Karnataka Govt Moves SC Against HC Order Lifting Bike Taxi Ban

The Karnataka government has moved the Supreme Court against a High Court order that lifted the ban on bike taxi services. The High Court had ruled that prohibiting motorcycles from operating as contract carriages violates the fundamental right to trade under Article 19(1)(g). The state argued that bike taxi operations cannot function without a formal legal framework. The court clarified that the state can regulate but not reject permits solely based on vehicle type.

Key Points: Karnataka SC Appeal Against Bike Taxi Ban Lifting

  • Karnataka govt files SC appeal against HC order lifting bike taxi ban
  • High Court ruled state cannot deny permits solely for motorcycles
  • Court cited Article 19(1)(g) protecting right to trade
  • State retains authority to regulate but not ban bike taxis
  • Appeal filed against ANI Technologies, Ola, Uber, Rapido
2 min read

Karnataka govt moves SC against High Court order lifting bike taxi ban

Karnataka govt challenges High Court order lifting bike taxi ban, arguing motorcycles cannot operate without regulatory framework.

"Prohibiting motorcycles from operating as contract carriages amounted to an unreasonable restriction on the fundamental right to trade and profession under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. - Division Bench of Karnataka High Court"

Bengaluru, April 28

The Karnataka Government has approached the Supreme Court challenging a recent judgment of the Karnataka High Court that lifted the ban on bike taxi services.

The appeal has been filed against ANI Technologies and other cab aggregators. The appeal, filed last week, is yet to be listed for hearing before the apex court.

It may be noted that the High Court had ruled that the State cannot deny permits solely on the ground that the vehicle is a motorcycle.

The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C. M. Joshi while hearing appeals filed by taxi aggregators, including Ola, Uber and Rapido.

The Bench, headed by Justice B. Shyam Prasad, set aside an earlier April 2025 order passed by a single judge that had directed bike taxi operations to be halted until the State framed a comprehensive regulatory policy.

In that order, the court had observed that bike taxi services could not operate in the absence of a formal legal framework.

Challenging the single-judge ruling, cab aggregators and driver associations had argued that such a restriction adversely impacted livelihoods.

The Division Bench to this contention opined that prohibiting motorcycles from operating as contract carriages amounted to an unreasonable restriction on the fundamental right to trade and profession under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

It further noted that motorcycles fall within the definition of "transport vehicles" under the Motor Vehicles Act and therefore cannot be excluded from consideration for permits as taxis.

However, the Court clarified that the State retains the authority to regulate bike taxi operations and impose conditions under Section 74(2) of the Act, but cannot reject applications solely because the vehicle is a motorcycle.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sneha F
Honestly, I get why the government is worried about safety — no helmet rules sometimes, rash driving — but banning completely is too harsh. Why can't they just make rules instead of dragging this to SC? Hope the court strikes a balance.
M
Michael C
Interesting case. As someone who's worked in policy, I think the Karnataka govt has a point about needing a regulatory framework first. But the High Court's constitutional reasoning is solid — you can't just deny someone a livelihood based on vehicle type. Let's see what the SC decides.
R
Rahul R
I'm a Rapido rider and this ban uncertainty is killing us. One week we can work, next week we can't. The government should just license us like auto rickshaws instead of wasting court time. Common sense yaar! 🏍️
L
Lakshmi X
As a mother of a college student, I'm worried about safety. These bike taxis zoom through traffic without proper checks. But I also understand the need for affordable transport in Bengaluru. The court is right — regulate, don't ban. Make it safer for everyone.
D
Deepak U
The High Court's reasoning on Article 19(1)(g) is brilliant — you can't ban a business just because you haven't made rules yet. The state needs to get its act together and frame regulations fast. Till then, let people earn their roti!
J

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50