Godrej Housing CEO Urges Rs 1 Crore Affordable Housing Definition

Mehernosh Tata, CEO of Godrej Housing Finance, advocates for a major revision in the definition of affordable housing, suggesting caps of Rs 1 crore for metros and Rs 75 lakh for non-metros. He emphasizes the need to cater to the mid-income salaried segment as urban migration increases. Tata proposes key budget measures, including raising the home loan interest deduction limit from Rs 2 lakh to Rs 5 lakh to provide significant monthly savings for buyers. He also recommends public-private partnerships and innovative financing to help with upfront costs like stamp duty.

Key Points: Godrej Housing CEO Calls for Rs 1 Crore Affordable Home Definition

  • Update affordable housing price cap
  • Increase home loan interest deduction
  • Foster public-private partnerships
  • Provide cheaper capital for developers
3 min read

"Increase affordable housing definition to Rs 1 crore," says Godrej Housing Finance CEO Mehernosh Tata

Godrej Housing Finance CEO Mehernosh Tata proposes raising the affordable housing price cap to Rs 1 crore in metros and Rs 75 lakh elsewhere to boost supply.

"the definition should be closer towards one crore so that it encourages the real estate developers to build these homes for the common man - Mehernosh Tata"

New Delhi, January 22

The Indian housing finance sector is witnessing a significant shift toward premium developments, but for the industry to remain sustainable and inclusive, a renewed focus on affordable housing is essential.

Mehernosh Tata, CEO of Godrej Housing Finance, highlighted in a recent ANI interview that while the real estate market in top cities is currently favoring luxury homes priced above Rs 1 crore, there is an urgent need to cater to the mid-income segment.

He emphasised that the definition of "affordable housing" requires an immediate update to reflect current market realities, suggesting that "the definition should be closer towards one crore so that it encourages the real estate developers to build these homes for the common man, for the salaried man who's working in these metros." Currently, the threshold stands at Rs 45 lakhs, a figure Tata believes should be raised to Rs 75 lakhs for non-metros and up to Rs 1 crore for major metropolitan hubs.

Addressing the long-term vision for urban migration, Tata noted that with nearly 40 per cent of India's population expected to reside in urban areas by 2030, the government's focus on infrastructure and the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) 2.0 is timely. He pointed out that inflation is becoming more range-bound and that the rationalisation of GST on construction materials has sent a positive signal to the industry.

To further bridge the supply-demand gap, he proposed a collaborative model between the state and private sectors, suggesting that "public-private partnerships, especially where public sector institutions have land and private developers could come in and develop these affordable homes," would create a "win-win-win" scenario for the government, developers, and the "aam aadmi".

To directly assist the salaried class and first-time buyers, Tata outlined specific recommendations for the Union Budget. A primary request is the upward revision of the interest deduction limit on home loans under the Income Tax Act. He suggested that the current Rs 2 lakh cap be increased to Rs 5 lakhs, noting that "it will save the mid-income salaried earners anywhere between four to eight thousand rupees on his monthly saving, which is a big thing for these salaried folks." Such a move would significantly ease the financial burden on families looking to secure their own shelter while simultaneously stimulating demand in the housing sector.

Beyond tax concessions, the Godrej Housing Finance chief advocated for innovative financial solutions to help those struggling with the initial costs of homeownership. He highlighted that many first-time buyers, particularly women, find it difficult to cover registration and stamp duty.

Tata urged the central and state governments to work together to fund these initial contributions through long-term, repayable models rather than subsidies. Additionally, he suggested that the government provide developers of budget homes with access to cheaper capital or tax concessions, ensuring that the benefit of lower costs is ultimately passed on to the end consumer, helping every Indian family realise the dream of owning a home.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Rs 1 crore for an "affordable" home? 😳 This shows how broken our real estate market is. The focus should be on building truly affordable homes for 20-30 lakhs in tier-2 cities with good infra, not just redefining luxury as affordable. The salaried class he's talking about still can't afford 1 crore.
A
Aditya G
Increasing the home loan interest deduction limit to Rs 5 lakh is a fantastic idea. With current interest rates, the Rs 2 lakh cap is exhausted very quickly. This would be a direct benefit to the middle class and boost demand. Hope the Finance Minister is listening!
S
Sarah B
As an expat looking to buy in Bangalore, I see both sides. Prices are insane, so the definition is outdated. But simply raising the price bracket won't solve the core issue of supply. The PPP model for land is the key takeaway here. Government land should be used for public good, not just sold to the highest bidder.
N
Nikhil C
Good points on helping with registration and stamp duty for first-time buyers, especially women. That's a huge upfront cost that stops many families. A repayable model is better than a subsidy—promotes responsibility. Hope state governments take note.
K
Kavya N
While I understand the need to reflect market prices, this feels like giving up on actual affordability. We're just moving the goalpost. The energy should be on controlling land prices and speculation. Otherwise, in 5 years, they'll say affordable is 2 crores. The dream is slipping away for my generation. 🏠

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50