NewKerala.com

Pakistan's Tax Reforms Prioritize Optics Over Structural Change: Report

A new report argues that Pakistan's Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) introduces procedural innovations more for optics than for delivering meaningful results. It states that automation and new mechanisms, like a withholding tax on digital goods, cannot compensate for deep institutional fragility and lost credibility. The burden of compliance increasingly falls on formal sector intermediaries, while large parts of the economy remain outside the tax net. This reflects a long-standing preference for administrative convenience over the structural reforms needed to widen the tax base and improve governance.

Key Points: Pakistan's Tax Reforms: Administrative Convenience Over Results

  • FBR's new tax mechanism sensible on paper
  • Reforms burden compliant formal economy
  • Vast economic segments remain untaxed
  • Automation cannot fix institutional fragility
2 min read

Innovation in Pakistan a display of administrative convenience over structural reforms: Report

A report criticizes Pakistan's FBR for prioritizing procedural innovations over structural reforms to fix its chronic revenue collection issues.

"whether any new procedural innovation can succeed when the institution introducing it has steadily lost credibility on its core mandate - Business Recorder report"

New Delhi, Feb 21

When it comes to innovation in Pakistan, every new system, manual, or reform announcement struggles to escape the perception that it is designed as much to manage optics as to deliver results, according to a new report.

Business Recorder writes that the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR's) latest attempt to tighten tax collection through a withholding mechanism on digitally ordered goods appears "sensible on paper".

However, this initiative inevitably revives an older and far more fundamental question - "whether any new procedural innovation can succeed when the institution introducing it has steadily lost credibility on its core mandate".

"Revenue performance has increasingly been framed in defensive terms, with targets routinely missed and 'success' recast as falling short by a narrower margin than the previous year," said the report.

"An organisation tasked with expanding the tax base and lifting revenues has, instead, normalised underperformance," it added.

The report argues that automation cannot compensate for institutional fragility, nor can intermediaries be expected to resolve failures rooted in governance and enforcement.

Each successive reform places greater responsibility on compliant actors operating within the formal economy.

The article states that payment firms, courier services and online platforms are asked to absorb new reporting obligations, shoulder compliance risks and act, in effect, as extensions of the tax authority.

"Meanwhile, vast segments of economic activity remain either lightly taxed or entirely untouched," it laments.

It further adds that the burden deepens where compliance already exists, while the broader tax net remains stubbornly narrow.

This reflects a long-standing preference for administrative convenience over structural reforms.

"When taxpayers encounter complexity without corresponding improvement in outcomes, trust erodes. When rules change frequently, but revenue does not rise meaningfully, scepticism hardens. Over time, credibility becomes the rarest currency of all," the article says.

Moreover, the article add that Pakistan's revenue challenge is neither mysterious nor novel.

"It stems from a narrow base, weak documentation, political interference and inconsistent application of the law," it says.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
"Credibility becomes the rarest currency of all." What a powerful line. It's a universal truth for any tax authority. If citizens don't trust that the system is fair and that their money is used well, compliance will always be a struggle. This seems like putting a band-aid on a deep wound.
V
Vikram M
The part about burdening compliant actors in the formal economy is so true. It's always easier to squeeze the salaried class and registered businesses than to go after the untaxed, informal sector. We see echoes of this everywhere. Real reform means political courage to tax the powerful, not just the visible.
P
Priya S
As someone who works in e-commerce logistics, this is a familiar story. Governments want to use platforms as tax collectors because it's administratively convenient. But it increases costs and complexity for us without necessarily fixing the root problem. The "vast segments" untouched remain a leaky bucket. 🤔
R
Rohit P
It's a bit rich for an Indian paper to critique another country's administrative failures so bluntly. We have our own massive problems with tax bureaucracy and harassment of small businesses. Maybe we should focus on fixing our house first? Just saying.
K
Kavya N
The cycle is sad but predictable: announce a new "tech-driven" solution, create more work for those already following rules, miss targets, and then declare a narrower miss as success. It's about managing headlines, not the economy. Until there's accountability for performance, nothing will change.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50