Terrorism Hinders SAARC Progress, Says Former Diplomat Veena Sikri

Former diplomat Veena Sikri asserts India's position on SAARC is based on the principled issue of terrorism, not merely against Pakistan. She emphasizes that resolving terrorism must be paired with broader regional cooperation in areas like technology and climate change. Sikri notes India's potential to offer more while maintaining core positions, and calls for a pragmatic approach to regional diplomacy. She also highlights the need for external pressure to shift Pakistan's stance on terrorism for progress.

Key Points: Terrorism Hinders SAARC: Veena Sikri

  • India's SAARC stance is on principled terrorism issue, not just Pakistan
  • Resolving terrorism needed alongside broader regional engagement
  • India can expand cooperation in tech, markets, climate change
  • Pakistan's use of terrorism as instrument must be addressed for talks
4 min read

India is not holding up SAARC just for sake of Pakistan, but on principled issue of terrorism: Former diplomat Veena Sikri

Former diplomat Veena Sikri says India's SAARC stance is based on terrorism, not just Pakistan. She calls for regional cooperation beyond rivalry.

"We are not holding up SAARC just for its sake about Pakistan. No, we are holding up SAARC on the principled issue of terrorism. - Veena Sikri"

New Delhi, May 10

Former Indian diplomat Veena Sikri on Sunday said that India is not holding up the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation for the sake of Pakistan, but on the "principled issue of terrorism," stressing that the regional grouping cannot move forward unless the issue is addressed in a clear and structured manner.

In an interview with ANI on the broader challenges facing regional cooperation in South Asia, Sikri said, "It is not just the terrorists. If the money is the weaponry, let's get all those lines clear as to who is doing what and then we'll be able to get the narrative clear on that and say that we are not holding up SAARC just for its sake about Pakistan. No, we are holding up SAARC on the principled issue of terrorism and we would like this issue to be solved. Give that importance."

She emphasised that resolving the issue of terrorism needed to be supplemented by broader regional engagement. "This needs to be supplemented by other efforts also. Such as today, there is a change in Bangladesh, in Nepal, etc. And the new generation is looking for mundane things. Technology cooperation, scholarships, markets, you know, people-to-people contact, issues of climate change, etc. Where India has huge, huge potential and our capabilities," she said.

Sikri further noted that India could expand cooperation in multiple domains while maintaining its core position. "Today, you know, we can mitigate these issues of SAARC and the Indus Water Treaty, et cetera, by first sticking to our positions, very, very important, as she said, but also offering something much more than they had earlier. And this will bring it together," she added.

Commenting on the future of the regional bloc, she was candid about its past performance. "So I think SAARC was one thing which was invented in the 1980s and it hasn't worked. It hasn't worked, it hasn't worked," Sikri said, while suggesting a recalibration of regional priorities.

She also pointed to India-Bangladesh relations under previous leaderships, stating, "Let me give you one example of how SAARC. Let's take just within SAARC, India and Bangladesh. Now, under the 15 years when Sheikh Hasina was Prime Minister, all she did was she said, I will respect India's security red lines."

Calling for a pragmatic approach to regional diplomacy, she said India should not be trapped in adversarial narratives. "Let's talk about SAARC. Let's be realistic and say that this India-Pakistan rivalry that is going on in SAARC, put that aside. Put your domestic fight with Pakistan aside. Give Pakistan the respect, which is that now the rest of the world sees Pakistan as an important power," she said.

At the same time, Sikri underlined that India's engagement with the world remains active and multidirectional. "All the players, President Trump, and the Prime Minister had a 40-minute discussion. The second time it was. He's spoken to Masood Peshishkian of Iran. He's spoken to Saudi Arabia, spoken to the UAE. So we have kept our doors open with everybody and they know that we are ready at any time," she said.

Reiterating India's position on terrorism, she added, "Whatever has happened with Pakistan, it does not take away their use of terrorism as an instrument of a straight path. So, I think that there can be no talks with terrorism. If they're willing to abrogate their stand on terrorism, fine. I think that'll be a great progress."

She further said external mediation or pressure could help shift Pakistan's stance. "If America can get them, force them into that or somebody can, that's fine. Then we really can get it going," Sikri noted.

However, she also acknowledged the pattern of instability affecting regional dialogue. "But we know that every time you have a SAARC meeting, before or after, there'll be a terrorist deal," she said.

Established in 1985, SAARC comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Its secretariat is based in Kathmandu, Nepal, and it aims to promote economic cooperation, regional integration and development across South Asia.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I appreciate the nuanced take. She's not just blaming Pakistan but also saying India should offer more—like tech cooperation, scholarships, climate change initiatives. That's smart diplomacy. We can't just sit and wait for Pakistan to change; we need to engage with Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives on other fronts. SAARC might be stuck, but we can still build bilateral wins. 🇮🇳
J
James A
As an American following South Asian affairs, this is such a revealing interview. The point about "every SAARC meeting has a terrorist event before or after" is chilling. India's position seems principled, but I wonder if there's a middle ground? Or is terrorism truly non-negotiable? Looking at it from outside, the region is losing out on so much potential cooperation.
R
Rohit P
"SAARC hasn't worked, hasn't worked, hasn't worked." Straight talk, but is she right? We've spent billions on infrastructure and trade within SAARC framework, and what have we gotten? A few summits and photo ops. Meanwhile, China is building roads and ports across our neighbors. Maybe it's time to admit SAARC is a failed experiment and focus on BIMSTEC or bilateral deals instead.
K
Kavya N
I agree with her call to "put aside the domestic fight with Pakistan." Yes, terrorism is a red line, but Indian diplomacy has become too reactive. We're always waiting for Pakistan to make the first move. Why can't we lead with positive engagement—like the India-Bangladesh model she mentioned? Sheikh Hasina showed what respect for India's security looks like. We need more of that energy.
S
Sarah B

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50