NewKerala.com

Parliament Panel Weighs Bill to Auto-Remove Ministers After 30-Day Arrest

A Joint Parliamentary Committee, chaired by BJP MP Aparajita Sarangi, heard expert views on three key bills aimed at political accountability. The flagship Constitution Amendment Bill, introduced by Home Minister Amit Shah, mandates the automatic removal of a Prime Minister, Chief Minister, or any minister if they are arrested and detained for 30 consecutive days on serious charges. The government describes the legislative package as crucial for cleansing politics, while opposition parties have raised concerns about potential misuse and infringement on federal principles. The committee is conducting wide stakeholder consultations before submitting its final report to Parliament.

Key Points: JPC Hears Views on Bill to Remove Arrested Ministers

  • Bill mandates auto-removal after 30-day arrest
  • Applies to PM, CMs, Union Ministers
  • Extends to J&K and Puducherry
  • Opposition cites misuse concerns
2 min read

JPC hears expert views on key constitutional, J&K Amendment Bills​

A parliamentary committee consults experts on a bill mandating automatic removal of PM, CMs, or ministers arrested for 30+ days on serious charges.

"a major step towards cleansing politics, upholding constitutional morality - Government"

New Delhi, April 1

The Joint Committee of Parliament on the Constitution Bill, 2025 and two allied bills on Wednesday continued its stakeholder consultations by hearing representations from prominent legal and academic institutions.​

The committee, chaired by BJP MP Aparajita Sarangi (Bhubaneswar), heard the views of representatives from the Centre for Law and Policy Research, Bengaluru, and OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat (Haryana).​

The session focused on three significant pieces of legislation: the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025; the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025; and the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025.​

Introduced in the Lok Sabha by Union Home Minister Amit Shah on August 20, 2025, the 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill seeks to amend Articles 75, 164, and 239AA of the Constitution. ​

Its core provision mandates the automatic removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, or any Minister (at the Centre, states, or Delhi) if they are arrested and detained for 30 consecutive days on charges punishable with imprisonment of five years or more. ​

If the Prime Minister or Chief Minister fails to advise the President or Governor for removal by the 31st day, the minister automatically ceases to hold office. The person can, however, be reappointed after release.​

The two allied bills extend similar accountability measures to Puducherry (through amendment to the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963) and to Jammu & Kashmir (by amending the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019).​

The government has described the package as a major step towards cleansing politics, upholding constitutional morality, and preventing ministers from running governments while in custody.​

The Joint Committee, comprising 31 members, was constituted in November 2025 to conduct detailed scrutiny amid intense political debate. ​

Several opposition parties had raised concerns that the bill could be misused against political rivals, undermine the presumption of innocence, and affect federal principles.​

The panel has been consulting a wide range of stakeholders, including state governments, civil society organisations, and legal experts. Wednesday's hearing was part of an ongoing series of consultations examining the constitutional, legal, and practical implications of the proposed amendments.​

The committee is expected to submit its report to Parliament after considering all inputs. ​

The development comes as Parliament continues to deliberate on measures to address the long-standing issue of criminalisation in politics while balancing democratic rights and the rule of law.​

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While the intent is good, I share the opposition's concern about misuse. What if a ruling party gets rivals arrested on flimsy charges just to remove them? The 'presumption of innocence' is a cornerstone of our justice system. This needs very careful drafting.
R
Rohit P
Finally! A bill with teeth. No one should run the country or a state from a jail cell. This applies to all, including J&K and Puducherry, which is the right approach. Kudos for consulting experts from CLPR and Jindal University. 🙏
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see India tackling political accountability head-on. The 30-day trigger seems reasonable, but the reappointment clause is crucial. It prevents permanent disqualification based on an arrest alone. The stakeholder consultations are a positive sign.
V
Vikram M
The inclusion of J&K in this framework is significant. It shows the government is serious about applying the same standards of accountability across all Union Territories. This should have been done long ago. Hope the committee submits its report soon.
K
Karthik V
Good move in principle, but the devil is in the details. Who defines "charges punishable with 5 years or more"? The police? This could become a political tool. The JPC must build strong safeguards against arbitrary arrests. Our democracy depends on it.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50