Iran Accuses US of Hypocritical Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Violations

Iran's UN mission has sharply criticized the United States for "hypocritical behaviour" and non-compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran defended its uranium enrichment activities as lawful under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision. Tehran submitted a new proposal through Pakistan aimed at advancing negotiations to end the West Asia conflict with the US. US President Donald Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the Iranian proposal and justified military action against Iran's nuclear programme.

Key Points: Iran Slams US Hypocrisy on Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

  • Iran accuses US of hypocrisy on NPT obligations
  • Iran defends uranium enrichment under IAEA supervision
  • Iran submits new proposal via Pakistan amid West Asia conflict
  • US President Trump expresses dissatisfaction with Iran's proposal
3 min read

"Hypocritical behaviour": Iran says US not complying with nuclear non-proliferation treaty

Iran's UN mission accuses US of non-compliance with Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, defends uranium enrichment, and submits new proposal via Pakistan amid ongoing West Asia conflict.

"Extremely Shameful! For 56 years, the US...has been in clear non-compliance with its nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament obligations under Articles I and VI of the NPT. - Iran's UN mission"

New York, May 3

Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York on Saturday sharply criticised the United States over nuclear weapons policy, accusing Washington of "hypocritical behaviour" and "non-compliance" of its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

In a post on X, the Iranian mission said, "Extremely Shameful! For 56 years, the US--possessor of thousands of nuclear warheads and the No. 1 proliferator of such weapons--has been in clear non-compliance with its nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament obligations under Articles I and VI of the NPT."

The mission added, "The US should not be given any cover for its outrageous and hypocritical behaviour."

Iran also defended its uranium enrichment activities, arguing that they were lawful under international oversight mechanisms.

"Legally, there is no restriction on the level of uranium enrichment, so long as it is conducted under the IAEA's supervision, as was the case with Iran," the mission said in the X post.

Under the NPT, non-nuclear-weapon States parties have committed themselves not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices while nuclear-weapon States parties have committed not to in any way assist, encourage or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State party to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.

Nuclear-weapon States parties under the Treaty are defined as those that manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device before 1 January 1967. There are five nuclear-weapon States parties to the Treaty.

Meanwhile, Iran submitted its latest proposal aimed at advancing negotiations to end the ongoing West Asia conflict with the US, in response to recent amendments introduced by Washington to a draft plan aimed at ending the conflict.

According to Axios, citing sources familiar with the matter, the latest proposal submitted by Iran through Pakistan, which is acting as a mediator in the talks, comes after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff sent a list of amendments on Monday, focusing on reintroducing the nuclear issue into the draft framework.

According to Iranian state media, IRNA, Tehran submitted its latest proposal aimed at advancing negotiations to end the ongoing West Asia conflict with the US.

Tehran handed over the text of its new proposal to Pakistan on Thursday evening, though details of Tehran's counter-terms have not been fully disclosed.

Axios, citing the source, further reported that one of the proposed US amendments calls for Iran to commit that it will not transfer any enriched uranium from its bombed nuclear facilities or restart any nuclear-related activities at those sites while negotiations are ongoing.

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump on Friday expressed dissatisfaction with Iran's latest proposal aimed at ending the ongoing conflict, while also casting doubt on whether a final agreement can be reached.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, "They want to make a deal, but I'm not satisfied with it, so we'll see what happens."

US President Donald Trump also justified the military action taken against Iran's nuclear programme. He said it was necessary to save the Gulf region, including Israel, from the threat posed if Tehran had been successful in having a nuclear weapon.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
I think it's convenient for Iran to hide behind the NPT when everyone knows they've had past violations. Both sides are playing politics. The US has obligations, yes, but Iran's enrichment levels are concerning. This is a dangerous game in an already volatile region. 😐
K
Kavya N
It's rich coming from the US - the country that dropped atomic bombs on civilians and uses nuclear threats freely. India has always been responsible with our nuclear programme, but we also understand why nations want security through these weapons. The NPT is flawed when it gives privileges to a few countries while lecturing others. We need a more just global order. 🙏
J
James A
Honestly, I've seen this play out before. Iran uses the 'hypocrisy' argument to deflect from their own non-compliance. The IAEA has reported unresolved issues in the past. But the US strikes on Iran's facilities? That's straight-up military aggression under the pretext of security. Both sides need to stop playing games and come to an agreement that ensures regional stability. India must stay out of this quagmire.
R
Rohit P
Washington has zero moral authority on nuclear issues. They sell weapons to everyone, bomb countries, and then preach about non-proliferation. Iran is not innocent - their enrichment is concerning - but the US is the bigger problem here. India should use its good relations with both to push for peace, not for one side or the other. ✌️
M
Michael C
Tragic that we're still arguing about nuclear weapons in 2025. The NPT was supposed to lead to disarmament, not just freeze the status quo

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50