Japanese Encephalitis causes seven deaths in Assam; surveillance stepped up
Guwahati, June 18
The National Health Mission, Assam, on Thursday clarified that Acute Encephalitis Syndrome and Japanese Encephalitis are distinct medical conditions and should not be reported interchangeably, while confirming that the state has recorded 35 Japanese Encephalitis cases and seven related deaths so far this year.
The clarification came amid reports that allegedly presented AES and JE figures together, leading to confusion over the actual disease burden in the state.
According to NHM Assam, Japanese Encephalitis is one of the causes of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome, but not all AES cases are JE cases.
The mission stressed that separate reporting of the two conditions is essential to ensure accurate public understanding of the disease situation.
Data available with the National Centre for Vector Borne Disease Control (NCVBDC) show that Assam has reported 35 confirmed JE cases and seven deaths due to the mosquito-borne disease up to June 17, 2026.
In contrast, the figures of 470 cases and 32 deaths that have appeared in some reports relate to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome and should not be interpreted as Japanese Encephalitis cases or fatalities, NHM Assam said.
"The reporting of AES and JE figures without proper distinction may create misunderstanding among the public. While JE is one of the important causes of AES, the two are not synonymous," an NHM Assam official said.
NHM Assam also highlighted the state government's preparedness measures ahead of the annual AES-JE season, which typically witnesses a rise in cases during the monsoon months.
Officials said surveillance activities have been intensified across districts, while healthcare facilities have been directed to strengthen case management and treatment protocols.
Efforts are also underway to enhance vaccination coverage in vulnerable areas and improve inter-departmental coordination for disease control.
The health mission appealed to media organisations, stakeholders and the public to rely on verified data and report AES and JE figures separately to avoid misinformation and unnecessary panic.
— IANS
Reader Comments
Good to see NHM taking proactive steps to correct misinformation. But why wait for these deaths every year? We need permanent solutions - better mosquito control, clean water drainage, and awareness campaigns in villages. Government should allocate more funds for preventive healthcare. 📢
Honestly, whether it's AES or JE, the fact remains that poor rural communities in Assam are suffering. Every year same story - monsoon comes, cases rise, some deaths happen, then temporary measures. Need long-term infrastructure improvement and accessible healthcare in remote areas. Jai Hind. ✊
I appreciate the distinction they're making - medical accuracy matters. But 7 deaths from JE alone is still concerning. As a public health researcher, I'd like to see more data on which districts are affected and how vaccination coverage varies. Transparency helps build trust.
Ye government every year gives same statement but ground reality different. In my village, people still rely on quacks because PHC is 20 km away. Need to strengthen primary healthcare first, then worry about terminology. Lives are more important than labels. 😤
Respectful criticism: While correction of facts is good, NHM should also share practical steps people can take at home - like using mosquito nets, clearing stagnant water, and recognizing early symptoms. Awareness at grassroots level saves more lives than any press release. Stay safe, Assam. 🤝
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.