India Needs $750M to Create 100 Non-Profit Unicorns, Report Reveals

India requires $750 million in flexible funding over five years to develop 100 non-profit unicorns capable of reaching a million people each. The report finds that 80% of organizations struggle to scale due to a lack of unrestricted capital, with 55% identifying regulation as the main barrier to raising such funds. Most domestic funding is skewed toward large organizations, leaving early-stage non-profits with small, one-time grants. The report calls for funders to provide patient, risk-tolerant capital to non-profits, similar to startup investing, to drive innovation and population-scale impact.

Key Points: $750M Funding Gap for India's Non-Profit Unicorns

  • $750M needed over 5 years
  • 80% struggle due to inflexible capital
  • 55% cite regulation as primary constraint
  • 75% would invest in talent with flexible funds
3 min read

India needs USD 750 million in flexible funding to create 100 non-profit unicorns: Change Engine Report

A new report states India needs $750 million in flexible funding to build 100 high-impact non-profits, citing rigid grants as a major barrier to scale.

"Funders must fund non-profits like startups - Varun Aggarwal, Co-founder, Change Engine"

New Delhi, February 26

India will need USD 750 million in flexible funding over the next five years to build 100 non-profit unicorns, according to the Change Engine's report, The Flexible Funding Gap for Non-Profit Unicorns.

This equates to USD 150 million a year, just one per cent of India's philanthropic giving.

Non-profit unicorns are organisations capable of reaching one million people or 5 per cent of their target user base.

The report finds that nearly 80 per cent of the surveyed organisations struggle to scale due to the lack of flexible capital (non-programmatic capital that organisations can use to build teams, invest in systems, experiment with new models, and plan for the long term).

The report also stated that "55 pe cent cite regulation as the primary constraint for raising unrestricted (i.e. not tied to a program) funds, followed by a poor understanding of non-profit cost structures and benchmarks amongst funders."

Furthermore, 55 per cent of organisations raised flexible funding from High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs) and only 33 per cent from domestic foundations. Also, domestic foundation funding is skewed in favour of large organisations (with budgets more than Rs 5 crore), leaving very few sources of capital for early-stage organisations.

The report further revealed that 60 per cent of organisations reported that typical cheque sizes are less than Rs 10 lakhs, and most of these grants are one-time. Only 4 in 10 domestically funded organisations have ever received a multi-year grant. Just 2 in 10 surveyed organisations secured more than Rs 50 lakh in multi-year support.

If teams had more flexible funding, 75 per cent would invest in hiring talent, 32 per cent in bolder experiments, and 27 per cent in technology and data, the survey highlights.

Varun Aggarwal, Co-founder, Change Engine, said, "Beyond doing good to society, non-profits are also economic enablers. Funders must fund non-profits like startups, providing flexible funding to nurture innovative solutions to have a population-size impact on the deepest problems of India. Unrestricted capital gives non-profits the freedom to experiment, adapt, and innovate, enabling solutions rooted in the realities and evolving needs of the communities they serve."

Shubham Bansal, Co-founder of Change Engine, added, "India has produced more than 100 startup unicorns through patient, risk-tolerant capital. If India is to meet its social development goals (SDGs), it needs a comparable number of non-profit unicorns to drive impact at India's scale. Lack of flexible funding is one of the biggest bottlenecks for non-profits to scale. The capital exists; what's needed now is the willingness of funders to deploy it differently and support of policymakers to ease regulatory constraints."

This funding rigidity forces organisations to spend disproportionate time on fundraising, rather than focusing on innovation and impact. The issue is not the absence of capital but how it is designed and deployed. Respondents indicated that with greater flexibility, they would invest in strengthening core teams, prioritising innovation, pilots, and evidence generation.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
Finally, someone is talking about flexible funding! As someone who has worked with an early-stage NGO, 90% of our time was spent writing reports for donors instead of actually helping people. The ₹10 lakh grant ceiling is a real problem. 🫤
S
Sarah B
The comparison to startup unicorns is spot on. If investors can be patient with tech companies that may not profit for years, why can't philanthropists trust non-profits with flexible capital to solve our toughest social issues? The potential ROI for society is massive.
R
Rohit P
$750 million over 5 years sounds like a lot, but the report says it's just 1% of philanthropic giving. That puts it in perspective. If we can redirect a tiny fraction, the impact could be revolutionary. Policymakers need to ease those regulatory constraints mentioned.
K
Karthik V
While I agree with the need, I have a respectful criticism. The term "non-profit unicorn" feels a bit like jargon borrowed from the startup world. The focus should remain on sustainable impact and transparency, not just hitting a million-user metric. Let's not lose the soul of social work in pursuit of scale.
M
Meera T
The stat about 75% investing in talent hits home. Good people leave the non-profit sector because of unstable funding and low pay. Flexible, multi-year grants would allow orgs to hire and retain experts who truly understand grassroots problems. This is a nation-building issue.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50