NewKerala.com

HP Assembly Panel Disposes 7 Petitions, 12 Deferred for Next Review

The Petition Committee of the Himachal Pradesh Vidhan Sabha disposed of seven petitions and deferred twelve others during its recent meeting. The committee, chaired by Speaker Kuldeep Singh Pathania, heard oral evidence from department officials, including the Chief Secretary. Petitions spanned multiple departments, with most concerning Revenue and Forest matters. The committee aims to provide citizens with a free and speedy mechanism for redressal against departmental injustice.

Key Points: HP Petition Committee Disposes 7 Cases, Defers 12

  • 7 petitions disposed of
  • 12 petitions deferred
  • 97 total petitions received
  • Oral evidence recorded from officials
  • Focus on Revenue, Forest, and Home Departments
2 min read

HP assembly petition committee disposes of 7 petitions, 12 deferred till next meeting

Himachal Pradesh Vidhan Sabha's Petition Committee disposes of 7 petitions, defers 12. Committee Chairman Kuldeep Singh Pathania details progress on public grievances.

"The objective of the Committee is to provide quick and effective justice to the common people. - Kuldeep Singh Pathania"

Shimla, February 9

The Petition Committee of the Himachal Pradesh Vidhan Sabha on Monday disposed of seven petitions out of the 19 placed before it, while the remaining cases were deferred for further consideration.

According to a press release issued by the HP Vidhan Sabha Secretariat, the meeting was chaired by the Speaker of the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly and Chairman of the Committee, Kuldeep Singh Pathania. Committee members Neeraj Nair, Kamlesh Thakur and Anuradha Rana attended, along with Vidhan Sabha Secretary Yashpal Sharma.

As per the release, Pathania said that 11 petitions related to the Revenue Department, four to the Forest Department and one to the Home Department were taken up during the meeting. Oral evidence was recorded from officials of the relevant departments and from Chief Secretary KK Pant.

Five of the 11 Revenue Department petitions were disposed of during the meeting, while the remaining were deferred with directions to the departments to take appropriate and expeditious action. Two out of four petitions related to the Forest Department were also disposed of, with Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Sanjay Sood appearing before the Committee to give oral evidence.

The lone petition pertaining to the Home Department was deferred as the matter is currently sub judice before the Himachal Pradesh High Court.

The Committee also considered three petitions related to the Health Department and heard oral evidence from the Health Secretary. One petition was deferred for further consideration, while the remaining two were postponed to the next meeting without hearing.

Pathania said the Committee has received 97 petitions to date, of which 46 have now been disposed of. He added that two petitions were returned for lack of evidence, while in four cases, departmental heads have assured appropriate action.

Reiterating the purpose of the Committee, the Speaker said that citizens facing injustice or unnecessary harassment by departments can approach the Petition Committee for speedy and free redress. "The objective of the Committee is to provide quick and effective justice to the common people," he said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
This is a positive step for governance. Having a direct channel for citizens to get their grievances heard by a committee chaired by the Speaker is important. Hope the departments follow through on the directions given. 👍
S
Suresh O
Revenue and Forest departments seem to have the most petitions. Not surprising, given land and forest rights are such sensitive issues in Himachal. Glad the Principal Chief Conservator appeared personally.
A
Anjali F
"Speedy and free redress" – these are the key words. If this committee truly delivers on that promise without the usual bureaucratic delays, it can be a model for other states. The proof will be in the follow-up action.
D
David E
Interesting process. Recording oral evidence from officials like the Chief Secretary adds weight to the proceedings. Deferring the sub judice matter was the correct, lawful thing to do.
K
Kavya N
As someone from Himachal, I appreciate this transparency. Often we feel government committees meet and nothing happens. Publishing which petitions are disposed and which are deferred at least shows some accountability. Hope it helps the common person.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50