Tue, 28 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 28, 2026 · 14:25
India News Updated Jul 28, 2026

Govt Willing to Extend Anti-Paper Leak Bill Debate to 10 Hours in Lok Sabha

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju announced the government's willingness to extend the debate on the anti-paper leak Bill to 10 hours in the Lok Sabha. Opposition MP K.C. Venugopal objected to the absence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah during the discussion. The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, proposes stringent penalties including up to 10 years imprisonment and Rs 10 crore fine. The bill also mandates fast-track courts to deliver verdicts within three months for examination-related offences.

Govt willing to stretch anti-paper leak Bill debate to 10 hours in LS, says Kiren Rijiju

New Delhi, July 28

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Tuesday said that the government is willing to extend the time of the anti-paper leak debate in the Lok Sabha to up to 10 hours as the House resumed at 2 p.m.

As the proceedings commenced to discuss the exam Bill, Congress MP K.C. Venugopal objected to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah not being present in the House during the discussion on "a very important" Bill. The Opposition also demanded an extension in the discussion time.

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju clarified that the government has no objection to extending the duration of the debate up to 10 hours.

"All political parties had first agreed to six hours of discussion on the anti-paper leak Bill, then it was increased to eight hours. Now, if the Opposition wants more time, we are willing to take it up for 10 hours," Rijiju said.

The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, was introduced in the Lok Sabha by the Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh on Monday.

This Bill seeks to amend the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024.

The proposed amendment aims to enhance transparency and integrity in the examination system through stricter legal provisions while ensuring that the future of students remains fully protected. Among the key features are stringent penalties, including imprisonment of up to 10 years, a fine of up to Rs 10 crore, confiscation of assets of those found guilty, and the establishment of a mechanism to ensure verdicts are delivered within three months.

The move follows the Union Cabinet's approval of the bill and related provisions, designed to establish fast-track courts and provide harsher punishment in cases involving paper leaks and examination fraud.

The initiative comes shortly after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that a comprehensive Bill containing provisions for strong action against paper leaks would be introduced in Parliament.

As per the proposal, the fast-track courts will be mandated to complete trials and deliver judgments within three months, ensuring swift justice in examination-related offences.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Kavya N

I appreciate the government's willingness to extend debate time, but where were the PM and HM when the Bill was being introduced? Opposition has a point—such a crucial Bill needs top leaders present. Also, Rs 10 crore fine is steep, but will it actually deter the mafia? 🤔

Arun Y

Good move, but I'm skeptical. We've seen so many committees and Bills before—NEET, UGC NET, CUET—all had leaks. Fast-track courts within 3 months sound great on paper (pun intended!), but our judiciary is already overloaded. Need proper implementation, not just headlines.

Sarah B

As someone who studied in India before moving abroad, this is long overdue. The exam system here is incredibly competitive, and paper leaks only add to the stress. If the Bill can truly protect students' futures and punish the culprits swiftly, it's a win for everyone.

Tanvi S

Seriously, where is the accountability for the officials who leak papers? 10 years jail is harsh but what about the masterminds behind the rackets? Also, I hope the Bill doesn't lead to harassment of honest students during investigations. Balance is key. 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked