Gulf Allies Warn US: Iran Missiles Pose "Serious Threat" to Bases

American allies in the Persian Gulf have warned Washington that Iran's missile capabilities remain a serious threat to U.S. interests and military installations in the region. An assessment found that core elements of Iran's missile program are intact and some capacities have been restored since the conflict with Israel. Gulf states, including the UAE and Saudi Arabia, have signaled reluctance to be drawn into a confrontation, denying the U.S. use of their territory for operations against Iran. Despite rising rhetoric, diplomatic efforts for a framework for talks between Tehran and Washington are reportedly progressing.

Key Points: Iran Missile Threat to US Bases, Gulf Allies Warn Washington

  • Iran's missile forces remain intact
  • Capable of striking US bases in Gulf
  • Gulf states deny use of territory against Iran
  • Missiles relocated to hardened sites
  • Diplomatic talks continue amid tensions
4 min read

Iran missiles pose "serious threat" to US bases, Gulf allies warn Washington

Gulf allies warn the US that Iran's missile arsenal poses a serious threat to American bases and troops in the region, despite recent conflicts.

"It is not possible to reach and damage these capabilities easily. - Amir Mousawi"

Washington DC, February 2

American allies in the Persian Gulf have cautioned Washington that Iran's missile capabilities pose "a serious threat" to US interests in West Asia, even as regional partners intensify diplomatic efforts to prevent a wider conflict with potentially devastating consequences.

Iranian state broadcaster Press TV reported, citing a Sunday report by The Washington Post, that two Western officials familiar with the matter said Persian Gulf allies had warned the US that Tehran still retains key military capabilities, including the ability to strike American targets such as bases and troop concentrations across the region.

The report added that a recent assessment carried out by a US ally in the Persian Gulf found that, despite claims of damage to Iran's missile forces during last June's 12-day war with Israel, core elements of the programme remain intact, with some capacities already restored, underscoring persistent vulnerabilities across the region.

According to the assessment, Iran continues to possess shorter-range missiles, launchers, and parts of its missile production infrastructure, systems capable of reaching more than a dozen US military installations in the Persian Gulf, where tens of thousands of American troops are deployed. These findings have reinforced concerns in Washington that Iran could still mount effective retaliatory strikes should tensions escalate further.

Against this backdrop, US partners in the region have signalled reluctance to be drawn into any military confrontation. Press TV noted that last month, both the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia informed Washington that US forces would not be allowed to use their territory or airspace for operations against Iran, highlighting growing unease among Gulf states over becoming direct participants in a potential conflict.

Providing further insight into Iran's preparedness, Amir Mousawi, a former Iranian diplomat now based in Iraq, told the Post that Tehran has stepped up missile production since the conflict with Israel and repaired several damaged launch systems. He added that some launchers have been relocated to mountainous terrain, complicating efforts to neutralise them.

"Iran has mountains thousands of meters high," Mousawi said. "It is not possible to reach and damage these capabilities easily."

Echoing these concerns, David Des Roches, a former Pentagon official affiliated with the Thayer Marshall Institute, said Iran maintains the largest missile arsenal in West Asia. He noted that Tehran has more missiles than the combined interceptor stocks of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council states, adding that regional air defence systems remain only partially integrated and largely concentrated around limited sites, leaving them exposed to saturation attacks.

Iran's military posture has increasingly shaped US calculations as Washington expands its footprint in the region. US President Donald Trump had earlier threatened military action against Iran following recent economic protests inside the country, which Tehran said were quickly exploited by foreign-backed rioters. Trump urged demonstrators to seize state institutions and claimed that "help is on its way," before later shifting tone and calling on Tehran to return to negotiations and strike a nuclear deal.

Amid these developments, Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei warned earlier in the day that any war initiated by the US against Iran would inevitably expand into a regional conflict.

Separately, Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said on Saturday that progress had been made toward building a framework for talks between Tehran and Washington, despite rising rhetoric and the threat of military escalation, signalling tentative diplomatic movement even as tensions persist.

Meanwhile, the security situation remains fragile, with US Central Command continuing to deploy warships, fighter jets, and additional troops to West Asia under what it describes as "regional security" measures.

Iran has reiterated that any act of aggression would be met with a swift and forceful response.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
The Gulf states refusing to let the US use their bases is a big development. They don't want to be caught in the middle. Shows that regional powers are tired of being pawns in bigger games. Wise move.
A
Aman W
Iran has been preparing for this for decades. Those mountains are a natural fortress. The US should think ten times before any action. A regional war would be a disaster for everyone, including the millions of Indians working in the Gulf. 🇮🇳
S
Sarah B
Reading this from a strategic point of view, the missile arsenal imbalance is staggering. If the GCC's air defence can't handle a saturation attack, it puts all critical infrastructure at risk. This needs a diplomatic solution, not military posturing.
V
Vikram M
The article mentions progress on a talks framework. That's the only sane path forward. The US and Iran need to sit down. Constant threats and counter-threats help no one. India has good relations with both; maybe we can play a quiet role?
K
Karthik V
While the threat is serious, I have to respectfully point out that the US expanding its footprint is part of the problem. Their presence often escalates tensions. Sometimes the best way to de-escalate is to reduce, not increase, military assets in a volatile region.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50