India-EU Trade Deal Must Tackle Carbon Tax Impact, Says Jairam Ramesh

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has called for the impending India-EU Free Trade Agreement to address the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, which he labels an "unacceptable non-tariff barrier." The CBAM imposes a carbon cost on imported goods like steel and aluminium, with Indian exports to the EU already falling from $7 billion to $5.8 billion. A think tank report warns Indian exporters may have to slash prices by 15-22% so EU importers can pay the tax, placing a heavy burden on businesses. Ramesh asserts the FTA negotiations must formally account for this financial and compliance challenge to protect Indian trade interests.

Key Points: India-EU FTA Must Address EU Carbon Tax, Says Congress Leader

  • EU's CBAM is a carbon cost on imports
  • Indian steel/aluminium exports already falling
  • Exporters may need 15-22% price cuts
  • FTA must address this trade barrier
3 min read

India-EU FTA must address impact of carbon tax, suggests Jairam Ramesh

Jairam Ramesh urges India-EU FTA to counter CBAM, a carbon tax hitting steel & aluminium exports, which may force 15-22% price cuts for Indian firms.

"Any India-EU FTA that does get finally signed must account for this unacceptable non-tariff barrier. - Jairam Ramesh"

New Delhi, January 1

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Thursday suggested that the impending India-EU FTA, which is expected to be signed soon, must account for what he termed as "unacceptable non-tariff barrier", referring to the European Union's CBAM that is implemented fully from 2026.

Effective today, CBAM is a climate policy tool introduced by the European Union, designed to put a "fair price" on carbon emissions embedded in imported goods and prevent "carbon leakage."

The CBAM will have to be paid by Indian exporters on select goods, even as the central government is actively engaging with the EU for a comprehensive trade deal.

In 2024-25, India's exports of steel and aluminium (the items likely hardest hit by the CBAM) to the EU averaged USD 5.8 billion. It had fallen from USD 7 billion in the previous year, Jairam Ramesh wrote on X.

"In FY 2024-25, our exports of steel and aluminium to the EU averaged $5.8 billion - having already fallen from ~$7 billion in the previous year as EU importers began preparing for the introduction of the CBAM," the Congress leader's X post read.

He also cited the Indian trade-focused think tank, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), which estimates that many such Indian exporters may have to cut prices by 15-22 per cent so that their EU importers can use that margin to pay the carbon tax.

In addition, the Congress leader asserted that the CBAM documentation requirements call for meticulous accounting for and reporting of carbon emissions that are adding further costs to Indian exporters.

Against that backdrop, he suggested that, "Any India-EU FTA that does get finally signed must account for this unacceptable non-tariff barrier."

Indian steel and aluminium exporters are likely to face sharp pricing pressure in the European market from today, as every shipment entering the European Union will carry a carbon cost under the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), according to Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI).

The report said that from January 1, 2026, CBAM will move from a reporting phase to a payment-linked commercial reality. As a result, many Indian exporters may have to reduce export prices by 15 to 22 per cent so that EU importers can use this margin to pay the CBAM-related carbon cost.

While Indian exporters will not directly pay the tax, the burden will effectively fall on them. Under CBAM rules, EU-based importers, registered as authorised CBAM declarants, will be required to buy CBAM certificates linked to the embedded emissions in imported steel and aluminium.

However, this cost is expected to be pushed back to Indian suppliers through lower prices and tougher contract terms, GTRI noted.

The GTRI report warned that CBAM will hit Indian steel and aluminium exports to the EU hard, with MSMEs likely to bear the heaviest burden due to high compliance and verification costs.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While the concern for exporters is valid, we also need to look at this as a push towards greener manufacturing. India should accelerate its own carbon pricing and green energy transition to stay competitive globally. 🌱
V
Vikram M
This is classic protectionism wrapped in climate policy. EU industries have had decades to develop, now they're putting up walls. Our negotiators need to be very tough. A 15-22% price cut means razor-thin margins for our companies.
P
Priya S
The compliance costs will hurt small businesses the most. The government should provide direct support for MSMEs to upgrade technology and handle the documentation. Jairam ji is right to call it a non-tariff barrier.
R
Rohit P
Exports already fell from $7B to $5.8B? That's a worrying trend. We need to diversify our markets and not be so dependent on the EU. Atmanirbhar should also mean finding new export partners in Africa, Southeast Asia.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, while I agree with the concern, simply calling it "unacceptable" in the FTA talks isn't a strategy. We need a concrete counter-proposal, maybe linking it to technology transfer or green funds from the EU. The negotiation has to be smart.
M
Michael C
<

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50