US Blocks Hormuz, Vance Accuses Iran of "Economic Terrorism" Over Nukes

US Vice President JD Vance has accused Iran of being willing to engage in "economic terrorism" worldwide, arguing this makes preventing it from obtaining nuclear weapons critical. He fully endorsed former President Donald Trump's fundamental position that Iran can never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Vance noted the recent high-level talks between the US and Iran were a positive historic step, but progress depends entirely on Tehran's willingness to commit. He emphasized the ball is in Iran's court, requiring a "conclusive commitment" from them not to develop nuclear arms for any deal to move forward.

Key Points: US VP Vance: Iran Engages in "Economic Terrorism," Blocks Nuclear Arms

  • Vance fully agrees with Trump's no-nukes for Iran stance
  • Accuses Iran of willingness for global economic terrorism
  • Says recent high-level US-Iran talks were a historic positive
  • States any deal requires Iran's conclusive commitment against nukes
2 min read

"Iran willing to engage in economic terrorism," says JD Vance as US blocks Hormuz

US VP JD Vance aligns with Trump, says Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, accuses it of global economic terrorism. Talks hinge on Tehran's commitment.

"If they're willing to engage in economic terrorism on the entire world, what leverage would they have if they had a nuclear bomb? - JD Vance"

Washington DC, April 14

US Vice President JD Vance in an interview with Fox News said on Monday that Iran was willing to engage in economic terrorism around the world.

Vance said he seconds US President Donald Trump and said Iran cannot have nuclear weapon.

"I 100% agree with US President Donald Trump on the fact that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon... If they're willing to engage in economic terrorism on the entire world, what would it mean -- what leverage would they have -- if they had a nuclear bomb in Tehran?" he said.

Vance said that the positive part is that the US and Iran met and discussed the contentions.

"I think it was the first time that you'd ever seen the Iranian government, the U.S. government meet at such a high level, maybe in the history of the current leadership of Iran. So that's, I think, a positive--and again, we did make some progress in the negotiation," he said.

He added, "What Trump has said is number one, Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. So, all of our red lines flow from that fundamental premise."

Vance has said that any further negotiations with Iran over a nuclear deal depend entirely on Tehran's willingness to engage, reiterating that the onus lies on the Iranian side to move the talks forward, CNN reported.

"It's a question that would be best put to the Iranians because the ball really is in their court," Vance told Fox News' Bret Baier on Monday, as quoted by CNN.

Vance emphasised that the US requires a "conclusive commitment" from Iran not to develop a nuclear weapon.

"We must have their conclusive commitment not to develop a nuclear weapon. And I think that if the Iranians are willing to meet us there, then this can be a very, very good deal for both countries. If they're not willing to meet us there, that's up to them," he said.

He further noted that the Iranian delegation that participated in recent talks in Pakistan did not have the authority to finalise an agreement, prompting the US team to leave after 21 hours of negotiations.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Another day, another strong statement from the US. But where is the consistency? One administration makes a deal, the next tears it up. How can any country negotiate in good faith with such uncertainty? The ball might be in Iran's court, but the US keeps changing the rules of the game.
A
Aman W
As an Indian, my primary concern is stability in the region and uninterrupted oil flow. These talks breaking down after 21 hours is not a good sign. Hope diplomacy prevails. The Chabahar Port partnership is too important for us to get caught in this crossfire.
S
Sarah B
The language is very aggressive. "Economic terrorism" is a loaded term. While preventing nuclear proliferation is a global goal, this approach feels more about imposing maximum pressure than finding a lasting solution. The world needs calm heads, not more fiery rhetoric.
V
Vikram M
The US says the onus is on Iran, but what about the onus on the US to provide credible security guarantees? If you keep calling a country part of an "axis of evil," can you blame them for wanting a deterrent? Complex situation, but one-sided demands won't work. Jai Hind.
K
Karthik V
Honestly, this is a reminder why India must be Atmanirbhar (self-reliant) in energy. Our economy cannot be held hostage to tensions in the Middle East. Solar, wind, nuclear – we need to go all in. 🇮🇳💪

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50