Iran Vows 'Whatever It Takes' Retaliation After US Strike Kills Khamenei

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has condemned the US military strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as an act of aggression, vowing that Tehran will defend itself "whatever it takes." He framed Iran's potential response as legitimate self-defence under international law, offering no hint of de-escalation or negotiation. Meanwhile, US lawmakers like Senator Tom Cotton indicated a continued, methodical campaign targeting Iran's missile capabilities. With Khamenei dead, Iran enters a period of political transition, but its official stance remains defiant and uncompromising.

Key Points: Iran Vows Retaliation After US Strike Kills Supreme Leader

  • Iran condemns US strike as unlawful aggression
  • Vows open-ended self-defence "whatever it takes"
  • US lawmakers signal continued military campaign
  • Iran enters leadership transition after Khamenei's death
2 min read

Iran vows self-defence 'whatever it takes'

Iran's foreign minister condemns US strikes as aggression, vows self-defence "whatever it takes" after Ayatollah Khamenei's death.

"We are defending ourselves, whatever it takes. - Abbas Araghchi"

Washington, March 1

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday condemned the US strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, calling them unlawful aggression and signalling that Tehran will respond without compromise.

Speaking to ABC News, Araghchi rejected Washington's justification outright.

"What the United States is doing is an act of aggression. What we are doing is the act of self-defence," he said.

The statement lays out Iran's diplomatic and legal position - casting the United States as the aggressor and framing Tehran's response as legitimate under international law.

Araghchi offered no hint of de-escalation.

"We are defending ourselves, whatever it takes," he said.

The language signals open-ended retaliation authority. Araghchi did not outline a timeline. He did not specify targets. He did not indicate readiness for negotiations.

His remarks come as US officials describe an ongoing campaign aimed at degrading Iran's missile infrastructure. But Araghchi did not acknowledge damage to Iran's military capabilities. Nor did he suggest instability within the political system following Khamenei's death.

American lawmakers, meanwhile, signalled that operations would continue.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton said the coming days would see "a methodical and systematic focus on Iran's missiles, its missile launchers, and ultimately its missile manufacturing capability."

He also warned, "There's no doubt, though, that Iran is going to continue to target our bases in the region, our Arab friends, and Israel."

Other US leaders questioned the intelligence basis of the strike. Senator Mark Warner said, "There was no imminent threat to the United States."

He added, "We have had very little visibility into what happens next after the supreme leader is eliminated."

Senator Adam Schiff also criticised the scale of the action, saying, "There was simply no basis to go in with this massive military campaign, with the goal of regime change."

With its supreme leader dead, Iran now enters a period of transition. Under its constitution, the Assembly of Experts is responsible for selecting a successor, though the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps holds significant influence within the system.

For now, Tehran's message remains defiant. Araghchi's words leave little ambiguity: Iran does not view itself as defeated - and any response, in his phrase, will come "whatever it takes."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
A complete mess. Iran will retaliate, that's guaranteed. And when they do, it's countries like India with large diaspora in the Gulf that will suffer. Our government needs to urgently talk to both sides and call for restraint. Our citizens' safety is paramount. 🙏
A
Arjun K
Frankly, the US Senator is right. What was the imminent threat? This looks like an act of war for regime change, not self-defence. It will destabilize the whole region and oil prices will shoot up, affecting our economy. Very shortsighted by Washington.
S
Sarah B
Watching from Delhi. Iran's "whatever it takes" rhetoric is worrying. They have proxies across the Middle East. This won't stay contained. India's foreign policy team has their work cut out to navigate this. Hoping for diplomacy to prevail, but it looks bleak.
V
Vikram M
The real concern is who takes over in Iran now. The Revolutionary Guards might grab more power, making the country even more hardline. That's bad for regional stability and for India's Chabahar port project. Our strategic investments are at risk.
K
Karthik V
While I don't support Iran's regime, you have to understand their position. Imagine if a foreign power assassinated our PM? The response would be furious. The US action is a violation of sovereignty, plain and simple. International law seems to apply only to the weak.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50