Trump Hails "Great News" as Judge Allows White House Ballroom Project

A federal judge has declined to halt the construction of a new White House ballroom, a decision hailed by President Donald Trump as "great news for America." Preservation groups had filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the project until compliance with federal review processes. Trump asserts the project is entirely funded by private donors and is ahead of schedule and under budget. If completed by 2028, the ballroom would be the most significant physical change to the White House during Trump's tenure.

Key Points: Judge Allows Trump's White House Ballroom Project to Proceed

  • Judge refuses to block ballroom construction
  • Project funded by private donors, not taxpayers
  • Preservation groups' lawsuit dismissed
  • Ballroom to host state events, completed by 2028
  • Cost estimate has risen to $300 million
2 min read

"Great news for America": Trump after Judge declines to halt White House Ballroom project

A federal judge declined to halt the White House ballroom construction, a project President Trump says is privately funded and "great news for America."

"Great news for America, and our wonderful White House! - Donald Trump"

Washington DC, February 27

US President Donald Trump on Thursday hailed a federal judge's decision allowing the White House ballroom project to proceed, calling it "great news for America".

He also asserted that the construction is being funded entirely by private donors, not taxpayer money.

A federal judge on Thursday refused to block President Trump's White House ballroom construction project after preservation groups filed a lawsuit seeking to stop it, as reported by The Hill.

The preservation groups asked the court to pause construction of the new ballroom until the White House complies with federal requirements, including securing congressional approval, completing independent reviews, and allowing for a public comment process.

Sharing the development on Truth Social, the US President wrote, "Great news for America, and our wonderful White House! The Judge on the case of what will be the most beautiful Ballroom anywhere in the World, has just thrown out, and completely erased, the effort to stop its construction. As everyone knows, not one dollar of Taxpayer money is being spent, but rather, all money necessary to build this magnificent building is being put up by Patriot Donors and Contributors."

"The Ballroom construction, which is anticipated to also handle future Inaugurations and large State Visits, is ahead of schedule, and under budget. It will stand long into the future as a symbol to the Greatness of America!" the post read.

Trump's decision in October to tear down the East Wing paved the way for construction of a new 90,000-square-foot ballroom designed to host state dinners, galas and other major events. The project is expected to be completed by 2028, as reported by The Hill.

The estimated cost has risen from USD 200 million to USD 300 million, with the administration claiming that private donors are funding the project, as reported by Al Jazeera.

If completed, the ballroom would represent the most significant physical change to the White House during Trump's tenure.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the parallels. We have heritage conservation debates in India too, like over Central Vista. The judge's decision highlights the balance between development and preservation. The "private donor" model is intriguing, but who are these donors? That's the real question.
A
Arjun K
"Ahead of schedule and under budget" – if only our government projects in India could say the same! 😅 Jokes aside, a new ballroom is fine, but calling it "great news for America" feels a bit much. What about news on healthcare or jobs? Priorities seem off.
P
Priyanka N
As an architect, I'm curious about the design! 90,000 sq ft is massive. It will be a symbol, alright. But I hope they preserved the historical essence. In India, we struggle with modern additions to heritage sites. The public comment process they skipped is crucial for such things.
V
Vikram M
Private funding for a government building? Sounds like a way to bypass accountability. In our country, we'd have a huge debate about "crony capitalism". The judge should have at least ensured all reviews were complete. This sets a worrying precedent.
M
Michael C
Reading this from Delhi. It's their internal matter, but the optics are fascinating. A leader personally celebrating a court win for a construction project. The branding of donors as "Patriots" is a powerful political tool. We see similar narratives here sometimes.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50