Himachal HC Orders Panchayat, ULB Polls by April 30, Rejects Govt's Delay Plea

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has directed the state government to hold elections for Panchayati Raj Institutions and Urban Local Bodies by April 30, rejecting its plea for a six-month postponement. The government had sought more time citing extensive damage from recent monsoon calamities, with losses exceeding Rs 10,000 crore, which it argued hampered administrative capacity. The court ordered all preparatory formalities to be finalized by February 28, while considering logistical issues like school exams in March. The opposition had accused the ruling government of delaying polls due to fear of electoral defeat.

Key Points: Himachal HC Directs Panchayat, ULB Elections by April 30

  • Court rejects plea for 6-month poll delay
  • Orders elections by April 30
  • Govt cited Rs 10,000 crore monsoon damage
  • Opposition accused govt of fearing defeat
3 min read

HC nixes Himachal govt's plea for more time; directs it to hold panchayat, ULB polls by April 30

Himachal Pradesh High Court rejects state's plea to delay local body polls, orders elections by April 30 despite govt citing monsoon disaster damage.

"extensive damage to private and public property - Himachal Government"

Shimla, Jan 9

In a setback to the Himachal government, the High Court on Friday rejected its plea for more time due to the ongoing rebuilding work after recent natural calamities, and directed it to conduct elections for Panchayati Raj Institutions and Urban Local Bodies by April 30.

Disposing a petition that challenged the government's decision to postpone the polls for six months, a Division Bench of Justices Vivek Thakur and Romesh Verma asked the State Election Commission and the government to finalise all preparatory formalities relating to the polls by February 28.

However, the government had argued that "extensive damage to private and public property" during the recent monsoon, which saw losses exceeding Rs 10,000 crore in the state, rendered the administrative machinery unable to hold polls.

In October, the government had directed the State Election Commission to stall the process "until things improve on the ground", citing blocked rural roads and logistical hurdles.

During hearings, the Bench noted logistic hassles owing to school Board examinations in March and the National Census in May.

The Bench issued the directive while disposing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Mandeep Chandel challenging the proposed postponement of the elections.

The state government, citing extensive damage caused by recent natural calamities and the invocation of the Disaster Management Act, had urged the court to defer the elections.

It stated that holding elections in the present scenario would be unfeasible and requested a six-month extension. However, the court did not accept the government's justification.

Advocate Nand Lal, appearing for the petitioner, informed the court that conducting elections during the school examination period would be impractical due to the use of school buildings as polling stations.

The court considered this while determining the extended deadline. The five-year term of the existing PRIs will end on January 31 and the tenure of 50 ULBs concludes earlier on January 18.

Earlier, Chief Minister Sukhwinder Sukhu had clarified that panchayat elections were not cancelled but postponed. He had said the government will hold them after addressing the disaster, as relief and rescue operations are being hampered by election activities.

"This time there has been more devastation than in 2023. We have not yet succeeded in connecting the roads of the panchayats. Their restoration work is ongoing. His first duty is to resettle the affected families. Providing relief funds to those whose homes were destroyed, livestock and land swept away, is a priority," an official statement quoting the Chief Minister had said.

However, Leader of Opposition Jairam Thakur had accused the government of running away from elections due to fear of defeat.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
I have family in Himachal. The devastation is real and heartbreaking. While elections are important, how can officials focus on poll duty when families are still homeless? The court could have shown a little more empathy. Relief work should be the top priority right now.
J
James A
Interesting to see the judiciary stepping in to enforce democratic timelines. The government's argument about logistical hurdles due to exams and census seems valid, but the court has balanced that by giving a firm deadline. April 30 seems like a reasonable compromise.
V
Vikram M
The opposition leader's comment hits the nail on the head. After a poor performance in the Lok Sabha polls, the state government is clearly scared of facing the people. Using natural calamities as an excuse is a low blow. Shameful politics. 🙄
S
Sneha F
Good judgment! Local governance cannot have a vacuum. The new panchayats and ULBs are crucial for sanctioning rebuilding funds and overseeing rehabilitation. The affected people need their local representatives more than ever. The court has thought about ground reality.
A
Aman W
Respectfully, I think the HC has overlooked genuine administrative constraints. Conducting free and fair elections requires manpower and infrastructure, which is currently deployed for disaster management. A 3-4 month extension would not have hurt democracy but ensured better polls.
K
K

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50