Fri, 24 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 22, 2026 · 15:15
Middle East News Updated Jul 22, 2026

Trump Adviser: Lebanon-Israel Deal Enters Implementation Phase

President Trump's senior adviser Massad Boulos announced the US-backed Lebanon-Israel agreement has entered the implementation phase, calling it a historic breakthrough. The agreement, the first between the two countries since 1949, will unfold gradually under US coordination. Boulos linked Israeli redeployment to the dismantling of Hezbollah's military presence in southern Lebanon. He emphasized the process is step-by-step, not fixed by dates, with a verification mechanism ensuring each phase is completed.

Lebanon deal is on track, claims Trump

Washington, July 21

President Donald Trump's senior adviser for Arab and Middle Eastern affairs, Massad Boulos, said on Tuesday that the US-backed agreement between Lebanon and Israel had entered the implementation phase, describing it as a historic breakthrough that would unfold gradually under close coordination among the United States, Lebanon and Israel.

Washington, July 21 (IANS) President Donald Trump's senior adviser for Arab and Middle Eastern affairs, Massad Boulos, said on Tuesday that the US-backed agreement between Lebanon and Israel had entered the implementation phase, describing it as a historic breakthrough that would unfold gradually under close coordination among the United States, Lebanon and Israel.

Speaking to reporters after Trump's White House meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Boulos said both leaders had developed "very good chemistry" during talks that focused on security, economic cooperation and support for the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF).

"There was a very good chemistry between the two presidents," Boulos said.

"It went very well. It was very productive, and they touched on some very important points, including support of the LAF and some other aspects as well, including economic cooperation and others."

Boulos said the administration's immediate priority was implementing the framework agreement signed by Lebanon and Israel, which he described as the first agreement between the two countries since the 1949 Armistice Agreement.

"This is indeed a historic agreement," he said.

"This is the first time actually the two countries have actually signed an agreement since 1949."

He cautioned, however, that implementation would be gradual rather than immediate.

"It's all about implementation," Boulos said. "It's going to take time. This is not easy. Nobody believes for a second that this is going to be an easy task in any way. It will take time, but we're determined. President Trump is absolutely determined to see this through."

Addressing questions about the redeployment of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon, Boulos said the process was proceeding according to the framework agreement through coordinated steps rather than a fixed timetable.

"There is a very good and excellent coordination actually happening as we speak between CENTCOM and the Lebanese armed forces and the IDF," he said.

"Things are moving in the right direction; we're going to see this gradual implementation."

He said the agreement incorporates a verification mechanism designed to ensure that each phase is completed before the next begins.

"There is a verification mechanism as well."

Boulos also linked Israeli redeployment to the dismantling of Hezbollah's military presence.

"There are two aspects. There's the disarmament, and then there's the withdrawal, and they go hand in hand, step by step, in sequence."

He described the use of "pilot zones" in southern Lebanon as "a brilliant concept" that allows both sides to implement the agreement in phases.

Asked about US leverage over Hezbollah, Boulos declined to discuss specific options but said the administration had multiple tools available if needed.

"There are always tools that the president has at his disposal."

For now, however, he said Washington remained focused on ensuring the agreement succeeds.

"We just see this mechanism, this framework... being implemented."

Boulos also stressed that Washington recognised only Lebanon's elected leadership as representing the country.

"President Joseph Aoun made it very clear that he represents the legitimate... representative of Lebanon and the Lebanese. So is his government," he said.

"We respect the sovereignty of Lebanon."

Rejecting suggestions that domestic political calendars could slow implementation, Boulos said the process would be driven by on-the-ground conditions rather than deadlines.

"It's not about specific dates," he said. "It's a step-by-step process."

The White House has implemented the framework agreement as a central element of its Lebanon policy. The agreement aims to expand the authority of the Lebanese Armed Forces in southern Lebanon, reduce Hezbollah's military presence and facilitate a phased Israeli redeployment under US supervision.

Boulos said the framework goes beyond military arrangements because "the two countries have recognised each other and committed to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of their respective parties"

— IANS

Reader Comments

Sneha F

Good to see some diplomatic progress in West Asia—the region needs stability. But I'm skeptical about the "gradual implementation" line. We've seen many agreements in the Middle East that got stuck in phases. As an Indian, I hope this doesn't create more chaos that could spill over into our energy security or the GCC diaspora.

Arjun K

Trump claiming a "historic breakthrough" in Lebanon while the US is busy with elections again. 😂 India should take notes—real diplomacy is about consistent engagement, not just setting up "verification mechanisms." That said, any step towards normalizing Lebanon-Israel relations is welcome if it reduces tensions. Let's hope it's not just another photo-op.

Ramesh W

Interesting timing—this comes just as the US election season heats up. The focus on "pilot zones" and "verification mechanisms" sounds more like a bureaucratic checklist than real peace. As someone who follows West Asian affairs closely, I'd say India should maintain its independent path—support stability but not be a pawn in US-Israel designs.

Priya S

Praying for peace in the region! 🙏 Israel-Lebanon relations have been rocky for decades. But isn't it ironic that the US is brokering this deal while simultaneously arming both sides? India's stance of non-interference might be boring, but at least it doesn't fuel conflicts. Hope this is genuine progress, not just election rhetoric.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked