Thu, 25 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 25, 2026 · 06:55
World News Updated Jun 25, 2026

IAEA Confirms Inspections of Iran's Nuclear Sites Will Proceed

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi stated that inspections of Iran's uranium enrichment sites will occur, citing a Memorandum of Understanding signed by the US and Iran. This contradicts Iran's claims, as Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi denied any program for access to nuclear facilities. Grossi emphasized that the inspections are inevitable, though the exact timing is not critical. The framework deal, signed separately by US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, initiates a 60-day window to finalize a peace agreement.

Inspections of Iran's nuclear sites 'going to happen', says IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi

Fukushima, June 25

International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said that IAEA inspectors will gain access to Iran's uranium enrichment sites, EuroNews reported, contradicting Iran's claims.

Speaking to reporters at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant on Wednesday, Grossi said that the MoU signed by the US and Iran leaves no room for ambiguity.

"I can understand political statements, they are part of the reality, but the fundamental thing I would like to remind you and draw your attention to is that there has been a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by both presidents," Grossi said, as quoted by EuroNews.

The framework deal, he said, "says explicitly that the nuclear activities that are going to be carried out with regard to the nuclear material facilities will be supervised by the IAEA -- in all letters."

"Obviously, to do that, we will have to inspect. Whether this happens the day after tomorrow or in one week or in 10 days, it's important, but not essential. This is going to happen," he added, as quoted by EuroNews.

The comments come as Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs of Iran, Kazem Gharibabadi said that there is no program for access to the attacked facilities and nuclear materials.

In a post on X, he said, "In Switzerland, no meeting was held with Grossi, despite his request. There is also no program for access to the attacked facilities and nuclear materials. These issues will solely be examined and resolved within the framework of the final agreement and as a result of the other party's practical action in terminating all sanctions and you cannot advance the "stir up and take over" policy with media hype."

US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed the framework deal separately last week, starting a 60-day window to reach a final peace deal.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Sarah B

The IAEA is the only neutral body that can verify compliance. Iran’s Foreign Ministry claiming there’s “no program for access” sounds like a diplomatic smokescreen. Grossi is right – the MoU is clear. Let’s hope the US doesn’t cave to Iranian theatrics. The world is watching.

Siddharth J

Another round of cat-and-mouse with Iran. But honestly, why should we trust any deal when Iran keeps shifting goalposts? India has always supported peaceful nuclear energy but this back-and-forth is exhausting. Cross-verification by IAEA is non-negotiable. Stop the drama.

James A

Grossi is doing his job correctly – inspections must happen per the signed MoU. Iran’s deputy foreign minister is clearly trying to undermine the deal. But the IAEA isn’t bluffing; they’ve dealt with Iran’s tactics before. Let’s see if Tehran walks back its denial in the coming days. 🧐

Divya L

It's shocking that Iran signed a deal then immediately contradicts the core clause. Grossi's statement shows the IAEA isn't backing down. For India, which has always stood for non-proliferation and transparent nuclear governance, this is a test of international law. Iran must comply or face consequences.

Rohit L

This whole saga is tiring. Grossi says inspections will happen, Iran says no. Meanwhile, Trump signed a framework – but from India, we know how quickly US policy can flip. The IAEA needs to act decisively, not just give statements. Otherwise, the whole non-proliferation system looks weak.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked