Karnataka HC upholds police power to debit-freeze bank accounts under Section 106 BNSS without prior court order
Bengaluru, August 13
The Karnataka High Court has upheld the power of police officers to debit-freeze bank accounts during a crime investigation under Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, without obtaining prior judicial permission.
According to a press release issued by the Karnataka State Cyber Command on Wednesday, the court, presided over by Justice M Nagaprasanna, clarified that police officers are required to freeze the account during the investigation and report the action forthwith to the jurisdictional Magistrate.
The High Court also quashed earlier orders passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, directing the release of seized gold and silver and the de-freezing of bank accounts in connection with a crime registered at Koramangala Police Station.
The case involves M/s JAR Gold Retail Pvt Ltd under Sections 21(1) and 21(2) of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (BUDS) Act, 2019.
The High Court, according to the release, clearly delineated the functional boundary between statutory investigative powers and judicial adjudication under Sections 106 and 107 of the BNSS.
"Section 106 preserves property while Section 107 adjudicates attachment," the release said.
Section 106 of the BNSS provides an immediate and protective mechanism for police officers to prevent suspected funds from being siphoned off during an investigation. In contrast, Section 107 governs formal judicial attachment and permanent forfeiture.
Proceedings under Section 107 require approval from the Superintendent or Commissioner of Police, a formal application before the court, a 14-day show-cause notice and a full judicial hearing, it added.
The High Court emphasised that requiring police to obtain prior court permission before freezing every suspected account would severely hamper investigations, particularly in cases involving swift digital financial transactions.
According to the release, the court observed that victim funds could disappear before a formal judicial process is completed, leaving investigators with an attachment order over an empty account.
The judgment, therefore, affirmed that police action under Section 106 BNSS remains valid and operates independently of proceedings under Section 107.
The Karnataka State Cyber Command said the clarification is of "vital importance" to law enforcement, particularly in digital financial fraud and cybercrime investigations.
The judgment, it said, reinforces the state's ability to protect financial victims and secure suspected proceeds of crime effectively by allowing police to take immediate protective action during investigations.
The ruling also provides greater clarity on the distinction between the immediate investigative powers of police and the subsequent judicial process governing formal attachment and forfeiture of property, according to the release.
— ANI
Reader Comments
I understand the need for quick action, but what about innocent people whose accounts get frozen without any wrongdoing? My cousin's account was frozen for 6 months during a fraud investigation and he couldn't pay his EMIs. There should be a clear timeline for review.
As someone who works in banking compliance, this is a crucial ruling. The BUDS Act cases are getting rampant, and fraudsters are becoming more sophisticated. This preventive freeze mechanism is essential to protect innocent depositors' money.
The court has rightly distinguished between Section 106 and 107. One is for immediate protection, the other is for formal proceedings. Common sense finally prevailing in our legal system. Good judgment by Justice Nagaprasanna.
Read the full judgment. The court has actually been very balanced - police must report to magistrate 'forthwith' after freezing. So there is accountability. This is a practical solution for a modern problem. Digital fraud won't wait for paperwork.
This is how you handle white-collar crime! The old system was too slow. Looks like our legal framework is finally catching up with the digital age. Hopefully this will reduce the number of people falling victim to these deposit schemes frauds.
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.