Iran rejects US VP's claims of Tehran allowing nuclear inspectors, says interactions with IAEA based on "safeguards agreements"
Tehran, June 23
Iran has pushed back against claims made by US Vice President JD Vance that Tehran had agreed to allow international nuclear inspectors into the country, with Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei stating that the country's engagement with the International Atomic Energy Agency would continue strictly under existing safeguards obligations and domestic legal frameworks.
Speaking to Iran's state-run news agency IRNA on Monday, following the recent US-Iran technical talks held in Switzerland, Baqaei responded to Vance's remarks, stating that the interaction with the United Nations nuclear watchdog will be based on the "Safeguards Agreements" between Tehran and the IAEA.
"Iran's interactions with the Agency, in accordance with Iran's obligations under the Safeguards Agreements, will continue according to existing procedures and comply with the laws enacted by the Islamic Consultative Assembly and the decisions of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC)," Baqaei told IRNA.
His remarks came after Vance, following the talks, claimed that Iran had agreed to permit nuclear inspectors to enter the country as part of progress achieved during negotiations between Washington and Tehran.
Speaking to reporters at the Burgenstock resort in Switzerland on Monday, the US Vice President described the first day of talks as "very, very good" and said the discussions had laid the groundwork for a possible final agreement.
"We laid a very good foundation for a successful final deal," Vance said, adding, "The final deal is the house... We haven't built the house, but we've laid a successful foundation to get to a good place for the American people."
Vance had also stated that Iran was allowing nuclear inspectors into the country and said inspection mechanisms would be strengthened to ensure that Tehran could not develop nuclear weapons.
The diplomatic discussions in Switzerland are aimed at addressing longstanding tensions between the two countries, including Iran's nuclear programme, uranium enrichment activities and broader regional security concerns.
However, according to sources familiar with the talks cited by IRNA, Iran did not engage in discussions related to its nuclear programme during the negotiations and did not agree to any new commitments.
The sources further said that any future nuclear negotiations under the 14-point Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), which seeks to resolve the conflict between Iran and the United States in West Asia, would depend on the implementation of Paragraph 13 of the agreement.
The differing accounts from Washington and Tehran underscore the challenges that remain as both sides attempt to advance diplomatic efforts and reach a broader understanding on contentious nuclear and security issues.
— ANI
Reader Comments
Seems like JD Vance is trying to project success from the talks, but Iran's response makes it clear nothing new was agreed upon. The US has a habit of claiming progress that hasn't actually materialized. Interesting how Iran says they didn't even discuss their nuclear programme - that's a major red flag for the whole negotiation.
Honestly, every time the US and Iran talk, it's like watching a drama serial that never ends. Same script, different season. Iran knows exactly what its red lines are - domestic law and SNSC decisions. The Americans need to understand that Tehran won't bend just because they claim 'progress' in the media. India should maintain its independent relationship with Iran regardless of these talks. 🇮🇳
I'd like to hear more about what was actually discussed in those technical talks. If both sides are giving contradictory statements, it doesn't inspire confidence. Iran has a right to civilian nuclear energy, but transparency around enrichment levels matters for global non-proliferation. The 14-point MoU framework sounds promising if implemented properly.
One thing is clear - the US needs a deal for its own political reasons, and Iran is in no rush. Vance trying to claim Iran agreed to inspections without them actually agreeing is amateur hour diplomacy. The SNSC holds the real power in Tehran, and they won't compromise on sovereignty. India should learn from Iran's negotiating tactics - never give in to pressure masquerading as negotiation. 💪
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.