US Senators Grill Pentagon Nominees on Arctic Threats and Border Security

US senators pressed Pentagon nominees on defending the homeland from Arctic threats to southern border drone incursions. The hearing highlighted Russian and Chinese military activity near Alaska as a core homeland defense issue. Lawmakers also scrutinized the safety of laser counter-drone systems and safeguards against using troops near polling stations. The nominees addressed logistics challenges in the Indo-Pacific and commitments to legal reviews for domestic deployments.

Key Points: Senators Question Pentagon Nominees on Arctic, Border Defense

  • Arctic defense against Russia & China
  • Border drone incursion concerns
  • Legal safeguards for election deployments
  • Sustainment logistics for Indo-Pacific
  • Pentagon-FAA coordination on laser systems
3 min read

From Arctic to border, US senators test Pentagon nominees

Hearing focuses on Russian-Chinese activity near Alaska, counter-drone ops, and election safeguards. Nominees Ditlevson and Birdwell face Senate panel.

"the most dangerous threat environment since World War II - Roger Wicker"

Washington, Feb 28

From Russian and Chinese military activity near Alaska to drone incursions at the US-Mexico border, American senators pressed two Pentagon nominees on how they would defend the homeland while preserving civil liberties during a closely watched confirmation hearing.

The Senate Armed Services Committee examined the nominations of Mark Roosevelt Ditlevson to be Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs, and Brian D. Birdwell to be Assistant Secretary of Defence for Sustainment.

Committee Chairman Roger Wicker said the United States faces "the most dangerous threat environment since World War II" and described a period of "profound strategic uncertainty."

A major theme was the Arctic. Senator Dan Sullivan pointed to recent Russian and Chinese air and naval activity near Alaska, including joint operations, and called it "the definition of homeland defense." He stressed that Alaska is "America's neck of the woods" and a frontline in strategic competition.

Ditlevson agreed that Alaska is "vital to the defense of the other 49 states" and pledged, if confirmed, to work on ensuring Arctic priorities are reflected in implementing guidance and strategy.

The senators focused on counter-drone operations and Pentagon support to immigration enforcement on the southern border.

Ranking Member Jack Reed questioned the deployment of a high-energy laser system to shoot down suspected drones near El Paso, Texas, citing an FAA warning of "a grave risk of fatalities or permanent injuries to civilian aircraft."

Ditlevson said the Department of Defence "always cares about safety" and maintained that under existing law it was required to coordinate with the Federal Aviation Administration, but "does not require approval from the FAA." He described 14 months of "robust communication" with aviation authorities and said the system was "incredibly safe."

Lawmakers also raised concerns about the use of National Guard troops in American cities and hypothetical deployments near polling stations during elections. Ditlevson called such scenarios "speculative" but said any recommendation to the Secretary of Defense would undergo legal review to ensure it was lawful.

Senator Tammy Duckworth cited federal law barring interference by armed forces in elections and warned against using the military to "intimidate" voters. Ditlevson responded that any deployment would be tailored to specific threats and reviewed by legal counsel.

Birdwell's nomination brought attention to logistics and industrial capacity, especially in the Indo-Pacific. He described "contested logistics" as "the center of gravity mission for the department" and stressed the need to sustain forces "as far forward at the point of need as possible."

Senator Mark Kelly argued that strengthening America's commercial shipbuilding sector would also bolster naval power amid China's maritime expansion. Birdwell said he would work to reinforce both the "organic industrial base" and commercial capabilities.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
The part about "contested logistics" in the Indo-Pacific directly concerns India. If the US wants to sustain forces forward to counter China, they need reliable partners. Hope our defense cooperation deepens, but on our own terms. Jai Hind!
R
Rohit P
Using lasers to shoot down drones at the border sounds like a scene from a movie! But the FAA warning is serious. Safety must come first, always. We have enough challenges with drones on our own borders without adding laser hazards to the mix.
S
Sarah B
As someone living in India, I find the US's constant "most dangerous threat" rhetoric a bit over the top. They have oceans on both sides and friendly neighbors. Try having China and Pakistan as neighbors, then talk about threat environment!
V
Vikram M
The focus on commercial shipbuilding is key. China dominates global shipping. If the US wants to counter that in the Indo-Pacific, they should invest in partnerships with Indian shipyards too. Make in India could be part of the solution.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, the article shows the US is still looking at the world through a Cold War lens. Russia-China joint ops near Alaska? The real strategic game is in the Indian Ocean Region, which is our backyard. Hope US strategy accounts for that.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50