Iran's Araghchi: Talks With US Envoy Are Not Negotiations

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed direct communications with US special envoy Steve Witkoff but stressed these do not constitute formal negotiations. He asserted Iran's territorial rights over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, stating it should be under Iranian and Omani authority after the war. Araghchi dismissed the likelihood of a US ground invasion, warning of fierce resistance and expressing confidence in Iran's defense capabilities. His comments come as regional powers attempt to facilitate dialogue while Tehran emphasizes its conditions for ending hostilities.

Key Points: Iran Denies Formal Talks with US Amid Ongoing Conflict

  • Direct US contact isn't negotiation
  • Iran claims post-war Strait of Hormuz authority
  • Dismisses prospect of US ground invasion
  • Zero trust in US due to past actions
2 min read

Iran Foreign Minister Araghchi says speaking to Steve Witkoff does not mean negotiations

Iran's FM Araghchi confirms contact with US envoy but says it's not negotiation, asserts control over Strait of Hormuz, and warns against US invasion.

"I receive messages from Witkoff directly... this does not mean that we are in negotiations. - Abbas Araghchi"

Tehran, April 1

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi offered a candid assessment of the ongoing war involving his country, the United States and Israel, stressing Tehran's stance on diplomacy, territorial rights over strategic waterways and readiness for potential military escalation in an interview with Al Jazeera.

Araghchi confirmed direct communications with the United States via Steve Witkoff, Washington's special envoy, amid continued conflict, Al Jazeera reported. However, he was emphatic that these exchanges do not amount to negotiations and dismissed claims from Washington and Western officials that formal talks were underway.

"I receive messages from Witkoff directly, as before, and this does not mean that we are in negotiations," Al Jazeera quoted Araghchi as saying, adding that there is "no truth to the claim of negotiations with any party in Iran" and that Iran has zero trust in the United States due to past experiences, including the US withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal.

Secondly, Araghchi addressed the status and future of the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the world's oil and gas flows in peacetime. He argued that the strait lies within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman and should be under their authority after the war.

During the conflict, he said, it is open to most nations but closed to ships of countries at war with Iran, insisting this restriction is lawful and typical for wartime maritime security, Al Jazeera reported.

His remarks highlighted Iran's intent to play a central role in post-war governance of the waterway, even as Gulf states like Qatar have demanded inclusion in discussions on its future.

On the third major takeaway, Araghchi dismissed the prospect of a US ground invasion, saying Iran is prepared to defend its territory and warning that any such assault would face fierce resistance.

"We are waiting for them," he said, adding, "I don't think they'd dare to do such a thing. There will be a lot of strength waiting for them."

He stressed Iran's confidence in its defence capabilities, particularly in a hypothetical land war, and expressed hope that Washington would avoid making that "mistake."

Araghchi's remarks come as the conflict wears on, with efforts by regional powers like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt to facilitate dialogue, even as Tehran continues to emphasise its conditions for a comprehensive end to hostilities rather than a simple ceasefire.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Iran saying "we are waiting for them" shows how confident they are. But this constant tension is not good for the region. We need peace and dialogue, not more threats. India has good relations with both Iran and the US, maybe we can help mediate?
A
Aman W
Honestly, I don't blame Iran for having zero trust in the US. After they walked out of the nuclear deal, why would anyone believe their promises? It's a lesson for all countries dealing with America.
S
Sarah B
The minister makes a fair point about wartime maritime rules. But claiming sole authority over the Strait after the conflict is a bit much. It needs a multilateral framework. Hope Pakistan, Saudi, and Turkey's efforts for dialogue bear fruit soon.
V
Vikram M
This is all posturing. "Talking is not negotiating" – what does that even mean? They are clearly communicating. Both sides need to drop the ego and talk properly. Every day of war hurts ordinary people the most.
K
Karthik V
As an Indian, my primary concern is energy security. Any disruption in the Strait of Hormuz directly impacts us. I appreciate Iran's stance on defending its territory, but I hope cooler heads prevail for the sake of global trade and stability.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50