Himachal Faces 15% Fiscal Gap After Key Central Grant Withdrawal

Himachal Pradesh is facing a severe fiscal gap of nearly 15% following the withdrawal of the crucial Revenue Deficit Grant. State advisor Naresh Chauhan warns this could lead to a loss of nearly Rs 10,000 crore annually, totaling Rs 50,000 crore over five years. Chief Minister Sukhvinder Sukhu has held discussions with the Union Finance Minister to present the state's case based on constitutional provisions. The state government stresses that bridging this gap with internal resources is unfeasible and appeals for unity beyond partisan politics.

Key Points: Himachal's 15% Fiscal Gap After Grant Withdrawal

  • 15% fiscal gap after grant withdrawal
  • Potential Rs 50,000 crore loss over 5 years
  • Chief Minister has engaged Union Finance Minister
  • Issue framed as state's rights, not politics
  • Opposition urged to unite on the matter
2 min read

Himachal 'confronting' fiscal gap of 15 pc after withdrawal of Revenue Deficit Grant ​

Himachal Pradesh confronts a 15% budget shortfall after losing the Revenue Deficit Grant, risking Rs 50,000 crore over five years.

"It would be practically unfeasible for the state to bridge a 15 per cent budgetary shortfall solely through its internal resources. - Naresh Chauhan"

Shimla, March 3

Himachal Pradesh is confronting a fiscal gap of nearly 15 per cent following the withdrawal of the Revenue Deficit Grant, said Naresh Chauhan, Principal Media Advisor to the Chief Minister, on Tuesday. ​

He said the RDG withdrawal directly affected approximately every section of the state, having a population of around 7.5 million". He said that, for a small and predominantly hilly state like Himachal Pradesh, such financial assistance has been indispensable for sustaining developmental initiatives and public welfare programmes.​

He clarified that Article 275 (1) of the Constitution provides for financial assistance to special category states to enable them to attain self-reliance and fiscal stability. ​

Referring to the recommendations of the 16th Finance Commission, Chauhan said the omission of this crucial provision could result in an annual loss of nearly Rs 10,000 crore to the state, amounting to approximately Rs 50,000 crore over five years. ​

He underlined that it would be practically unfeasible for the state to bridge a 15 per cent budgetary shortfall solely through its internal resources. Stressing that the matter transcends political considerations, he described it as an issue concerning the state's legitimate rights and long-term future. ​

He said Chief Minister Sukhvinder Sukhu has held detailed discussions with the Union Finance Minister, presenting comprehensive facts, constitutional provisions, and reasoned arguments to safeguard the state's interests. ​

Chauhan appealed to the Opposition parties to rise above partisan politics and unite in the larger interest of Himachal Pradesh. ​

On the protest during the AI Summit, Chauhan said the youth were not opposing the summit per se; rather, they were expressing apprehensions about the potential implications of the proposed US-India trade agreement, particularly for the agriculture and horticulture sectors. ​

He said peaceful protest was a fundamental democratic right and should neither be branded as anti-national nor construed as detrimental to the state's image. ​

Commenting on the action undertaken by the Delhi Police in Himachal Pradesh, Chauhan said conducting operations without a warrant and without prior intimation to the local police authorities was inconsistent with established protocol. ​

On the forthcoming Rajya Sabha elections, Chauhan stated that the numerical strength in the state Assembly favoured the Congress, and that the party's candidate would be decided by the party's High Command. ​

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I understand the state's concern, there has to be a path to fiscal self-reliance. Grants can't be perpetual. What is the state government's concrete plan to boost its own revenue? Tourism and hydropower are huge potentials there. 🤔
P
Priya S
Rs 50,000 crore over five years! That's an eye-watering amount for a state with 75 lakh people. This will directly hit public welfare schemes. Hope the CM's talks with the FM yield a solution. Jai Himachal! 🙏
R
Rohit P
Good that the advisor is asking opposition to unite. These are matters of state interest, not party politics. Delhi Police acting without informing local police is also not done at all. Sets a wrong precedent.
V
Vikram M
The youth protesting about trade agreements affecting apple farmers etc. is a valid concern. Peaceful protest is our right. Calling it anti-national is just to shut down debate. Focus should be on the fiscal crisis first.
N
Nikhil C
Article 275(1) is there for a reason. If the 16th Finance Commission omits it, it goes against the constitutional spirit for special category states. This needs a legal and constitutional debate, not just political one.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50