Madras HC Shields Kamal Haasan from Unauthorized Use of His Persona

The Madras High Court has granted veteran actor Kamal Haasan interim protection, restraining unauthorized commercial use of his persona. The order specifically bars a Chennai-based firm and other entities from selling merchandise featuring his name or image without consent. The court clarified that the injunction does not restrict legitimate creative expressions like satire or caricature. Kamal Haasan argued that his endorsements hold significant commercial value and unauthorized use could mislead the public.

Key Points: Kamal Haasan Wins Court Order Against Unauthorized Persona Use

  • Interim injunction against unauthorized merchandise
  • Restraint on Chennai firm Neeye Vidai
  • Protection of personality and publicity rights
  • Order excludes legitimate artistic expression
3 min read

Madras HC grants interim protection to Kamal Haasan against unauthorised use of his persona

Madras High Court grants interim relief to Kamal Haasan, restraining firms from commercial misuse of his name, image, and likeness without consent.

"commercial exploitation without consent could not be permitted at this stage - Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy"

Chennai, Jan 12

The Madras High Court on Monday granted interim relief to veteran actor Kamal Haasan in a John Doe suit, restraining unauthorised commercial exploitation of his personality rights, including the use of his name, image, likeness or other attributes associated with his public persona.

Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy passed the interim injunction while hearing a plea filed by the actor seeking protection against the sale of merchandise bearing his name or image without consent.

The court restrained a Chennai-based firm, Neeye Vidai, along with several other unidentified individuals and entities, from selling products such as T-shirts and shirts featuring the actor's image, name or screen titles, including "Ulaganayagan", unless expressly authorised or endorsed by him.

The restraint will remain in force until the next date of hearing.

The interim order was granted after the court was satisfied that the actor had established a prima facie case.

Senior counsel Satish Parasaran, assisted by advocate Vijayan Subramanian, appeared for the plaintiff and argued that the unauthorised commercial use of the actor's persona amounted to a clear violation of his personality and publicity rights.

Accepting the submissions, the judge observed that commercial exploitation without consent could not be permitted at this stage.

However, the court clarified that the order would not restrict legitimate creative expressions such as caricature, satire or other permissible artistic works, provided they did not amount to commercial misuse of the actor's persona.

In his plaint, Kamal Haasan stated that he is widely regarded as one of the greatest and most versatile actors in Indian cinema, known for portraying complex and diverse roles across genres, often involving significant physical and artistic transformations.

He noted that he is popularly referred to as a "cinema encyclopaedia" due to his extensive knowledge and mastery over various aspects of filmmaking.

The 71-year-old actor informed the court that he has acted in about 250 films across Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Hindi, Kannada and Bengali languages during a career spanning over 65 years.

His accolades include four National Film Awards, 20 Filmfare Awards, 11 Tamil Nadu State Film Awards, and four Nandi Awards.

He has also been honoured with the Kalaimamani Award (1978), Padma Shri (1978), Padma Bhushan (2014), and the Chevalier of the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres (2016).

The veteran actor further pointed out that he was invited in 2025 to become a member of the Actors Branch of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, in recognition of his "indelible contributions to the global filmmaking community".

He argued that his endorsements command significant commercial value and public trust, and therefore unauthorised use of his persona could mislead consumers.

After granting interim relief, the court directed the actor to issue a public notice about the order in both an English and a Tamil daily, noting that the John Doe nature of the suit required wide communication of the injunction.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Good move by Kamal sir. It's about time celebrities in India protect their personality rights legally. So many local shops sell t-shirts with actor faces without permission. Hope this sets a precedent for others too.
R
Rohit P
I appreciate that the court clarified it won't stop caricatures or satire. Freedom of artistic expression is important. But straight-up selling merchandise for profit is totally different. Balance is key.
A
Anjali F
While I understand the need to protect his image, part of me feels a bit sad. In our culture, putting up posters of favourite heroes was a form of fandom. Now everything is so commercial. Times have changed.
M
Michael C
Interesting to see Indian courts handling "John Doe" suits. The public notice requirement in Tamil and English is a smart move to ensure wider awareness. The legal system seems to be adapting well to modern IP challenges.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, I hope this doesn't become a tool to stifle small businesses or fan art. The line between commercial misuse and genuine tribute can be thin. The court's clarification gives some hope.
N
Nisha Z
His legacy is truly unparalleled! 250 films, National awards, Padma awards, and now the Academy invitation.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50