Trump Says End of Iran War Will Be "Mutual" Decision With Netanyahu

President Donald Trump stated that the decision to end the ongoing military conflict with Iran would be a "mutual" one made in coordination with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, though he indicated he would retain the ultimate authority. During an interview, Trump justified the war by claiming Iran was on the verge of destroying Israel prior to the intervention. He also waded into Israeli domestic politics, forcefully calling on President Isaac Herzog to grant Netanyahu an immediate pardon for his ongoing corruption trial. The remarks underscore the close coordination between the US and Israel while highlighting Trump's direct involvement in Israel's internal legal matters.

Key Points: Trump on Iran War End: "Mutual" Decision With Netanyahu

  • War end decision is mutual with Israel
  • Trump retains ultimate authority
  • Trump demands pardon for Netanyahu
  • Conflict justified to prevent regional destruction
  • New Iranian leadership's fate uncertain
4 min read

"I'll make a decision at the right time": Trump says end of Iran war will be "mutual" with Netanyahu

President Trump states the decision to end the Iran conflict will be mutual with Israel's PM, while calling for Netanyahu's pardon.

"I think it's mutual, a little bit. We've been talking. I'll make a decision at the right time. - Donald Trump"

Washington, DC, March 9

United States President Donald Trump has stated that the determination regarding the conclusion of the ongoing conflict with Iran will be a "mutual" decision made in coordination with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to a report by The Times of Israel.

During a telephone interview with the Times of Isael, the US President claimed that the Islamic Republic was on the verge of annihilating Israel prior to the current military intervention. He asserted that "Iran was going to destroy Israel and everything else around it. We've worked together. We've destroyed a country that wanted to destroy Israel."

When questioned on whether the authority to halt the campaign rested solely with Washington or if the Israeli leadership held equal weight, Trump suggested a collaborative approach. "I think it's mutual, a little bit. We've been talking. I'll make a decision at the right time, but everything's going to be taken into account," he remarked, indicating he would retain the ultimate prerogative while considering Netanyahu's input.

Addressing the possibility of Israel continuing military operations independently should the US decide to cease its strikes, Trump dismissed the necessity of such a scenario. The Times of Israel reported that the President declined to engage with the theoretical situation, simply stating: "I don't think it's going to be necessary."

While the White House has suggested the conflict may last between four to six weeks, Trump has avoided committing to a rigid schedule. His remarks underline the deep coordination between the two nations following the joint military operation launched on February 28, which resulted in the death of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei.

The interview took place shortly after Tehran announced that Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of the former leader, had been selected as the new supreme authority. According to The Times of Israel, Trump refrained from offering a detailed commentary on the appointment, declaring only: "We'll see what happens."

This diplomatic stance follows earlier warnings from the US President to ABC News, where he suggested the new Iranian leadership would not "last long" without White House approval. Beyond the battlefield, Trump also waded into Israeli domestic politics, renewing his calls for a legal reprieve for Netanyahu.

The US President criticised Israeli President Isaac Herzog for failing to grant a pardon to Netanyahu, who is currently on trial for bribery, fraud, and breach of trust. "Bibi Netanyahu should be given that pardon immediately. I think [Herzog is] doing a terrible thing by not giving it. We want Bibi to be focused on the war, not on a ridiculous pardon," Trump told The Times of Israel.

In response to these comments, Herzog's office maintained that Israel "is a sovereign state governed by the rule of law," noting that the pardon request is being processed through the Justice Ministry. Despite past friction between the two leaders, Trump praised his current partnership with Netanyahu, stating, "We've done a great job together, like what we've done with Iran."

Reinforcing his justification for the eight-day-old war, Trump claimed the intervention prevented a regional catastrophe. The Times of Israel quoted him saying, "Iran was going to destroy Israel and everything else around it, and now look what we have, we have them being destroyed."

The President further credited his and Netanyahu's leadership for Israel's continued survival, adding that "[if] Bibi wasn't around, Israel would not exist today." He also suggested that the weakening of Tehran would have a ripple effect on regional proxies like Hamas, potentially leading to their disarmament.

"Many people will disarm because of [the war against Iran]," Trump predicted, noting that "Iran is in a position that it's never known before, and it's only going to get worse for them." He reiterated his demand for Herzog to "tell this president to give him the pardon right now."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The instability in the Middle East affects global oil prices and our economy here. I hope this "mutual decision" leads to peace soon. A prolonged war is in no one's interest, especially for developing nations like India who rely on stable energy markets. 🙏
R
Rohit P
Trump saying "if Bibi wasn't around, Israel would not exist today" is such an exaggeration! It diminishes the resilience of the Israeli people. World leaders should be careful with their words. This kind of rhetoric only fuels more tension.
S
Sarah B
From an Indian perspective, we've always advocated for diplomatic solutions. The comment about Hamas disarming seems like wishful thinking. Regional conflicts have deep roots; they aren't solved simply by weakening one state. Hope cooler heads prevail.
V
Vikram M
The timing is suspicious. Just as Iran appoints a new leader, these statements come out. It feels less about security and more about influencing the new regime. India has good relations with many in the region; we must tread carefully and call for dialogue.
K
Karthik V
As an Indian, my primary concern is for the large Indian diaspora in the Gulf region. Their safety is paramount. Leaders making claims about "destroying" a country should remember the human cost—ordinary people suffer the most. #Peace

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50