed by a right-wing activist, Justice GR Swaminathan had instructed state authorities to ensure that the sacred lamp was lit atop the hill. However, government officials maintained that this violated the longstanding practice of lighting the lamp at the nearby Deepa Mandapam, a ritual observed for several years.

In the first week of December 2025, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed that the petitioner along with ten others be permitted to go up to the Deepam pillar on the Thirupparankundram hilltop to light the Karthigai Deepam, while ordering the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) to provide adequate security, after it found that its earlier order on the ritual had been wilfully disobeyed.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
As a devotee, this is a relief. The lamp lighting during Karthigai Deepam is an ancient tradition. The court's insistence on following ASI guidelines while allowing the ritual shows wisdom. The government's law and order concerns sometimes feel like an excuse to avoid facilitating peaceful religious observance.
A
Arun Y
I have to respectfully disagree with framing this as a "victory for Hindus." It's a victory for due process and the rule of law. The court has simply upheld its earlier order with necessary safeguards (ASI consultation, limited people). Turning every judicial order into a communal win-loss narrative is problematic for our social fabric.
S
Sarah B
Interesting case. The key takeaway for me is the court's emphasis on the "protected site" status. Any activity, religious or otherwise, must comply with the law meant to preserve heritage. The mediation angle is also crucial—so many disputes in India could be solved with better communication from the start.
K
Karthik V
Jai Murugan! 🕯️ This is about respecting the sentiments of crores of devotees. The Deepathoon has significance. Glad the court saw through the administration's inaction. Now the temple authorities must make proper arrangements for a peaceful and dignified ceremony.
M
Meera T
The backdrop of MPs submitting an impeachment motion makes this politically charged. Justice should be blind to such pressure. Upholding the order while ensuring ASI protocols are followed seems like the most sensible middle path. Hope the ritual happens peacefully this time.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50