Iran Never Wanted Nukes, Says FM Araghchi Amid US Enriched Uranium Deadlock

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi stated that Iran has never wanted nuclear weapons, reaffirming its peaceful nuclear agenda. He admitted that negotiations with the US over enriched uranium have hit a deadlock, with both sides postponing the issue. Araghchi praised the Chabahar Port as a golden gate for India to access Central Asia and Europe. He also suggested India could play a greater role in Persian Gulf security.

Key Points: Iran FM Admits Nuclear Deadlock with US on Enriched Uranium

  • Iran FM asserts country never sought nuclear weapons
  • Enriched uranium talks with US at a deadlock
  • Chabahar Port hailed as golden gate for India's access to Central Asia
  • Iran open to Russian mediation and confidence-building measures
3 min read

"Iran never wanted nuclear weapons": FM Araghchi admits enriched uranium "deadlock" with Washington

Iran's FM Araghchi says Tehran never wanted nuclear weapons, admits enriched uranium talks with US are in deadlock, and praises Chabahar Port as a golden gate for India.

"Iran has never wanted nuclear weapons, and we proved that when we signed the deal in 2015. - Seyyed Abbas Araghchi"

New Delhi, May 15

Asserting that Tehran has "never wanted nuclear weapons," Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi on Friday reaffirmed his country's commitment to a peaceful nuclear agenda, admitting that critical negotiations with Washington over enriched uranium have hit a temporary stalemate.

Addressing a press conference during his visit to the national capital for the 18th BRICS Foreign Ministers' Meeting, Araghchi maintained that Iran's strategic stance remains consistent with the 2015 nuclear agreement with the US; however, Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from the deal during his first term in 2018, labelling it "defective".

"Iran has never wanted nuclear weapons, and we proved that when we signed the deal in 2015," Araghchi stated.

He further emphasised, "We have said time and again that we don't want nuclear weapons, and this is not our policy. We have a peaceful nuclear programme, and we have always remained ready to build this confidence."

In line with this stance, the Iranian Foreign Minister indicated that Tehran remains willing to engage in confidence-building measures, reiterating, "This programme is peaceful, and we remain peaceful."

However, Araghchi did not shy away from the friction points in the ongoing dialogue with the United States.

He identified the management of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as a primary bone of contention, leading both sides to essentially freeze the issue for now.

"The subject of our enriched material is a very complicated one," he explained.

"We have come to a conclusion with the Americans that, since it is very difficult, we are almost in a deadlock on this particular question. Let's postpone it to the later stages of our negotiations," he said.

While the matter is currently "not under discussion" and "not on the negotiations," the Iran Foreign Minister hinted at potential "more consultations" with Kremlin could break the impasse.

"Obviously, we will have more consultations with Russia, and we will see if the Russians can help or not. This is not something for the time being," Araghchi added.

Shifting focus to regional connectivity in response to a question from ANI regarding the progress of the Chabahar Port, Araghchi hailed the project as "one of the symbols of cooperation between Iran and India."

Despite the shadow of US sanctions causing historical delays, he expressed high optimism for the corridor's future, noting, "I am confident that this port would be like a golden gate for India to access Central Asia, the Caucasus, and then Europe."

Beyond infrastructure, Araghchi further suggested that New Delhi, backed by its "good reputation," is uniquely positioned to play a "greater role" in fostering peace and security within the Persian Gulf.

Underscoring the depth of the bilateral partnership, he noted that the bond is "rooted in history, political, economic and cultural relations," affirming that Tehran remains "determined to continue our good relations with India."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I have mixed feelings. On one hand, Iran says they don't want nukes, but enriched uranium stockpile is a real concern. The "deadlock" just shows how complicated this is. But India should maintain good ties with Iran—Chabahar is too important for our trade with Central Asia.
J
James A
Trust but verify. Iran's history with nuclear enrichment is murky at best. The "peaceful" claim is getting old. Washington's skepticism is justified, especially after Iran's past violations. That said, India-Iran cooperation on Chabahar makes strategic sense for both.
V
Vikram M
Classic diplomatic speak! 😅 "Let's postpone it" is code for "we have no clue how to solve this." But honestly, if Iran genuinely wants peaceful nukes, they need more transparency. The US needs to stop threatening sanctions every time. India should play mediator—we have good ties with both.
A
Ananya R
Iran's consistent position is clear—they don't want weapons. But the US keeps moving goalposts. Trump's withdrawal in 2018 was a disaster. Now they're stuck on enriched uranium. Chabahar port is a game-changer for India's connectivity—hope sanctions don't ruin it again.
S
Sarah B
Iran's claim of "peaceful" nuclear program is about as believable as North Korea's. The deadlock shows they're hiding something. US should push for stricter inspections. India needs to be careful—don't get too close to Iran and risk US sanctions on Chabahar.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50