RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat: Hindu Identity, Not Caste, Decides Top Post

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat has asserted that caste is not a factor in selecting the organisation's Sarsanghchalak, stating that being a Hindu is the sole qualification. His remarks address allegations from the Congress-led INDIA bloc that the RSS reserves its top post for Brahmins. Bhagwat explained the organisation's historical composition and stressed that its expansion and leadership selection are based on geography and capability, not caste identity. He concluded that being from any particular caste is neither a qualification nor a disqualification for the role.

Key Points: RSS Chief: Hindu Identity, Not Caste, Determines Leadership

  • RSS rejects caste-based leadership claims
  • Bhagwat clarifies only Hindu identity matters
  • Response to Congress-led INDIA bloc allegations
  • Leadership based on competence and availability
  • Growth is geographical, not caste-based
3 min read

Hindu identity, not caste, determines RSS Sarsanghchalak selection, says Mohan Bhagwat

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat clarifies that being a Hindu is the only qualification for the Sarsanghchalak post, rejecting caste-based selection allegations.

Hindu identity, not caste, determines RSS Sarsanghchalak selection, says Mohan Bhagwat
"Only a Hindu will become the Sarsanghchalak. - Mohan Bhagwat"

Mumbai, Feb 8

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday asserted that caste is not a determining factor in the selection of the organisation's Sarsanghchalak, stating that being a Brahmin is not a prerequisite for the position, while emphasising that being a Hindu is the only qualification.

Bhagwat made these remarks while addressing an event titled '100 Year of Sangh Journey - New Horizons' in Mumbai.

His statement comes amid allegations from the Congress-led INDIA bloc, which has accused the RSS of allowing only Brahmins to hold the top leadership position and raised questions about caste representation within the organisation.

Responding to such claims, Bhagwat rejected the allegations and clarified the organisation's position regarding leadership selection, stating, "Who will become the Sarsanghchalak of the organisation? So, no Brahmin can become the Sarsanghchalak of the organisation. No Kshatriya, Vaishya, or Shudra can become the Sarsanghchalak. Only a Hindu will become the Sarsanghchalak. The head of the organisation can be appointed to that post, and if there's something else, he can be appointed to that too."

Explaining the organisational structure and functioning of the RSS, Bhagwat said the Sangh does not appoint its workers or leaders based on caste identity or proportional representation.

"Our workers are not appointed based on this (the caste system). Because we don't have such a proportional system. Whoever works will be the one. Initially, the Sangh was small. The work of the Sangh started in a single locality. It was a Brahmin locality. So, initially, all the office-bearers of the Sangh, from top to bottom, were Brahmins. Then people said that this is a Sangh of these people," he said.

Bhagwat further elaborated that the organisation's growth has been guided by geographical expansion rather than caste considerations. He said the nature of expansion has gradually diversified the Sangh's composition over time.

"We don't expand based on caste; we expand geographically. We have our own people, but the work of the Sangh has expanded. We don't expand based on caste but geographically. So, this is a natural thing that happens in the Sangh. Therefore, I cannot answer whether there will be an SC/ST tomorrow or not, because the person who has to do it will think about it," he said.

Highlighting the criteria for leadership, Bhagwat stressed that competence and availability play a crucial role in selecting individuals for key organisational roles.

He said that the decision is based on who is best suited and able to shoulder responsibilities at a given time.

"One should be the best and also available. I am the Sarsanghchalak. There are other better people, but they are not available. The one who could be made available was the only one. That's why I was made the Sarsanghchalak. So, therefore, being an SC/ST is not a disqualification. Being a Brahmin is not a qualification," he added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While the intent is good, the reality on the ground feels different. If it's truly about competence and availability, why has the top post historically been held by people from a similar background? Actions speak louder than words.
R
Rohit P
Finally someone said it! We are Hindus first. This constant division by caste is what holds us back as a society. The Sangh's focus should be on national character and service, not on ticking boxes for representation.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, the explanation about geographical expansion making the initial leadership Brahmin is logical. But for an organization that wants to represent all Hindus, a more proactive approach to diversity at the top would build greater trust.
V
Vikram M
The point about availability is key. Leading the RSS is a full-time, lifelong commitment of service (pracharak). It's not a political post you campaign for. The right person at the right time is chosen, regardless of jaati.
K
Kavya N
It's a good clarification, but the perception remains. Maybe the Sangh can showcase more diverse faces in its second-rung leadership publicly? That would naturally lead to a more diverse pool for the top post in the future. 🤔

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50