US Claims Iran Had "11 Bombs Worth" of Uranium, Shaping Military Strike

The White House claims recent negotiations revealed Iran possessed enough highly enriched uranium for "11 bombs' worth" of nuclear material. A senior official stated Iran held 460kg of uranium enriched to 60% purity, which could be refined to weapons-grade in a matter of days. US negotiators alleged Iran was stockpiling reactor fuel and delaying talks to preserve its nuclear program's building blocks. These findings were cited as pivotal in shaping the decision to launch military action against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Key Points: US: Iran Had Uranium for 11 Nuclear Bombs Before Strike

  • Iran held 460kg of 60% enriched uranium
  • Material could be weapons-grade in under 10 days
  • US offered free nuclear fuel, Iran refused
  • Talks revealed stockpiling, not medical isotope production
  • US says Iran was delaying diplomacy
4 min read

Iran talks revealed '11 bombs worth' uranium: US

White House reveals Iran held 460kg of 60% enriched uranium, described as "11 bombs' worth," a key factor in the decision for military action.

"Our 460 kilograms of 60 per cent is very, very close to the 90 per cent enrichment level that would qualify it as weapons grade. - Senior Trump Administration Official"

Washington, March 4

Tehran possessed enough highly enriched uranium for "11 bombs worth of nuclear material," the White House claimed, arguing that the findings from recent talks helped shape President Donald Trump's decision to launch military action against Iranian nuclear facilities.

According to a senior Trump Administration Official, familiar with the recent rounds of negotiations with Iran, Tehran currently holds about 10,000 kilograms of enriched uranium across multiple facilities, including 460 kilograms enriched to 60 per cent purity - material he described as dangerously close to weapons-grade.

"Our 460 kilograms of 60 per cent is very, very close to the 90 per cent enrichment level that would qualify it as weapons grade," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "And we know, and you know, and the Europeans know that that is essentially 11 bombs' worth of nuclear material."

Two Senior Trump Administration Officials, familiar with the three rounds of negotiations with Iran, which collapsed last week, asserted that the talks convinced them that Tehran was delaying diplomacy while preserving key components of its nuclear programme.

The second Senior Trump Administration Official said the Iranian delegation repeatedly avoided presenting a detailed proposal during negotiations and appeared to be seeking time.

"It was very clear they were just trying to buy time in order to preserve whatever they could... to get to a nuclear weapon," the official said.

According to the Senior Trump Administration Official, Iran's stockpile included roughly 1,000 kilograms of uranium enriched to 20 per cent and about 8,500 kilograms enriched to 3.67 per cent - levels that could potentially be further refined to weapons-grade material.

"To break out from a 3.67 enrichment level and get to 90 per cent weapons grade could be in the neighbourhood of two and a half to three months," the official said, adding that material already enriched to 60 per cent could reach weapons grade in "maybe a week, maybe at most 10 days."

US negotiators said one of the most troubling discoveries during the talks involved the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). Iranian officials claimed the facility was producing medical isotopes for civilian use, but American negotiators said the explanation did not match the available data.

The official said analysis during the meeting suggested Iran had accumulated a "seven to eight years supply of fuel" at the reactor and was not producing isotopes as claimed.

"We discovered... that they basically had not been making any radioisotopes, and the seven to eight years supply of fuel that they had been retaining... was being stockpiled," the official said.

The official said Iran had also insisted that uranium enrichment was its "inalienable right," rejecting a US offer to provide nuclear fuel for civilian reactors.

"We'll give you free nuclear fuel for as long as you want, at no cost," the second Administration Official recalled proposing during talks, adding that Iranian officials rejected the offer, saying it would be "an assault on our dignity."

Officials argued that these developments convinced the US administration that Iran's programme retained the building blocks needed to produce nuclear weapons quickly.

"They basically offered us a lot of political wins... but they were unwilling to give up the building blocks of what they needed to preserve in order to get to a bomb," the second Senior Trump Administration official said.

The officials said Iran also resisted transparency measures, including allowing inspectors to take a proposed nuclear framework back for technical review.

The briefing came as Washington continues military operations against Iranian nuclear infrastructure following what the administration described as intelligence indicating Tehran's programme was nearing a dangerous threshold.

Iran has long maintained that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, while Western governments have accused it of pursuing the capability to develop nuclear weapons.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
The numbers are alarming - 460kg at 60% purity? That's not for medical isotopes, that's a clear red flag. The offer for free nuclear fuel was a good one. Rejecting it by calling it an assault on dignity when the world is worried about bombs shows their true intentions.
R
Rahul R
As an Indian, I'm worried about the fallout. Our Chabahar port project and oil imports could be hit. But we cannot ignore the proliferation risk. The international community, including India, should push for a peaceful resolution. Military action often creates more problems than it solves.
S
Sarah B
The part about stockpiling 7-8 years of reactor fuel while claiming to produce medical isotopes is the most damning. That's not how a peaceful program operates. Transparency is non-negotiable with nuclear technology.
A
Aman W
While the evidence seems strong, I have to ask: is this the full picture? The US has a history of intelligence failures. I hope India's foreign ministry is doing its own assessment and not just following Washington's lead. We need an independent stance for our national interest.
K
Karthik V
The timeline is scary - "maybe a week" to weapons grade from 60% enrichment? This isn't a theoretical threat anymore. The world can't afford another nuclear power in such a volatile region. Hope our government is prepared for any economic or security ripple effects.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50