Sat, 5 Sep 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 1, 2026 · 01:05
Cricket News Updated Jun 1, 2026

GT Captain Gill Admits 180-190 Could Have Changed IPL 2026 Final

Gujarat Titans captain Shubman Gill admitted his side fell short of a competitive total in the IPL 2026 final, losing to Royal Challengers Bengaluru by five wickets. Gill stated that a score of 180-190 would have made it a good match, but GT managed only 155. Virat Kohli's unbeaten 75 powered RCB's successful title defense, making them the third team to defend an IPL crown. Despite the loss, GT received Rs 12.5 crore as runners-up, and Mohammed Siraj and Sai Sudharsan won individual season awards.

IPL 2026: If we'd have gotten 180‑190, it'd have been a good match, says GT skipper Gill

Ahmedabad, June 1

Gujarat Titans captain Shubman Gill admitted his side fell short of making a big score in the IPL 2026 final, conceding that a bigger total could have changed the complexion of the contest, where they lost by five wickets at the Narendra Modi Stadium.

Gill's reflection came after Royal Challengers Bengaluru defended their crown in front of a packed crowd, powered by Virat Kohli's unbeaten 75 - his fastest IPL fifty coming off 25 balls. Kohli's knock helped RCB chase down 156 with two overs to spare, and ensured the side joined Mumbai Indians and Chennai Super Kings as the only teams to defend their IPL title successfully.

"If we'd have gotten 180-190, it'd have been a good match. Maybe a little two-paced but not too much. There's some early movement for pacers. We lost early wickets and never got momentum. We felt we'll be in the game if we took 1-2 wickets in the powerplay," said Gill at the conclusion of the game.

RCB's seamers had earlier set the tone for the win on a mixed soil pitch, with Josh Hazlewood and Bhuvneshwar Kumar striking early and Rasikh Salam Dar returning with figures of 3-27. Washington Sundar's fighting fifty lifted GT to 155, but the total proved to be insufficient against Kohli's brilliance.

"We gave 15-20 too many, and they got away in the powerplay. We were one of the best bowling sides. We came back strong after losing the first two games. Kept challenging and improving ourselves. Very happy overall. Couldn't get over the line. Still would've had things to improve on even if we'd won the trophy," added Gill.

Despite losing the final, GT got a cheque of Rs 12.5 crore for being IPL 2026 runners-up. The side also saw pacer Mohammed Siraj win the award for most dot balls in the season (172), while left-handed opener Sai Sudharsan claimed the prize for most fours hit in the competition (75).

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

Honestly, I think GT missed Hardik Pandya's all-round ability. Washington Sundar tried his best, but the middle order collapsed. Kohli's fifty was brilliant, but RCB's bowling was just too clinical. Next season, GT needs a stronger batting lineup. Respect for the team!

Vikram M

Great analysis by Gill. The pitch was two-paced, and losing early wickets cost us. But credit to RCB for defending their title - they played smart cricket. Sai Sudharsan getting most fours in the season is a silver lining. Well done GT for reaching the final! 👏

Rohit P

I think GT's bowling was their strength all season, but today they lacked a bit of discipline. Gill's right about 180-190 - that would've made it a contest. But Kohli is just unstoppable in big matches. Siraj deserved the dot ball award - he bowled his heart out. Happy for RCB though!

Kavya N

Gill was honest in his criticism - GT could have done better. The early wickets in the powerplay really set them back. But I think they should have used Rashid Khan more in the middle overs. Still, 12.5 crore is not bad for being runners-up! Next year, we'll come back stronger. 💪

James A

As a neutral fan, this was a one-sided final. RCB's bowling attack was just too disciplined for GT. Kohli's fifty was clinical, but Hazlewood and Bhuvi set it up. GT needs to rethink their batting strategy for the powerplay.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked