Government may give fresh push to delimitation bill in monsoon session
New Delhi, July 17
There is an effort by the government to reach a consensus with different political parties for a fresh push to the delimitation bill linked to women's reservation in the monsoon session of Parliament, sources said on Friday, noting that attempts are being made to remove apprehensions with assurance of a uniform 50% increase in Lok Sabha seats in states.
Sources said that while the government is close to a two-thirds majority in the Rajya Sabha, it is still seeking more support in the Lok Sabha.
The Delimitation bill linked to women's reservation quota was defeated in the Lok Sabha in the budget session as it did not get requisite support.
The situation has changed with "splits" in the Trinamool Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT). DMK also suffered a defeat in the recent assembly polls and has differences with Congress.
The Congress, however, has said that the government does not have the numbers to push the constitution amendment bills and that the opposition parties are united.
Party leader Jairam Ramesh said that while splits in TMC and Shiv Sena (UBT) are setbacks for the opposition, the government is still far from the numbers for constitution amendment bills in the Lok Sabha.
In a sudden decision ahead of the monsoon session of Parliament, the Parliamentary panel looking into the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 and two other related bills on Friday decided to have more deliberations and deferred the adoption of the draft report.
Chairperson of the panel Aparajita Sarangi said they have kept the report "pending as of now". The bill seeks to provide a legal framework for the removal of the Chief Minister, Minister or Prime Minister if arrested or detained for 30 days in cases of serious criminal offences.
Opposition parties are strongly opposed to the Constitution Amendment Bill, though members of some parties opposed to the BJP are participating in the deliberations of the panel.
Though adoption of the draft report was on the agenda of the committee, it deferred the decision
."The meeting did not adopt the draft report today. We will have further deliberations. There were five recommendations placed before all of us. But when we started discussing the recommendations, the entire Joint Parliamentary Committee unanimously felt that we needed more deliberations and consultation with more stakeholders," Aparajita Sarangi later told reporters.
"We are keeping it pending as of now. We wrote two letters, to all 27 political parties--one on 13 May 2026 and another on 30 June 2026. Five parties sent their suggestions, but declined to join in. The government wanted to take everyone along. We held discussions with members from other parties, and there was broad agreement that the Bill would have far-reaching implications for the country. Everyone acknowledged that the government's intent was right, but felt the proposal required further discussion and consideration. Discussions with the major opposition parties are also continuing," she added.
The committee examining the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, The Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025 heard the views of Home Ministry officials on Friday."
Consideration and adoption of Draft Report" was on the agenda of the panel.
An Opposition member later said that the decision to defer adoption of the report was taken while the voting was being done on the recommendations.
The monsoon session of Parliament will commence on July 20.
— ANI
Reader Comments
I'm cautiously optimistic about the fresh push. The opposition parties need to stop blocking everything just because it's from the government. Women's reservation is long overdue - we have 50% women in many gram panchayats, why not in Lok Sabha? But I also understand the concerns about delayed implementation and state seat adjustments. Let's see if they can reach a middle ground. 😊
The way the opposition is uniting against this is suspicious. Is it really about women's reservation or just politics? The government should focus on explaining the bill's benefits instead of pushing it through with numbers. Also, that Constitution Amendment Bill about removing arrested CMs/PMs is a separate issue and needs careful scrutiny. Too many things being lumped together in one session. 🤔
As someone from the US following Indian politics, this is fascinating. The 50% uniform increase seems like a creative solution to the complex federal balance issue. I hope the parliamentary committee's extra deliberation leads to a stronger consensus. Women's representation globally is improving, and India can set an example here.
Honestly, I'm tired of these political games. The bill was defeated in budget session, now they're trying again with changed equations after splits in TMC and Shiv Sena? This is pure power politics, not governance. The real issue is that women's reservation needs to be implemented properly with rotation of seats so it doesn't become permanent reservation for select constituencies. Both sides need to be more transparent.
Great to see India's democracy
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.