India's Export Growth Hinges on Quality Manufacturing, Global Competitiveness

NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Suman Bery stated that India's ambitions to expand its global trade footprint depend squarely on improving the quality and competitiveness of its domestic manufacturing. He highlighted that entering global markets requires deep integration into global value chains, especially in high-technology sectors like electronics. Bery outlined that manufacturing is crucial for addressing economic vulnerability and employment, particularly for absorbing India's youthful workforce and increasing female labour participation. He concluded that reforms must be strategic and aligned with global markets, warning against complacency due to the large domestic market.

Key Points: India's Export Ambitions Need Quality Manufacturing: NITI Aayog

  • Quality production key for exports
  • Manufacturing central for jobs & productivity
  • Need to integrate into global value chains
  • Must boost female workforce participation
  • Policy must balance self-reliance with global efficiency
3 min read

India's export ambitions hinge on quality manufacturing, global competitiveness: NITI Aayog VC

NITI Aayog VC Suman Bery says India's global trade success depends on improving manufacturing quality and integrating into global value chains.

"We can only be successful at exports if we are successful at quality production. - Suman Bery"

New Delhi, February 13

India's ambitions to expand its footprint in global trade will depend squarely on improving the quality and competitiveness of its domestic manufacturing base, NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Suman Bery said on Thursday.

"We can only be successful at exports if we are successful at quality production," Bery said, speaking at the release of the latest edition of the government's quarterly Trade Watch publication, which this time focused on electronics exports.

Bery said international trade was "fundamental to the transformation of the Indian economy," and commended the team behind the report, including NITI Aayog Member R.S. Sahoo and Chief Executive Officer B.V.R. Subrahmanyam, for sustaining the quarterly analytical effort. He expressed hope that the publication would receive wider attention for informing policy debate and stakeholder engagement.

India's push to strengthen manufacturing is not new, Bery said, tracing the policy objective back to the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956. However, he noted that while India has maintained its share of global manufacturing value added at roughly 13%, it has not significantly increased it over time.

He drew a distinction between manufacturing and the broader industrial sector, which also includes mining and construction, saying the current policy focus is squarely on manufacturing. Recent policy discussions, including references in the Economic Survey and the Union Budget, have underscored plans for a National Manufacturing Mission to boost competitiveness.

Bery outlined two principal reasons for prioritising manufacturing.

"The first is economic vulnerability. If we are highly dependent on manufacturing inputs in a world of weaponised trade, this creates a vulnerability. The policymakers and investors must carefully balance strategic self-reliance with the efficiencies of global specialisation. He described this as a make versus buy decision that requires intelligent policy," he said.

"The second reason is employment. Evidence from countries such as China and Vietnam suggests that the share of manufacturing in total employment has peaked at lower income levels over time, complicating the traditional pathway from agrarian to industrial economies. For India, which faces a large and youthful demographic profile, manufacturing remains central to raising labour productivity and absorbing workers into more productive sectors," he added.

He also highlighted gender inclusion as a critical dimension. Citing India's relatively low female labour force participation rate, Bery said expanding opportunities for women in factory employment could significantly lift overall growth.

"One way of thinking about moving from 6%-6.5% growth to 8% growth is to bring many more women into the workforce and equip them for higher levels of labour productivity," he said, pointing to examples from states such as Tamil Nadu.

Turning to exports, Bery said entering global markets today requires deep integration into global value chains (GVCs), particularly in high-technology sectors such as electronics. He noted that NITI Aayog has conducted an analysis on how India can better position itself within electronics GVCs.

He echoed comments by NITI Aayog Member Arvind Virmani that India should not be complacent about its relatively modest share in global trade. While India is the world's fourth-largest manufacturing economy by value added, its ranking as a merchandise exporter is significantly lower, underscoring the need to translate production capacity into export competitiveness.

Bery concluded that reforms must be "prudent" and strategically aligned with global markets. "We should not allow our large domestic market to distract us from the need to be globally competitive," he said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
The point about female labour force participation is crucial. In many states, cultural barriers and safety concerns keep women out of factories. If we can create more women-friendly industrial clusters with hostels and transport, it could be a game-changer for growth and social empowerment. 👏
R
Rahul R
Good analysis, but I respectfully disagree on one point. The focus shouldn't just be on competing in existing global value chains where we're always a step behind. We should also invest heavily in R&D to create our own value chains in emerging sectors like green tech and semiconductors. Jai Hind!
S
Sarah B
Interesting read from an Indian policy perspective. The "make vs buy" dilemma is real for many nations post-pandemic. India's demographic dividend is its biggest asset, but only if skilling keeps pace with manufacturing ambitions.
A
Aman W
Quality starts at the MSME level. Most of our small manufacturers lack access to modern technology and quality certification. Government schemes need to reach the ground faster. PLI is good for large players, but what about the lakhs of small workshops?
K
Kavya N
True! We need a mindset shift from jugaad to perfection. Look at German or Japanese manufacturing. Their reputation for quality wasn't built overnight. It requires discipline, continuous training, and pride in workmanship. Our educational system needs to promote vocational training from a young age.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50