Iran Agrees to Conditional US Talks Amid Military Threats and Nuclear Tensions

Iran has conditionally agreed to hold talks with the United States in an effort to de-escalate military threats, with Oman expected to host the discussions. President Masoud Pezeshkian has instructed his foreign minister to engage, but only in an environment free from threats and "unreasonable expectations." A key dispute is the agenda, as Iran wants to focus solely on its nuclear program while the US seeks to include Iran's ballistic missiles and support for regional proxies. The diplomatic push occurs amid a backdrop of US military drills, Iranian warnings of forceful retaliation, and calls from Israel for the US to maintain a skeptical and stringent stance.

Key Points: Iran Conditionally Agrees to US Talks to Avert Strike Threat

  • Talks mediated by Oman
  • US demands include missiles and proxies
  • Iran insists on nuclear-only agenda
  • Sanctions relief is crucial for Iran
  • Israel urges US skepticism
3 min read

Iran conditionally agrees for talks with US amid threats of strike

Iran agrees to talks with the US, mediated by Oman, amid military threats and disputes over nuclear program and regional influence.

"I have instructed my Minister of Foreign Affairs, provided that a suitable environment exists -- one free from threats and unreasonable expectations -- to pursue fair and equitable negotiations - Masoud Pezeshkian"

Tehran, February 6

Iran has conditionally agreed to hold talks with the US to avert the threat of further military strikes, CNN reported.

The push for renewed diplomacy comes after weeks of escalatory rhetoric between Washington and Tehran. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly warned that unless Iran agrees to a deal on its nuclear program, "bad things" could happen, a message that has been amplified by the movement of a US carrier strike group and other military assets into the Middle East.

According to CNN, the discussions are expected to be held in Oman. Iran's ISNA news agency also reported Oman as the venue for talks on Friday.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, under pressure from regional powers and amid internal unrest, has formally instructed Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to engage in negotiations with the United States "provided that a suitable environment exists ... free from threats and unreasonable expectations."

"I have instructed my Minister of Foreign Affairs, provided that a suitable environment exists -- one free from threats and unreasonable expectations -- to pursue fair and equitable negotiations, guided by the principles of dignity, prudence, and expediency," Pezeshkian wrote on X.

One of the central disputes remains the scope of negotiations. Tehran insists discussions address only its nuclear activities, while the US seeks to expand the agenda to include Iran's ballistic missile capabilities and its support for proxy forces in the region. Iran has repeatedly described limitations on its defense capabilities as a red line, complicating negotiations, reported CNN.

Underlying the diplomatic maneuvering is a stark reality: after Iran's bloody crackdown on anti-government protests and subsequent Western condemnation, the US has maintained a tough posture that includes multi-day military drills in the Middle East and explicit threats of force if Tehran does not compromise on key issues.

Iranian officials, for their part, caution that any military action would be met with force and risks spiraling into a broader conflict. Tehran also emphasizes that sanctions relief remains crucial to its participation in negotiations, while its leadership has warned that US strikes could spark widespread regional instability.

Israeli leaders have also weighed in, urging US negotiators to remain sceptical of Iranian intentions and demanding stringent conditions for any agreement, adding another layer of complexity to the already fraught diplomatic efforts.

The talks are set against a long and turbulent history of nuclear diplomacy, including past agreements and breakdowns such as the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, from which the US withdrew in 2018. Iran's enrichment of uranium to high purity levels has raised international alarms, and disagreements over how, or whether, to reverse such progress remain central to current negotiations.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
The condition "free from threats" is key. How can you have a fair negotiation with a gun to your head? The US military drills are pure intimidation. Iran has every right to defend itself. The world needs to move away from this bully mentality.
A
Aman W
From an Indian perspective, less tension is better for global oil prices. But let's be honest, Iran's support for proxies is a real problem for regional peace. The US wanting to include that in talks makes sense. Hope Oman can broker something meaningful.
S
Sarah B
Respectfully, I think the article underplays Iran's internal crackdown. While diplomacy is crucial, negotiations shouldn't legitimize a government that suppresses its own people so violently. The West's condemnation was justified.
K
Karthik V
Oman is a good neutral ground. Gulf countries are trying to reduce tensions, which is positive for India's "Middle East Corridor" plans. But Israel's scepticism adds a big hurdle. The shadow of the failed JCPOA looms large. Fingers crossed for peace.
V
Varun X
Trump's "bad things" rhetoric is so unhelpful. You don't de-escalate by threatening more. Sanctions relief is the only way forward. Iran's people are suffering, and that helps no one. Hope sense prevails on both sides. The region can't afford another war.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50