BJP Defends Vande Mataram as Inseparable Part of Indian Heritage Amid Opposition Criticism

The BJP has strongly rebutted Opposition claims that putting Vande Mataram on par with the national anthem is exclusionary or unconstitutional. BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya argued that Vande Mataram is an inseparable part of India's civilisational heritage. The controversy erupted after the Union Cabinet approved amendments to the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, giving the national song similar statutory protection. Malviya rejected arguments that the song is merely an ode to a Goddess, stating that personification of the motherland is a global cultural practice.

Key Points: BJP Rebuts Opposition on Vande Mataram Status

  • BJP rebuts Opposition charge of Vande Mataram being exclusionary
  • Union Cabinet amends law to give national song equal protection as anthem
  • Amit Malviya says song is inseparable part of Indian heritage
  • Opposition leaders like Asaduddin Owaisi raise objections
3 min read

Inseparable part of Indian heritage: BJP rebuts Oppn's charge of Vande Mataram being 'exclusionary'

BJP's Amit Malviya refutes Opposition claims that Vande Mataram is exclusionary, calling it an inseparable part of India's civilisational heritage.

"India is not a theocratic state, nor does nationalism here depend on adherence to any one faith. - Amit Malviya"

New Delhi, May 8

Amid the concerns and objections raised by the Opposition over putting Vande Mataram on the same footing with Jana Gana Mana, the Bharatiya Janata Party on Friday refuted the volley of charges as "untenable and unjustifiable".

It said that attempts to portray Vande Mataram as "exclusionary or unconstitutional" were an intellectually dishonest and historically selective move.

BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya took to X to issue a detailed rebuttal to the opposition's claims that it would alienate the masses and promote discord in society.

He said that India's rich civilisational heritage belongs equally to all citizens and Vande Mataram is an inseparable part of that heritage.

The controversy over Vande Mataram emanated after the Union Cabinet, on Thursday night, approved a proposal to amend the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, which entails similar statutory protection to the national song (at par with the national anthem) and any obstruction to the singing of Vande Mataram would be treated as a punishable offence.

The Union Cabinet's decision on Vande Mataram evoked strong reactions from the Opposition leaders, including AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, who claimed that it was actually "an ode to the Goddess and hence cannot be treated at par with the national anthem".

Malviya, rejecting the charge, said that the argument that Vande Mataram is merely an ode to a Goddess deliberately ignores the civilisational context of Bharat.

"Across Indian traditions, the motherland has long been personified as Bharat Mata", not as a sectarian deity, but as a cultural and emotional expression of devotion to the nation. Nations across the world employ symbolism, allegory, and personification. Britannia represents Britain, Marianne represents France, Mother Russia represents Russia. India's cultural symbolism cannot be selectively delegitimised simply because it emerges from Indic civilisation," he said.

He further said that the song had become the rallying cry of India's anti-colonial movement, countless freedom fighters marched to the gallows chanting Vande Mataram, and therefore, its emotional power in the national movement cannot be erased by retrospective ideological filters.

Further brushing aside Owaisi's argument, he remarked, "India is not a theocratic state, nor does nationalism here depend on adherence to any one faith. But India is undeniably a civilisation shaped by millennia of Indic thought, traditions, symbols, and philosophies. Respecting Vande Mataram does not make India less constitutional, less democratic, or less inclusive."

The BJP leader, also the party's co-in-charge of Bengal, recalled that the Constituent Assembly had adopted Jana Gana Mana as the National Anthem on January 24, 1950 and also accorded Vande Mataram, an equal respect and status as the National Song because of its historic role in India's freedom struggle.

"To suggest that India's constitutional founders 'rejected' Vande Mataram is factually incorrect," he stated, showing the Opposition the mirror.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone from a different cultural background, I find it interesting how strongly Indians feel about their national symbols. From an outsider's perspective, it seems like a genuine expression of patriotism rather than exclusion. But I'm curious to hear more diverse Indian voices on this.
P
Priya S
Respectfully, I think we need to be more careful here. Vande Mataram has deep emotional significance, yes, but forcing legal consequences for not singing it might create unnecessary tension. 🙏 India's strength is in its diversity - we can honor the song without making it compulsory. Just my two paise.
R
Rajesh Q
Exactly! Our Constitution already gives Vande Mataram equal status as National Song. The opposition is creating unnecessary controversy. Every Indian should feel proud to sing it - it's not about worshipping a goddess, it's about respecting our motherland. Bharat Mata ki Jai! 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
The comparison with Britannia, Marianne, and Mother Russia is quite apt. Every nation personifies its identity. I think the opposition is missing the bigger picture here - this is about honoring India's civilizational heritage, not about imposing any particular religious view.
N
Nisha Z
I am a Muslim woman and I have no problem with Vande Mataram. It's a beautiful song that inspired our freedom fighters. But I do worry that this amendment might be used to target minorities unnecessarily. The intention might be good, but implementation needs careful thought. 🤔

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50