India's Trade Needs Tariff Overhaul, Customs Reform: GTRI Report

A new report by the Global Trade Research Initiative calls for a comprehensive overhaul of India's import tariff structure and customs administration to reduce trade costs and boost competitiveness. It argues that the current complex system, with its skewed revenue generation and many overlapping notifications, imposes high administrative burdens. The think-tank recommends zero duty on most raw materials, a low standard duty on finished goods, and eliminating inverted duty structures that harm domestic manufacturing. The reforms aim to align customs with India's broader manufacturing and supply-chain ambitions, especially as Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has signaled an openness to procedural changes.

Key Points: GTRI Calls for Tariff, Customs Reform to Boost India's Trade

  • Rationalize complex import tariff structure
  • Modernize labyrinthine customs procedures
  • Eliminate inverted duty structures hurting manufacturing
  • Adopt low, standard duty on finished goods
3 min read

GTRI calls for overhaul of tariff structure, customs to boost India's trade

GTRI report urges overhaul of India's import tariffs & customs to cut trade costs, boost manufacturing competitiveness, and revive export growth.

"transform customs from a control-oriented system into... a growth-enabling institution - GTRI Report"

New Delhi, January 17

India needs a sweeping overhaul of its import tariff structure and customs administration to cut trade costs, strengthen manufacturing competitiveness and revive export growth, suggests trade-focused think-tank Global Trade Research Initiative.

The report, titled ;A Blueprint for Modernizing India's Import Tariffs and Customs Regime', outlined the need for reforms, spanning tariff policy, customs procedures, export incentives and manpower deployment.

Taken together, the measures would transform customs from a control-oriented system into what the authors described as a growth-enabling institution aligned with India's broader manufacturing and supply-chain ambitions.

The study comes as India's merchandise trade crosses USD 1.16 trillion and nearly 29 per cent of gross domestic product flows through customs clearances.

In that context, even modest inefficiencies now impose economy-wide costs, raising input prices, delaying shipments and weakening export competitiveness at a time when global companies are reassessing sourcing locations amid geopolitical fragmentation.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman's commitment in December to overhaul customs procedures has created a rare policy opening, the GTRI report said, but warned that piecemeal changes will not be enough.

At the core of the recommendations is a call to rationalise India's import tariffs, which the report argued have lost relevance as a revenue instrument while continuing to distort production decisions.

Customs duties now account for just 6 per cent of gross tax revenue and average only 3.9 per cent of the value of imports, according to GTRI.

The distribution of tariff revenue is highly skewed, it argued. Nearly 90 per cent of import value is concentrated in fewer than 10 per cent of tariff lines, while the bottom 60 per cent of tariff lines generate under 3 per cent of customs revenue.

Maintaining a complex tariff schedule for such limited fiscal return imposes high administrative and compliance costs, the GTRI report argued.

GTRI recommended imposing zero duty on most industrial raw materials and key intermediates, while adopting a low, standard duty (around 5 per cent), on finished industrial goods over the next three years. It also called for eliminating inverted duty structures, where inputs are taxed more heavily than finished products, quietly eroding domestic manufacturing competitiveness.

Extreme tariffs, such as the 150 per cent duty on alcohol, should be rationalised, the report added, arguing that such rates encourage evasion while delivering negligible fiscal gain.

Equally important, tariff reform should be based on total import duty, not just headline basic customs duty, it suggested. Importers face a cumulative burden of cesses, surcharges and trade remedies, making the effective tariff far more complex than official rate schedules suggest.

Beyond tariffs, the report takes aim at what it describes as a labyrinthine system of customs notifications, many of which amend decades-old rules and are not self-contained. Traders must navigate hundreds of overlapping notifications to determine applicable duties, often without clear HS-code references.

GTRI urged the government to issue self-contained notifications that clearly state their full impact, and to publish all applicable import duties in a single, unified online schedule.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is crucial for 'Make in India' to succeed. How can we compete with Vietnam or Bangladesh if our own manufacturers pay more for inputs than for finished goods? The inverted duty structure has been a silent killer for years. Rationalising tariffs on raw materials is the first logical step.
R
Rohit P
While the intent is good, I'm skeptical. Every committee recommends simplification, but the ground reality at ports doesn't change. The "labyrinthine" system benefits too many people in the chain. Reform needs to be ruthless and top-down, not just another report. 🤞
S
Sarah B
As someone who works in international trade logistics, the point about hundreds of overlapping notifications is 100% accurate. Clients are often confused about the final payable duty. A unified, transparent digital system is not a luxury, it's a necessity for a $1.16 trillion trade economy.
K
Karthik V
The statistic says it all - 90% of import value in less than 10% of tariff lines. Why are we maintaining such a complex web for so little revenue? It only breeds corruption and inefficiency. Simplify, digitise, and focus on facilitating trade, not controlling it. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
M
Meera T
I appreciate GTRI's detailed work. However, we must be careful. Zero duty on raw materials is good, but a blanket low duty on finished goods could hurt some of our emerging sectors if done too quickly. Strategic protection for certain industries is still needed. The overhaul should be phased and smart.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50